I don't know why this was done, but now we are no longer able to place
firewall rule info as once possible in /etc/rc.conf.d/ipfw. I had
firewall_enable=YES
firewall_type=/etc/fw/rc.firewall.rules
firewall_quiet=YES
and now the last two variables no longer make it into /etc/rc.firewall.
I get the following:
=== ipmi (depend)
make: don't know how to make ipmi.c. Stop
*** Error code 2
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following error occurs building -stable on amd64:
make -sj2 buildworld make -sj2 buildkernel
...
=== bce (all)
/usr/src/sys/modules/bce/../../dev/bce/if_bce.c: In function
`bce_rx_intr':
/usr/src/sys/modules/bce/../../dev/bce/if_bce.c:4093: error: structure
has no member named `rxcycles'
I seem to think that this behaved differently, but perhaps not. Is this
appropriate behavior?...
triton# host ferrari
ferrari has address 10.1.0.50
ferrari has IPv6 address ::::xx0e:xbxx:xxca:77cf
ferrari has IPv6 address ::::xxc0:xfxx:xxa7:aea
If I do a ping6
I have a 2x Athlon running with amd64 kernel and I can hang 2 Linux
clients by attempting to write large amounts of data over TCP nfs. If I
set the nfsd to be UDP only, the problem never occurs.
Please let me know what I can do to help track this problem down.
Cheers,
Sean
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 11:24 -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
I have a 2x Athlon running with amd64 kernel and I can hang 2 Linux
clients by attempting to write large amounts of data over TCP nfs. If I
set the nfsd to be UDP only, the problem never occurs.
Please let me know what I can do to help
My sk0 is rendered useless when flooded with multicast join requests.
Here is my setup:
FreeBSD server.mcneil.com 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #94: Mon Nov 7
23:51:05 PST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMD64
amd64
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
This is very confusing:
I have a mount_autofs man page that is installed. I do not know when it
was placed in there, but it has a date of Nov 9, 2004
on /usr/share/man/man8/mount_autofs.8.gz.
The history, however, says The mount_autofs utility first appeared in
FreeBSD 6.0. which is not true.
Vinod,
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 19:01 -0800, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
Just like the problem is not seen when I build only the module, it's
not seen if I simply write a foo.c (with the example code) and compile it.
That's the reason I posted the patch to /sys/dev/twa/twa.c, which would
cause the
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 19:51 -0800, Vinod Kashyap wrote:
I did look at your posting Sean, thanks. But did you see the
undefined reference to `memset' linker error when you built it?
It's obvious that a reference to memset is being generated by
the initialization of an array of 100 bytes to 0.
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:34 +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely according to some of my
tests. With the re driver, no change except placing a 100BT setup with
no packet loss to a gigE setup (both linksys switches
Hi John-Mark,
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 13:31 -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Sean McNeil wrote this message on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:14 -0800:
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:34 +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 21:27 +0900, Shunsuke SHINOMIYA wrote:
Jeremie, thank you for your comment.
I did simple benchmark at some settings.
I used two boxes which are single Xeon 2.4GHz with on-boarded em.
I measured a TCP throughput by iperf.
These results show that the throughput
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 20:42 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
: Yes, I knew that adjusting TCP window size is important to use up a link.
: However I wanted to show adjusting the parameters of Interrupt
: Moderation affects network performance.
:
: And I think a packet loss was occured by enabled
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 23:57 +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Dear best guys,
I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates,
after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve
my performance problem (*laugh*):
(In short, see *** below)
I just cvsup'd my STABLE sources and recompiled. My new kernel now
panics on bootup. I couldn't get the info but I think it was a page
fault 12 or something like that. AMD processor. Anyone else
experiencing this? If not I will try to capture all the relevant info.
Sean
To Unsubscribe:
Hi,
I've noticed that I occasionally lose connections through my computer to
the internet. This has been happening because the dhcp client is trying
to change my ip to something bogus and resetting the ethernet:
May 30 23:44:17 blue dhclient: New Network Number: 66.75.176.0
May 30 23:44:17
17 matches
Mail list logo
