Artem Kuchin wrote:
the number do not change with or without PAE
No need, i know this stuff.
Hmmm :-)
Problem is that asus p5p800-vm bios does not have such option
(no memory remapping support in chipset)
, so, and simply assumed that in PAE mode this simply
does not matter and it
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Apr 21 18:01:30 osiris kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz
(3000.33-MHz 686-class CPU)
Why bother with PAE on a CPU that is 64-bit capable and can run the
amd64 version of FreeBSD 6.2?
/Martin
___
Karel Miklav wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I think this has been discussed before. The problem is that FreeBSD's
bootloader doesn't support booting off of such devices, thus you
need to use GRUB or another bootloader.
But the guy from tutorial is doing that, and I made such a stick too.
Scott Long skrev:
In any case, SCHED_ULE is still considered to be highly experimental.
Hopefully it will get some more attention in the near future to
bring it closer to production quality.
Can we have a commit (at least to STABLE) that adds a big fat message
during boot that goes
Jeremy Chadwick skrev:
An alternate idea: remove SCHED_ULE from the GENERIC kernel config
and instead make a ULE config which can be included (similar to
SMP and PAE).
The problem with ULE is that it works so well that you enable it and
forget it. Then a couple of months later you find
Just an observation.
All the boxes I've had this problem on have _two_ em interfaces. I have
never seen it on my boxes with just one em NIC.
The error is always em0 timeout - never em1 (I haven't seen any!)
Yesterday my local network got completely wacky, the gateway had em0
timeouts on the
Albert Chin wrote:
The arrays are configured with write-thru write policy, adaptive
read policy, and cachedio cache policy.
cachedio will slow you down on the old LSI cards. Only enable it on the
PCI-X and above adapters.
/Martin
___
mailbox# uname -a
FreeBSD mailbox 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Sep 22
00:31:29 CEST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj-local/usr/src/sys/SMP amd64
I get tons of these:
em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
em0: link state changed to DOWN
em0: link state changed to UP
mailbox#
I'm also seeing these on a Supermicro PDSMi board with a recent stable.
Please tell me what debugging info that is needed to fix this.
/Martin
FreeBSD mailbox 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Sun Sep 10
17:43:15 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj-local/usr/src/sys/SMP amd64
Hans Lambermont wrote:
Why not rename 'stable' into 'stable-api' ?
.. or just stop calling it STABLE and call it RELENG_6 instead, which is
what you are actually fetching from cvs :-)
/Martin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Freddie Cash wrote:
We've been bitten bad by these cards. LSI MegaRAID 150-6 SATA RAID
controllers (PCI-X format). The management tools are crap, the
throughput is crap, the onboard SATA chipset is a Silicon Image.
The design is three years old and is showing its age. Their performance
is
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 22:01, Mike Jakubik wrote:
I'm getting a ton of them now, and i found a way to reproduce them.
Basically i run a compile session in one terminal, say make buildkernel,
and run top in another. As soon as i run top, the messages appear, and
they seem
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Even if the identification can't be done automatically, it still seems
like it would be good to start identifying ports that don't support -O
by hand, and having the ports force a correct -O setting. Most ports
support -O2 (if not -O3), and it would be nice if people could
Karl Denninger wrote:
Update - it appears that as long as I only use ONE of the two channels on
the card, it works ok.
That explains why I only got _one_ SATA cable with the $20 SiL 3112 card
i bought last year :-)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
In all honesty, I'm getting somewhat irritated by all the
dd is meaningless performance measurement tool, use something
real and similar arguments: dd is a real command for real
work, and if it shows abysmal performance of sequential writes,
then
Michael Schuh wrote:
# cd /; /usr/bin/time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024 count=1024k of=zerofile;
I would only compare the performace from 2 Versions of FreeBSD, while
i mean that the performance from RELENG_5 is more slower than under
GENTOO and it is double as slow as under RELENG_4.
Let me guess:
is going to give you bad
performance.
Regards,
Martin
--
Martin Nilsson, CTO Founder, Mullet Scandinavia AB, Malmö, SWEDEN
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Phone: +46-(0)708-606170, Web: www.mullet.se
Our business is well engineered servers optimised for FreeBSD Linux
Anybody running a recent 5.3-stable amd64 on a box with lots of memory,
and does it work?
From very brief testing a Dual Opteron with 12GB memory just reboots
when the kenel probes devices. SATA disks on built in SiL 3114
controller. 5.3-stable from yesterday compiled with -O, the system works
. It is very
annoying when using buildworld to see if a newly built machine is
working OK.
--
Martin Nilsson, CTO Founder, Mullet Scandinavia AB, Malmö, SWEDEN
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Phone: +46-(0)708-606170, Web: www.mullet.se
Our business is well engineered servers optimised for FreeBSD
--
_
| o | +---+ +---+ | o |
| | | Martin Nilsson M.Sc. CSE | |Internet Intranet| | |
| o | | Svenska Butiker AB,SWEDEN | | Applications shopping. | | o |
| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | UNIX, TCP/IP
20 matches
Mail list logo
