Debug question

and more so it should be okay. However, gdb kernel vmcore.0 tells me that vmcore.0 is not a core dump :-( Any hints? Regards, Mipam. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe

Re: Debug question

Thanks, when i do what you suggested i get: kgdb: bad namelist. Is the corefile unusuable? Regards, Mipam. On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Rink Springer wrote: Hi, On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:56:00AM +0200, Mipam wrote: My swap is large enough to cover the whole memory and more so it should be okay

Re: FreeBSD 5.4 SMP kernels now available via FreeBSD Update

Thanks for the kernel. What parameters did you change in your SMP kernel. Just curious, surely gonna try your kernel. :-) Thanks, Mipam. On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Colin Percival wrote: It sounds like the SMP kernel I provided for FreeBSD 5.3 was quite popular, so I've started building an SMP

Re: em and bge driver MPSAFE?

Thanks for your clear response, yes i was looking for 5.x indeed. Driver status for 5.x would be very nice indeed, i guess more guys are interested in such? If someone provides me with info, i'm willing text for the busdma page you mentioned so that 5.x is also included. Bye, Mipam. On Sat, 21

em and bge driver MPSAFE?

Hi, Perhaps lame to ask, But are the em and bge driver MPSAFE? I couldn't find notes about being mpsafe in the man pages of these drivers? Bye, Mipam. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

RELENG_5 frozen tomorrow?

Hi, In the planning i saw that the RELENG_5 source would be frozen feb 2. Will this still happen or not? Just curious, Mipam. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any

Re: RELENG_5 frozen tomorrow?

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:13:32 +0100 (MET), Mipam mipam at ibb.net wrote: In the planning i saw that the RELENG_5 source would be frozen feb 2. Will this still happen or not? That was a month ago... Yes, but any reasons that this date will not be met? http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R

problems compiling 5-stable

. *** Error code 1 Any hints what i could do to remedy this or another way to upgrade? Bye, Mipam. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PREEMPTION problems with em driver on smp machine

preemption. Oh yes, the release is 5-stable (RELENG_5 source from feb 8.) Btw, i use the 4bsd scheduler on this machine, not ule (yet). dmesg output from the machine: (i only use the em card, the fxp cards are not used). Bye, Mipam. Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980

using ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES savely?

free or not yet? Bye, Mipam. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Does this mean trouble?

Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #4: Tue Feb 8 14:41:10 CET 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Mipam Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality

giantless vfs on RELENG_5

Hi, Has vfs without giant already been imported in releng_5? Is it activated by default or must it be activated by setting a kernel option or sysctl? Bye, Mipam. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

ULE status

Hi, I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch. Beneath is one of them: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not? Bye, Mipam. ___ freebsd

Re: ULE status

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote: On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote: Hi, I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch. Beneath is one of them: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html Is the ULE scheduler still

Re: ULE status

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote: On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:38, Mipam wrote: Okay, so then the ULE sched is fairly stable then? But it's still not the default scheduler? It will never become the default scheduler in 5.x again. 5.x went into -STABLE mode with 4BSD

Re: ULE status

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote: On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 14:02, Mipam wrote: Okay clear, but the fact that it's in 5-stable suggests the it's stable to use, else why would it be in 5-stable. The changes that have been merged to stable have been tested for some time

Re: ULE status

can i find it? Bye, Mipam. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

backward compat in /etc/fstab?

or will the compatibility mode be removed so that proper permissions and ownership can be set in an fstab entry? Bye, Mipam. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any

calcru: negative runtime

, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Mon Dec 27 19:16:11 CET 2004 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Mipam ACPI APIC Table: COMPAQ 0083 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) III

nmbcluster change

put kern.ipc.nmbclusters=65535 in /boot/loader.conf in order to reach the same result? Setting this value to 0, what does this do? Bye, Mipam. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe

preemption stable under 5.3?

Hi, Is the preemption stable under 5.3 release? Can i savely enable it under 5.3? Latest i heard that in combination with the ule scheduler it didnt work well and wasnt stable. Bye, Mipam. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: preemption stable under 5.3?

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Emanuel Strobl wrote: Am Montag, 8. November 2004 11:56 schrieb Mipam: Hi, Is the preemption stable under 5.3 release? Can i savely enable it under 5.3? Latest i heard that in combination with the ule scheduler it didnt work well and wasnt stable. ULE

Release date 5-stable

, Mipam. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: unable to mount swap backed device

this: drwxrwxrwt 3 rootwheel every time after reboot the permissions are the same again. Anyway, to get around this? Bye, Mipam. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any