Johan Ström wrote:
Hello
A box of mine running RELENG_7_0 and ZFS over a couple of disks (6
disks, 3 mirrors) seems to have gotten stuck. From Ctrl-T:
load: 0.50 cmd: zsh 40188 [zfs:buf_hash_table.ht_locks[i].ht_lock]
0.02u 0.04s 0% 3404k
load: 0.43 cmd: zsh 40188
For your question: just reboot would be fine, you may want to tune your
arc size (to be smaller) and kmem space (to be larger), which would
reduce the chance that this would happen, or eliminate it, depending on
your workload.
This situation is not recoverable and you can trust ZFS that you
Hi,
The following iozone test case on ZFS would reliably trigger panic:
/usr/local/bin/iozone -M -e -+u -T -t 128 -S 4096 -L 64 -R -r 4k -s 30g
-i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -i 8 -+p 70 -C
Unfortunately the kgdb can not reveal useful backtrace. I have tried
KDB_TRACE, but have not yet be able to further
Dan Epure wrote:
Hi,
For the moment this feature is only available in HEAD. I think the limit is
only 512 master/slave pairs.
Should be enough for this year. Is it going to be merged in 6.3 ?
Thanks again.
I don't think so. Currently the FreeBSD pts implementation has some
serious
Chris H. wrote:
Quoting LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
Any advice would be *greatly* appreciated.
Install /usr/ports/misc/zoneinfo or upgrade your system to a recent
release (preferred), e.g. RELENG_6_2 aka FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE.
Re-run tzsetup and choose your time zone
Chris H. wrote:
Any advice would be *greatly* appreciated.
Install /usr/ports/misc/zoneinfo or upgrade your system to a recent
release (preferred), e.g. RELENG_6_2 aka FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE.
Re-run tzsetup and choose your time zone accordingly. You will need to
restart the time-sensitive
Clint Olsen wrote:
I just attempted a source upgrade from 5.5-STABLE to 6.3-PRERELEASE, and it
was a disaster, more than likely because I forgot to do something.
Normally I'm saved by the fact that the operations are not so scary as to
cause problems.
[... restore old kernel worked; new kernel
Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
A couple of days ago I csup'd RELENG_7 and I noticed the GENERIC kernel
was missing the following options...
options KDB
options DDB
options GDB
options INVARIANTS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
options WITNESS
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Hello,
This is just a fresh csup buildworld, buildkernel with GENERIC
Motherboard: Foxconn G33M
ata controllers not found so it runs generic @ udma33 slowest possible
I think the chipset is not yet supported by -HEAD now. Would you please
try the
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Thank you Li,
It works, and thank you for the RELENG_6 patch too.
Thanks. I have just committed the -CURRENT patch against -HEAD and it
should appear in RELENG_7 (7.0-BETA).
Cheers,
--
Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The
Jeff Kramer wrote:
Hey all,
I know that AMD64's the preferred way to run 4 gig systems, but I'm
having a weird situation with 6.2-RELEASE-p8 and 6-STABLE as of last
night. When I compile the PAE kernel, my system performance drops like
a rock. It still boots and everything still runs, but
Carlos Fernando Assis Paniago wrote:
plutao# make
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DIPSEC -DINET6 -DFAST_IPSEC
-Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wno-uninitialized -c
Tom Evans wrote:
Hi stable@, jail@ [jail@ plz cc me as I'm not subscribed]
I'm having some problems setting up some jails for semi-isolated
development (ie, so we can isolate the developers into a jail, give them
all the root access they want, and not worry about them blowing up more
than
I think this is a bug, here is a fix obtained from NetBSD.
The reasoning (from NetBSD's rm.c,v 1.16):
Strip trailing slashes of operands in checkdot().
POSIX.2 requires that if . or .. are specified as the basename
portion of an operand, a diagnostic message be written to standard
error, etc.
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
By the way, an additional confusion is that .. and ../
are handled differently. Specifying .. always leads to
this message:
rm: . and .. may not be removed
and nothing is actually removed. It is
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Hi,
Recently I am considering to move to another MTA. At one time I was
wondering what mail server big ISP are running. I can't decide postfix
or qmail.
Which one is best MTA for me?
