On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:15:27 +0200, Marko Lerota mler...@claresco.hr
wrote:
Pete French petefre...@ingresso.co.uk writes:
Am impressed - I didnt realise it was possible at all under amd64! I
ended up using 'gnash' which doesnt really do the job to be honest,
but it better than nothing. These
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:42:40 +0200, Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
Thanks for the notice.
Just a thank you message for the v15 development, MFS and this fast
fix. Maybe this is
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:42:36 +0200, Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:42:40 +0200, Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
I have fixed
Hi Adam,
Am 12.07.10 19:11, schrieb Adam Vande More:
Automated installations have existed on FreeBSD for a long time. You can do
this either via netboot or CD based media. Also rolling your own FreeBSD
media with custom changes is trivial compared the linux distro's I'm familar
with. I
Am 12.07.10 19:37, schrieb Mikhail T.:
12.07.2010 13:11, Adam Vande More wrote:
Roll it into your media
You lost me right here... Rolling one's own media (for every release
and release-candidate) may be Ok for someone in charge of making, at
least, several installations per week.
For
Am 07.07.10 22:52, schrieb Mikhail T.:
07.07.2010 16:34, Randi Harper ???(??):
Attached is the kernel config-file (i386), that worked fine under
7.x. The
kernel-compile will break (some *freebsd7* structs undefined),
without the
COMPAT_FREEBSD7 option. Try it for yourself...
Don't
Hi jhell,
ehm...
Am 08.07.10 14:46, wrote jhell:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/2010 06:54, for whatever Marian Hettwer wrote:
I certainly not wrote the text below. That's what, I guess, you wrote.
Your MUA is defect.
And honestly, I don't know why that's a reply
Hi All,
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:21:56 +0100, Oliver Brandmueller o...@e-gitt.net
wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed somthing: I setup an 8.0-RELEASE amd64 box, / is default
512M. First step after setup was to csup to RELENG_8 and buildkernel and
buildworld (no custom kernel, no make.conf).
Hej Marcel,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:46:27 -0800, Marcel Moolenaar xcl...@mac.com
wrote:
Yes, if you have ad2a and not ad2s1a, then you have a
proper dangerously dedicated disk and FreeBSD 8.x will
work correctly with your disk.
If you installed dangerously dedicated and ended up
with
Hej Ho,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:55:38 +0200, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 16/12/2009 11:28 Marian Hettwer said the following:
Hej Marcel,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:46:27 -0800, Marcel Moolenaar xcl...@mac.com
wrote:
Yes, if you have ad2a and not ad2s1a, then you have a
proper
Hi Folks,
today I did an update from 7.2-RELEASE-p4 to 8.0-RELEASE using
freebsd-update.
Everything went smooth, apart from the fact that I can't mount my second
disk.
It's all a bit puzzling...
Here are the facts:
[r...@talisker ~]# cat /etc/fstab
# DeviceMountpointFStype
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:08:32 +0200, Harald Weis ha...@free.fr wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
Building lxdvdrip stops because linux-pango has known
vulnerabilities.
You can ignore
Hi Folks,
I'm having trouble getting the nvidia.ko recognizing my nvidia card.
As far as I understood the nvidia website, the card itself should be
supported.
To the facts:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0:0: class=0x03 card=0x023810de chip=0x00fe10de
rev=0xa2 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Nvidia
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:55:30 +0100, Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:22:42AM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen typed:
Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:21:11PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein typed:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:01:00AM -0500, Stephen Clark
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:45:12 +0200, Aragon Gouveia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| By Eduardo Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [ 2008-10-30 00:04 +0200 ]
Hello,
I need to write a cgi script which will print the output from ps(1) in
a table (html), so the
Hi All,
I'm testing 7.1 Prerelease right now and am having difficulties to get my
xorg with nvidia up and running.
I updated from:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~uname -a
FreeBSD motor.mobile.rz 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 4
16:54:32 CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
nvidia0: [ITHREAD]
Something is odd here...
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:00:32 +0200, Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm testing 7.1 Prerelease right now and am having difficulties to get my
xorg with nvidia up and running.
I updated from:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Dan,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 08:45:00 -0600, Dan Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You may be interested to know, however, that some people ALSO use it
as a desktop system. ;-)
I second that! :)
I for one really love FreeBSD on a server, 'cause it has a (to me) perfect
setup of tools to use on a
Hej Guido,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:07:36 +0200, Guido Falsi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:58:27AM -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
I hope everyone realizes that I am not trying to de-server FreeBSD. I
just remember how daunting it was for me to get X setup when all I
wanted to
Hi Gavin,
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:30:47 -0700, Gavin Spomer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, not sure. Head spinning now. ;)
1. I have a Mac, SuSE server and a FreeBSD server.
2. I can ssh from my Mac to SuSE server without having to type in my
password.
