Re: Best way to switch from Linux to BSD

2011-03-29 Thread Paul Schmehl
servers are FreeBSD. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication

Re: Best way to switch from Linux to BSD

2011-03-29 Thread Paul Schmehl
support is lacking when compared to the other major OSes (Windows, Mac and Linux). You can make it work, if you want to, but that's not what its primary function is. If you want a user friendly desktop OS, FreeBSD is probably not your best choice. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst

Re: Best way to switch from Linux to BSD

2011-03-29 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On March 29, 2011 7:27:26 PM +0200 Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 11:43 -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: FreeBSD is first and foremost a server OS. Could you support your claim with some examples, please? Seriously? Visit Netcraft. Desktop support

Re: Best way to switch from Linux to BSD

2011-03-29 Thread Paul Schmehl
ridiculous your argument becomes. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer

Re: Best way to switch from Linux to BSD

2011-03-29 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On March 29, 2011 2:37:07 PM -0500 Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote: Go to Youtube and see if you can watch a video.  Ubuntu does it out of the box.  FreeBSD only does it after you tweak and tweak

Re: Best way to switch from Linux to BSD

2011-03-29 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On March 29, 2011 3:20:48 PM -0500 Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.comwrote: Or just follow the instructions. If people really find that difficult I'm not sure any OS is going to be the answer long term

Re: Xorg keyboard and mouse hung

2009-06-10 Thread Paul Schmehl
dbus_enable=YES and hald_enable=YES to /etc/rc.conf. Then start them both manually (/usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald start and /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbus start). Then restart X (Ctrl-Alt-Bkspc) -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those

Re: Building 7.2-STABLE from 7.2-RELEASE

2009-05-24 Thread Paul Schmehl
they introduced some new zfsboot stuff into the -Stable branch - could that have anything to do with it? Yes. Tinderbox started reporting the error last night. I assume it will be fixed soon. Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer

Re: Radeon 9250 DRM in 7.2-RELEASE

2009-05-04 Thread Paul Schmehl
-- Paul Schmehl (pa...@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

Re: changing a ports final destination via make knobs question...

2008-08-26 Thread Paul Schmehl
* subsequently installed port. Chris' suggestion to use make install PREFIX=/usr/local/php5 is the correct one for changing the location of a single port. Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ** WARNING

Re: changing a ports final destination via make knobs question...

2008-08-26 Thread Paul Schmehl
/php5', } Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ** WARNING: Check the headers before replying

Re: ssh-keygen between SuSE and FreeBSD

2008-08-13 Thread Paul Schmehl
a passphrase to this one? Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ** WARNING: Check the headers before replying

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 and BIND exploit

2008-07-22 Thread Paul Schmehl
solution to the response forgery problem, it just can't be deployed universally before 8/5). What happens on 8/5? -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 and BIND exploit

2008-07-22 Thread Paul Schmehl
. Too many ways to forget to do it. (I did the same for the root servers so that named.ca gets updated automagically every month.) But until root is signed, it's not worth it for those of us who don't have dedicated staff doing dns only. -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 and BIND exploit

2008-07-22 Thread Paul Schmehl
. BTW, I think without those scripts (or at least examples) you'll find adoption will be a great deal slower. Many people that need to run dns are far from experts and often intimidated by its complexity - especially the complexity of dnssec. -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious

Re: FreeBSD 7.1 and BIND exploit

2008-07-22 Thread Paul Schmehl
are and what my maintenance responsibilities are. Paul Schmehl If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer.

Re: named.conf: query-source address

2008-07-16 Thread Paul Schmehl
public IPs for aliases is usually wasteful of IP address space. YMMV... I would have thought that the most common reason for setting up multiple aliases on an interface was for hosting multiple domains on a single server. At least that's why I do it. Paul Schmehl If it isn't already obvious

Re: UMASS problem on 7.0 STABLE

2008-07-10 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:50:25 +0200 Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:27:26 +0200, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ever since I upgraded this workstation to 7.0 STABLE, I have been unable to reboot with my USB hard drive attached. During the boot

Any idea when a bind update will be forthcoming?