We (one of the largest ICP company in China and provides some billions
of free
Jack Vogel wrote:
The next driver I that I release via Intel channels is going to
merge the code for 6 and 7. I was thinking that I could check that
into the tip and it would make the most current version buildable
on either RELEASE, was wondering if that is looked upon favorably
or not? I
Alexey Sopov wrote:
#16 0xc0539c1c in ithread_execute_handlers ()
#17 0xc0539d66 in ithread_loop ()
#18 0xc053878f in fork_exit ()
#19 0xc06ec18c in fork_trampoline ()
XL I think this was a fatal trap 12 and you may want to try if updating to
XL 6.2-STABLE helps. There was some important
Hi, Erik,
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Volker wrote:
[...]
I know there's a release cycle for 7-CURRENT planned next June but
IMHO it can be delayed for some weeks.
What does the core and releng team think? It might do good.
A quick release cycle for a
Hi, Steve,
steve wrote:
[...]
http://atm.tut.fi/list-archive/freebsd-stable/msg19288.html
that I appled to 4.x and it solved the problem.
Now that I have upgraded to 6.2, the problem has
recurred, but the previous patch is no longer valid. Is
there something wrong with the
Ivan Voras wrote:
Chris wrote:
and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers
running FreeBSD have to remain on vulnerable versions of ports as a
result of this?
This looks like another call to have RELENG_x branches on ports, with
which I agree.
Hmm... Branching is
Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
[snip]
Not all people can do deadlock debugging, though. In my case turning on
INVARIANTS and WITNESS leads to unacceptable performance penalty due to
heavily
loaded server. So I can only describe my case, actions and result without
providing any debug information.
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:08:48PM +, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
At work, amoungst my stable of old computers running FreeBSD, I have a
Fujitsu M800 - a 4 Zeon SMP processor with 4 GB of memory. This
Hi, Oleg,
Oleg Derevenetz wrote:
Цитирую LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
I'm not very sure if this is specific to one disk controller. Actually
I got some occasional reports about similar hangs on amd64 6.2-RELEASE
(slightly patched version) that most of processes stuck in the 'ufs'
state
Gustavo Feijó wrote:
Found the problem origin:
Amavis
Apr 10 13:34:02 serv01 amavis[26962]: (26962-01) (!!)TROUBLE in
process_request: Can't create directory
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20070410T133402-26962: Too many links at
/usr/sbin/amavisd line 4215, GEN3 line 2.
Searching for
Hi, Jack,
Jack Vogel wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:14:0: class=0x02 card=0x002e8086 chip=0x100e8086
rev=0x02
hdr=0x00
[...]
The driver in 6.2 RELEASE fixed all known problems with
watchdogs, other than REAL issues with the network/hardware.
Have you tried installing that?
A friend of mine
LI Xin wrote:
Hi, Jack,
Jack Vogel wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:14:0: class=0x02 card=0x002e8086 chip=0x100e8086
rev=0x02
hdr=0x00
[...]
The driver in 6.2 RELEASE fixed all known problems with
watchdogs, other than REAL issues with the network/hardware.
Have you tried installing
Oliver Fromme wrote:
LI Xin wrote:
I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
Yes, that would be very useful. But it should also take
any includes into account.
It was very annoying to discover that INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE
Pete French wrote:
I appear to have a machine which will not run RELENG_6_2, though it runs
the released code quite happily. Is there a CVS tag I can use to revert the
sources back to the way they were on RELEASE? I want to be able to
verify that this is and track down what changed! I don't
Pete French wrote:
I think you will want RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE.
thanks (and to the others who responded)
What happens with RELENG_6_2, IIRC there was only very limited changes
to kernel which should only affect IPv6...
Indeed! Part of the reason I want to do the revert is to make
: LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
I did some work in this area, as several system administrators I've met
also seem to have problem with kernel configuration recovery. In my case
I came
Hi,
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Dimitry Andric wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
What does stuttering mean? Is it similar to sendmail's
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
[...]
Can someone comment on whether I just missed the commit on my last cvsup, or
if
I'm hitting the same problem but in a different way?
I think so. Try patching your system with:
src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9
src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7
src/sys/vm/uma.h,v
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
[...]
Here's what I have right now:
__FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c,v 1.9.2.9 2007/02/11 03:31:18
mohans Exp $);
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.170.2.7 2007/02/11 03:31:19 mohans Exp $
* $FreeBSD: src/sys/vm/uma.h,v 1.22.2.8 2007/02/11 03:31:19
viper wrote:
Hi all.
I am just want ask question only out of curiosity.