3. I can ssh from my Mac to FreeBSD
Hi Folks,
I'm using lagg(4) on some of our servers and I'm just wondering how the
failover is implemented.
The manpage isn't quite clear:
failover Sends and receives traffic only through the master port.
If
the master port becomes unavailable, the next active port
is
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:55:52 +0800, Eugene Grosbein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:37:15PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
I'm using lagg(4) on some of our servers and I'm just wondering how the
failover is implemented.
The manpage isn't quite clear:
failover
Hi Pete,
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:30:12 +0100, Pete French
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, IMO lacp doesn't solve that problem. lacp is used for link
aggregation, not failover.
It does both - if one of the links becomes unavailable then it will
stop using it. We use this for failover and it
Hi Max,
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:00:18 +0200, Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats unfortunate...
bonding in Linux is capable of doing this and solaris too.
Well then. At least everythings clear now. And in the end, clarifing
things
was the reason for that mail thread :)
You are looking
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:03:07 +1000, Peter Jeremy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-Aug-12 13:43:29 +0200, Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lagg is to handle failover at the physical layer for when one of your
ether ports fails, or someone unplugs a cable. If I understand you
Hi Oliver,
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:18:36 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
Pete French wrote:
The bce driver is not properly generating link state events.
OK, that explains why it doesnt failover - but why does looking at
it
with
.1.irq=4
hint.sio.0.at=isa
hint.sio.0.port=0x2F8
hint.sio.0.irq=3
Looks reasonable to me. I'll give it a shot.
Thank you :)
best regards,
Marian
On Jul 1, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
I installed a recent (as of today) RELENG_7 on one of our HP Blades.
Unluckily my serial output
Hi there,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 23:36:51 -0700, Ulf Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also remember that the blades have 2 serial ports, one can be accessed
via
a dongle in the front of the blade and I believe that is what usual would
be
called COM1 by default. The virtual serial via ilo takes
Hi Jeremy,
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:27:41 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 12:16:41AM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
I'll bet you that sio is deciding that com1 or not, it's sio1 (not sio0)
which can be fixed with the changes I mention below.
On Jul 1, 2008, at
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:16:41 -0700, Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll bet you that sio is deciding that com1 or not, it's sio1 (not
sio0) which can be fixed with the changes I mention below.
puuuh, well, with your suggested change, I do get a login prompt now (at
ttyd1 it says), but I
Hi All,
I installed a recent (as of today) RELENG_7 on one of our HP Blades.
Unluckily my serial output stops right when a getty at ttyd0 should kick
in. So I'm blind for the rest of the startup.
Very unfortunate.
The boot menu, as the bootup itself is printed out on serial console until:
da0:
Hi there,
some thoughts to your problem in regards to Debian administration time
needed vs. FreeBSD administration time needed.
I believe I can make a point there, since I have 600 debian boxes under my
hood but still am a FreeBSD advocate ;-)
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:53:02 +0300, Anton - Valqk
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:50:57 +0300, Anton - Valqk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for the answer!
I'm glad someone answered me a human way,
because two times before, I wasn't answered that way
(well... my posts were angry and incomplete but...that's why i didn't
continued to post...my bad).
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:54:02 +0100 (BST), Robert Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The place for volunteers to come in is where they see an obvious niche
for
improvement -- for example, a few years ago this guy named Colin Percival
turned up with a binary update system. After a couple of
Hi there,
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:35:51 +0200, Mikkel Skærris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My system is a IBM T40 laptop, and i has been running FreeBSD for more
than two years without ANY problems at all. But a couple of days ago
The most obvious one would be bad hardware.
my 7.0 intallation
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:39:55 +, Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Jared Carlson wrote:
Hi I have a question about startup scripts for BSD distributions.
Can you turn off the file system check that occurs every 30 boots,
etc? I
Hi Jared,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT), Jared Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I have a question about startup scripts for BSD distributions. Can
you
turn off the file system check that occurs every 30 boots, etc? I recall
At least in FreeBSD there is no file system checks
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:38:32 +, Kimi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/01/2008, Drew Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would have been, or would be nice if they could make an alias to
'the first Ethernet controller' (i.e. eth0). So that you could reference
it
in such a way when there
Hi Jeremy,
Jeremy Chadwick schrieb:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:12:15PM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
here's a snipped of a verbose boot:
sio0: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio0: port may not be enabled
This is somewhat normal (depends on the system), and can
Jeremy Chadwick schrieb:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:42:33AM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
Change this to -S9600 -Dh, and remove the lines from /boot/loader.conf.
did that.