2008-07-10 Thread Paul Schmehl
Given the serious nature of the vulnerability, I'm sure this is at the top of someone's list. Do we have a scheduled release date yet? -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ___ freebsd

Re: UMASS problem on 7.0 STABLE

2008-07-10 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Thursday, July 10, 2008 21:47:17 +0200 Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:31:51 +0200, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:50:25 +0200 Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:27:26 +0200, Paul Schmehl

Re: UMASS problem on 7.0 STABLE

2008-07-09 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:50:25 +0200 Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:27:26 +0200, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ever since I upgraded this workstation to 7.0 STABLE, I have been unable to reboot with my USB hard drive attached. During the boot

UMASS problem on 7.0 STABLE

2008-07-08 Thread Paul Schmehl
9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 on usb6 -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature withbuggy 6.3

2008-06-11 Thread Paul Schmehl
a rational, logical way to define the versioning so that it's not hieroglyphics to the average person. -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [nvidia | shared irq] umass disconnects [was: panic dd-ing from a USB disk ]

2008-06-09 Thread Paul Schmehl
]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 I just rebuilt world and kernel again, hoping the latest patches would solve the problem, but it didn't. -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ___ freebsd

Re: console access

2008-06-08 Thread Paul Schmehl
it works fine. So, I unplug the USB cable to reboot, then plug it back in and mount the drive after I login. Paul Schmehl If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer.

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-08 Thread Paul Schmehl
Interesting thoughts. Maybe the time is ripe for a RedHat-like support company for FreeBSD. Paul Schmehl If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer.

Re: 6.2; 6.3; EOL; combustible discussions

2008-06-08 Thread Paul Schmehl
works fulltime (IOW, is paid)? Would more fulltime workers alleviate the issues you've articulated? Paul Schmehl If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer.

Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-08 Thread Paul Schmehl
PITA. The box now runs FreeBSD again, and I doubt I will ever experiment with something else again. If I can't have FreeBSD, I won't run a server. I don't think I'm alone. Paul Schmehl If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer.

Re: console access

2008-06-07 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On June 7, 2008 2:16:26 PM -0700 Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 5, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: It's not quite that simple. To do that, I have to block out time to drive 45 miles during my supposed off hours and do the upgrade there. Because, if it breaks networking

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-07 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On June 7, 2008 2:41:32 PM +0800 Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/6/7 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Not only is this wrong, but it completely misses the point. Why should Jo have to upgrade to find out if his servers will fail under the conditions already articulated

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-06 Thread Paul Schmehl
*will* be able to afford redundancy. Paul Schmehl If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer.

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-06 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On June 6, 2008 3:08:25 PM +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] I reacted in anger because I felt the OP was being savagely attacked rather than being responded to with professionalism. Later in the thread some folks got around

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
to test and troubleshoot the bugs. What is the purpose of the insults and denigration? Do you really hope to accomplish something positive? -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
engage Jo in professional discussion. -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
not complaining now. I'm simply saying it would be more productive if folks *listened* to what people say about a particular problem and gave it some thought before firing salvos at the complainers and demanding that they contribute to solving the problem somehow. -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
to figure it out on my own. But testing? Not a chance? Contributing? I do what I can. I maintain a bunch of ports. I'm not a developer, and I can't read code and figure out what's going on except for the simplest of tasks. -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
ain't quite as easy to do as folks who are surrounded by hardware and test platforms assume it is. -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
** this is an all volunteer project where both time and money are at a premium. If I had a dollar for every time my wife complained about me using my valuable free time to support this site without any compensation, I could probably afford a test bed. :-) -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Friday, June 06, 2008 08:02:44 +1000 Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2008-Jun-05 10:33:18 -0500, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Thursday, June 05, 2008 18:39:07 +1000 Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2008-Jun-04 22:22:33 -0700, Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