Are there any reasons why a file src/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c(rev. 1.165.2.6) is
not included to RELEASE_6_2?
What a kind of race condition closing that revision.
Thanks to help me :-)
The changeset was MFC'ed and we need
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Hi,
This isn't the answer, but I'm attempting to provide triage for jhb who
will probably look at it.
This is a GPF, but it's not being caused by an attempt to enter
protected mode, so it isn't the most-often reported BTX issue.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6.2R cd
LI Xin wrote:
LI Xin wrote:
Hi,
It seems that threaded perl is broken on 6.2-RELEASE and 7-CURRENT. I
have tried some option combinations with no luck, if WITH_THREADED=yes
is specified then the build would fail with a coredump.
Another observation is that this happens with 6.2-RELEASE
Felippe de Meirelles Motta wrote:
Hi people,
Somebody already got problems with PERC 5/i controller, stopping during
the boot ?
Reading the last message, i dont known the possible problem, look:
mfi0: 587 (223981812s/0x0001/-1) - VD 00/0 progress 2% in 48s:
Background Initialization
Thomas Roberts wrote:
How important is it to include Linux binary
compatibility when installing 6.2-RELEASE? I am
guessing it is only needed if I want to use an
application that was compiled by/for Linux, but I am
new to FreeBSD so I will be using it mostly for:
1 - learning the system
Hi, Daniel,
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I have some Supermicro P8SCT based systems I would like to run 6.2 on,
unfortunately something between 6.1 and 6.2 has broken bge on this board.
This board has 2 bge's and the first one is on before the BIOS hands off to
the OS (I can see the activity
Oles Hnatkevych wrote:
Hello!
Just cvsup-ed and upgraded to 6.2-STABLE.
The box has hyperthreading processor:
# more /var/run/dmesg.boot |grep -i cpu
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (3000.37-MHz 686-class CPU)
Logical CPUs per core: 2
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System
Jeff Royle wrote:
Jeff Royle wrote:
I could use some advice on this issue I have had with my raid controller.
I am not really running much on the system yet, postfix, Pf + pflogd,
rlogind, ssh, bsnmp and ntpd. While I was just reading a file with
less the system stopped responding. I
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 19, 2007, at 11:52 AM, LI Xin wrote:
I have some preliminary work on merging the Adaptec driver:
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/for_review/patch-aac-vendor-b11518
But one of the reviewers has advised me to request boarder testing,
especially against old
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
In the cvs repository, there has appeared src/lib/ncurses, which seems
to be a copy of lib/libncurses. Is this meant to be?
Yes, this is a repo-copy in preparation of ncurses update.
BTW. I think the files appeared on -HEAD, no?
Cheers,
--
Xin LI [EMAIL
KAWAGUTI Ginga wrote:
Hi.
I'm using FreeBSD/i386 6-stable on HP DL360G5 server,
and getting Watchdog timeout link state changed to DOWN/UP
messages shown below.
bce0: /usr/src/sys/dev/bce/if_bce.c(5000): Watchdog timeout occurred,
resetting!
bce0: link state changed to DOWN
bce0:
Mars G. Miro wrote:
Greetz!
I happen to play w/ a newish Gigabyte mobo that has an on-board
Marvell 8053 GigE NIC. FreeBSD 6.2-BETA2 i386, amd64 does not seem to
support it. Does anyone know if this is supported? I'm currently
taking a look at http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/msk/ , tho
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
Yes, I saw the thread and I did a cvsup prior to rebuilding everything.
What I'm asking about is the best way to get the system working again.
Is it a reinstall, or is there a simple way to put a working kernel
in?
Simplest way would be to boot from
Mars G. Miro wrote:
On 1/9/07, LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mars G. Miro wrote:
Greetz!
I happen to play w/ a newish Gigabyte mobo that has an on-board
Marvell 8053 GigE NIC. FreeBSD 6.2-BETA2 i386, amd64 does not seem to
support it. Does anyone know if this is supported? I'm
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
If memory serves me right, LI Xin wrote:
Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 16:01 +0100, Thomas Herrlin wrote:
It still runs networking daemons into a frozen zoneli state on
heavy/(D)DOS network loads. Such processes cant be kill-9ed so there is
no way to recover from
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I got the following Filesystem:
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
/dev/da0a 1.3T422G823G34% 565952 1828334700%
Running of a 3ware 9550, on a dual core Opteron 242 with 1Gb.