Still no login prompt via serial console. Although my getty is running:
More hints on what's going
Hi Ho,
Jeremy Chadwick schrieb:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:50:07PM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
marian46-23# stty -a -f /dev/ttyd0
speed 9600 baud; 0 rows; 0 columns;
lflags: icanon isig iexten echo echoe -echok echoke -echonl echoctl
-echoprt -altwerase -noflsh -tostop -flusho
Hi All,
I thought of helping out beta testing FreeBSD 7.0, so I gave it a shot on one
of our HP BL465c G1 blades.
Problem is, serial output stops right before the login prompt should kick in.
Thats sad... I need serial output (don't wanna go with the crappy Java applet
for VGA output).
So
Hi Squirrel (odd name that is...),
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:54:53 -0500, Squirrel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason, my port 1645 is closed on FreeBSD 6.2. I have all the
firewall disabled, but it's not allowing me access the port 1645. How do
you manually open this port? I can't seem
Hi there,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:31:00 -0500, Scott Oertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Decibel! wrote:
Is there anything like top, but for filesystem activity? Google hasn't
turned up anything...
check out gstat
I like that one a lot :)
I missed it always when I'm administrating linux boxes.
Hi there,
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:06:54 +0100, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I work for a little web agency/isp and we are going to buy new hw to
sustain the growinng demand of our customers.
We're 100% FreeBSD-only and i was looking to buy IBM blade servers: can
anyone reccomend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej Ho,
for quite a while my server (root server / dedicated server) goes
completely dead - sometimes after several weeks, sometimes after 24h hours.
I always thought it's the hosting company and not FreeBSD, but today I
could see the panic.
Looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej there,
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I think I might have found *at least* one of the problems, and that
being the excessively high blocked states while ps isn't finding
anything ...
MySQL
We just recently started allowing clients to run a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Scott Long wrote:
Brent Casavant wrote:
While I find ports to be the single most useful feature of the FreeBSD
experience, and can't thank contributors enough for the efforts, I on
the other hand find updating my installed ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ion,
Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote:
I have to agree on that statement. I would love to see branched ports.
This can get very important on servers, were you don't want to have
major upgrades, but only security updates.
I guess it's a question of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Albert Shih wrote:
Le 27/03/2006 à 07:46:04-0300, JoaoBR a écrit
is your card in polling mode ?
Well I don't known what's that mean. I just look the ifconfig's man...I
just use default config, and I don't think I use poling mode.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Stephan Koenig writes:
| Does anyone know of an easy way to get temperature information out of
| a Dell PowerEdge 1550/1650/1750/1850/2650/2850 running FreeBSD4/5/6?
|
| Something that has a very simple CLI that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej there,
Atanas wrote:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav said the following on 02/15/06 23:35:
David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Last year I already had to decrease the LoginGraceTime from 120 to 30
seconds on my production boxes, but it didn't help
Hej there,
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:27:18PM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
I'm actually wondering how yahoo for instance handles this situation. To
my knowledge, they have several thousand of FreeBSD based servers.
Either they are all the same in regards to configuration
Hi there,
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:20:13AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
So, uhh, how would your magical binary upgrade system handle custom kernels?
Why would it be any different? You still haven't explained how this would
work..
Versioning of the core package would
Hi there,
Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
I'm thinking about getting the machine with a DRAC4 remote management card.
This looks to be OS-independent (you can configure through the BIOS) so I
expect it will just work. I've seen various posts talking about how it
tends to take over the
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Marian Hettwer wrote:
I don't know about the DRAC with FreeBSD, but I assume that the BIOS of
this Dell still supports BIOS redirection to serial port. If so, you can
have Monitor and Keyboard connected locally and use the serial console
Ralph Hempel wrote:
I've never enabled the DRAC card on any dell I have that came with
them...
Hmmm. The DRAC card can save you a long drive sometimes. You actually
get to look at the hardware boot process and can even adjust
BIOS settings if needed. To get to a FreeBSD console, I
Hej there,
Ralph Hempel wrote:
Yes, you get that too. Full hardware power down. Wait as long as
you want, then power the machine up. It's not the same as a remote
reboot where you HOPE the server comes up far enough to get
a console session.
Well, if the BIOS can do console redirection, the
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
alternativly to check out wether it's dns related, you use set the
Option UseDNS no in your sshd_config, so sshd won't try a reverse
dns lookup.
Give it a shoot. Usually ssh timeouts are related to DNS...