2008-06-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Friday, June 06, 2008 00:19:05 +0200 Miroslav Lachman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: --On Thursday, June 05, 2008 19:10:19 +0200 Pieter de Goeje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a really easy way to test this. Build install a new kernel, but keep the old kernel around

Re: umass causes panic on 7 amd64

2008-04-17 Thread Paul Schmehl
the error message. If I log console would that do it? I doubt the console is logging at that point. I don't think syslogd is even running yet. -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security

Re: umass causes panic on 7 amd64

2008-04-17 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Thursday, April 17, 2008 18:06:28 +0300 Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 17/04/2008 17:56 Paul Schmehl said the following: I wish I had a core file to analyze. *Every* time I reboot my machine, I have to disconnect my usb drive. Then I have to remount it after I'm back up

Re: Usb problems on 7.0 RELEASE

2008-03-05 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Wednesday, March 05, 2008 18:09:16 +1100 Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:16:25PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: Earlier I reported usb problems on this list. Since then I have recompiled the kernel and world three times, each time including the latest

Usb problems on 7.0 RELEASE

2008-03-04 Thread Paul Schmehl
SCSI-4 device pass0: Serial Number 2CAH3H6P 40.000MB/s transfers Any hints on how to solve the umass booting problem are most welcome. I'll be happy to provide any additional information that will help locate the cause. Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE Available

2008-03-03 Thread Paul Schmehl
has the luxury of an internet connection when they're doing an install, so effort in this area is probably warranted. I just don't think that *any* solution will satisfy everyone (short of a DVD, which *may* be able to hold everything. -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE Available

2008-03-01 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Saturday, March 01, 2008 3:32 PM +0800 Nawfal bin Mohmad Rouyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can actually use csup instead of cvsup and it is already included in the base. I knew that, but old habits die hard. Plus I haven't read the csup man page yet. :-) Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE Available

2008-02-29 Thread Paul Schmehl
now, we should have some useful data to work with. Another approach might be to make one cd the desktop install cd, including all of the apps commonly used to install the desktop (xorg, kde, gnome, etc.) It does seem to me that some work in this area would pay dividends. Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL

Re: 7.0 RC3 and usb problems

2008-02-26 Thread Paul Schmehl
), Intel(0x), rev 1.00 port 1 powered port 2 powered Controller /dev/usb6: addr 1: high speed, self powered, config 1, EHCI root hub(0x), Intel(0x), rev 1.00 port 1 powered port 2 powered port 3 powered port 4 powered port 5 powered port 6 powered -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED

7.0 RC3 and linux linprocfs

2008-02-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
Is it no longer required to mount linprocfs in 7.0 RC3? I noticed that it wasn't added to /etc/rc.conf, and that linux.ko is loaded. Just wondering if the mount is still required or not? -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas

Re: 7.0 RC3 and linux linprocfs

2008-02-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Monday, February 25, 2008 23:34:59 +0100 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: Is it no longer required to mount linprocfs in 7.0 RC3? I noticed that it wasn't added to /etc/rc.conf, and that linux.ko is loaded. Just wondering if the mount is still required

Re: 7.0 RC3 and usb problems

2008-02-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 00:34:56 +0100 Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:01:53 +0100, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only major problem I'm having is usb just doesn't work right at all. The system doesn't sense when I insert a new device, and I

Re: 7.0 RC3 and usb problems

2008-02-25 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On February 25, 2008 9:47:23 PM -0800 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:59:27PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# kldload umass kldload: can't load umass: File exists [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 19

Flaky USB behavior on 7.0 RC3

2008-02-23 Thread Paul Schmehl
: vendor 0x8086 device 0x2930 Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) SMBus Controller pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x1002 device 0x94c1 ATI Technologies Inc Device unknown pci bus 0x0003 cardnum 0x02 function 0x00: vendor 0x11c1 device 0x5811 Agere Systems FW323 Paul Schmehl