The system is used as SMB/NFS
wsk wrote:
hi, scsi card connected to a disk array.and get follow error after less
than 10 days
thanks in advance.
You did not mentioned which release are you using...
BTW. Have you tried if lowering down the connection speed (i.e. use
160M/s instead of 320M/s) would make things better? If
Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 16:01 +0100, Thomas Herrlin wrote:
It still runs networking daemons into a frozen zoneli state on
heavy/(D)DOS network loads. Such processes cant be kill-9ed so there is
no way to recover from it. (think frozen sshd and a very remote/headless
server).
Hi, Nikolay,
Our local customer has applied the following and it seems to have
'solved' their problem on squid:
echo kern.ipc.nmbclusters=0 /boot/loader.conf
and then reboot. They have been running with the 20061212 patch but I
suspect that it's no longer necessary. The feedback I have
The point of MFC'ing cpio(1) changes is that it has fixed some old bugs
that can potentially damage user data.
Personally I'd rather replace it with the BSD pax(1) found in the base
system, if we had a proper GNU cpio(1) test suite to make sure that we
did not break something. It might be
Ilya Vishnyakov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Problem with truss, won't start. Please advise me what to do.
truss /bin/echo hello truss: truss: cannot open /proc/42520/mem cannot
open /proc/curproc/mem: : No such file or directory
No such file or directory
uname -a
Olivier Mueller wrote:
Le 29 nov. 06 à 01:34, Scott Long a écrit :
I just merged the fixes into RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_2. Thanks for
the reminder.
thanks, but what about RELENG_6_1? Under freebsd 6.1 it is still not
coming:
I have this in my cvsup file:*default release=cvs
hshh wrote:
Hi,
My FreeBSD server panic while running SMP kernel. All work fine if
disable SMP feature.
uname log: http://upload.hshh.org/homes/hshh/temp/panic/uname.log
My kernel conf: http://upload.hshh.org/homes/hshh/temp/panic/kernel.log
Backtrace log:
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
No luck at all.
patch-zonelim-drain-20061212 works for me as a previos one.
no panics, but still zoneli.
All this is very odd, because other two squid servers works
perfectly in the same loadbalancer with out any patches and
kernel panics. I think that the case with
Hi,
Would you please give the following patch a try?
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-zonelim-drain
Note: Please revert my previous patch against sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c.
This patch should be applied against sys/vm/ [RELENG_6 or RELENG_6_2],
it schedules a drain of uma zones when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a script where we start a nttcp for some 500 nttcp client in back
ground. After some time I could see the nttcp clients are listed in the
TOP command as Zoneli state. Can any one please let me know what is
meant by Zoneli state?
Test Script:
=
Hi, Nikolay,
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Monday, 11 December 2006 at 15:59:03 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
Hi,
Would you please give the following patch a try?
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-zonelim-drain
Note: Please revert my previous patch against sys/kern/kern_mbuf.c.
This patch
Hi, Nikolay,
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 December 2006 at 2:59:37 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
Hi, Nikolay,
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Monday, 11 December 2006 at 15:59:03 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
Hi,
Would you please give the following patch a try?
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Friday, 24 November 2006 at 11:11:48 +0800, LI Xin wrote:
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Thursday, 23 November 2006 at 20:24:15 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:55:49 +0200, Nikolay Pavlov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi.
It seems i have
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Thursday, 23 November 2006 at 20:24:15 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:55:49 +0200, Nikolay Pavlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
It seems i have a deadlock on 6.2-PRERELEASE.
This is squid server in accelerator mode.
I can easily trigger
To quote the original post:
Hi,
I have a script where we start a nttcp for some 500 nttcp client in back
ground. After some time I could see the nttcp clients are listed in the
TOP command as Zoneli state. Can any one please let me know what is
meant by Zoneli state?
Test Script:
=
Lawrence Farr wrote:
I'd like to install stable directly onto a 6Tb Areca array, and
have run out of clues how to do it. In the past I've always
used a separate boot volume that was small enough for sysinstall
to work with, but I have no space to fit more drives in this
chassis. I've tried
Randy Bush wrote:
do folk actually successfully upgrade
# uname -a
FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41:24 GMT
2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using the
instructions in
LI Xin wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:
do folk actually successfully upgrade
# uname -a
FreeBSD psg.com 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #15: Sun Oct 1 18:41:24 GMT
2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
to RELENG_6 *safely* on a many-user production system using
68 matches
Mail list logo