That should be a last
Hej there,
Kobi Shmueli wrote:
Try checking /etc/resolv.conf on oboe first, adding a static entry to
/etc/hosts of the remote ip/host should speed dns checks as well.
You can also run ssh in verbose mode (ssh -v oboe) or/and run sshd in debug
mode (sshd -d).
alternativly to check out wether
Hi there,
short additional step:
Claus Guttesen wrote:
The easiest would be to
1. cvsup to RELENG_6 (or RELENG_6_0)
1.1 cd /usr/obj; chflags noschg *; rm -rf *
2. cd /usr/src
3. make buildworld
4. make buildkernel
5. make installkernel
6. mergemaster -p
7. reboot into single-usermode and
Colin Percival wrote:
Tom Grove wrote:
Richard Bejtlich wrote:
After speaking with Colin, he mentioned that IPSec, NAT, and disk
quotas (enabled via options QUOTA) are the three most popular kernel
changes that prevent people from running GENERIC and hence using
freebsd-update for binary
Hej Dave,
Dave Fazio wrote:
In my opinion, this page will help popularize FreeBSD more than the
older (adding graphical installer would help too -- hint hint).
a graphical installer may help desktop users, but is totally unusable
for server installations where you either want to install
Hej Dave,
Dave Fazio wrote:
Totally agree and understand your point -- a graphical install option
would mainly appeal to desktop users. But let's be honest; considering
the competition install base of Red Hat, Mac OS X, SUN, and (ech!)
Windows, the day of GUI deskop'd servers is here now;
Hej Scot,
Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 8/15/05, Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the SCSI controller (some kind of) worked before, I'd really like
to know what had happened and why it doesn't work anymore ...
I can help testing, since this machine is a testing machine only :-)
Try
Hi there,
peceka wrote:
Hi,
has anyone used IPMI (BMC) with x346 and FreeBSD successful?
Today i've configured with bmc_cfg.exe all BMC options and when server
is in DOS mode i can log in to it and reboot it. But when FBSD stand
up connection to BMC is lost.
In IBM help desk some technicans
Hi,
Jonguk Kim wrote:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
I think 'Option Buttons 5' can help you.
nope, didn't do the trick. But thanks for the suggestion anyway :)
Strange thing though, same config worked under RELENG_5 without problems.
My mouse works under RELENG_6.
my ps:
imonu@/usr/my# ps ax
Hej jonguk,
Jonguk Kim wrote:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
from /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Section InputDevice
Identifier Mouse0
Driver mouse
Option Protocol auto
Option Device /dev/sysmouse
I think 'Option Buttons 5' can help you.
nope, didn't do
Hej All,
I upgraded to RELENG_6 to help testing.
Everything went smooth so far, but my scroll wheel in X isn't working
anymore. I didn't changed anything regarding the configuration from
FreeBSD RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 ...
some details:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ uname -a
FreeBSD beastie.mobile.rz
On Mi, 11.05.2005, 14:34, Steven Jurczyk sagte:
**Using SCHED_ULE on SMP/HT machine broke applications which use
libpthread/libthr, probably at context switching between threads... The
applications simply hang and they aren't killable (kill -9 pid don't
work).. Usually this also break kernel
On Fr, 1.04.2005, 16:59, Irina sagte:
Hello everybody,
Hi there,
I had 5.3 STABLE. Did cvsup as I always do with
*default tag=RELENG_5
After rebooting and telneting to the server I saw
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE (INET) #4: Thu Mar 31 20:41:59 EST 2005
Where is it coming from? Does
Hej there,
Rob wrote:
Hi,
I thought 386 support had been removed since 5.X. But
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/installation-i386.html
says:
1.2 Hardware Requirements
FreeBSD for the i386 requires a 486 or better processor to install
and run (although FreeBSD can run on 386 processors
top post:
forget it. It's Friday, and I'm not tired. I just oversaw that you asked
how to get FreeBSD running on a 386 then...
sorry :)
Marian Hettwer wrote:
Hej there,
Rob wrote:
Hi,
I thought 386 support had been removed since 5.X. But
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/installation-i386
Hi Zsold,
Zsolt Bognar wrote:
Hello,
I have one FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE server, that recently started to behave
strangely. It is respones all ping request and I can change between consoles
and the ftp and mysql server response (but I can't login).
In the last week, it happened three-times.
So, the
Hi Paolo,
just a short guess,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
i've problem trying to login on a freebsd-stable box using ssh and pub key
authentication.
If i try to login from a linux box i got this msg in my log:
fatal: monitor_read: unsupported request: 24
this only happen if i try to
75 matches
Mail list logo
