Re: How to handle the pack files now we have switched to git?

2021-01-06 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 11:08:48 +, Pete French wrote: So, for me the switch to git went very smoothly. I havent moved to etcupdate yet, but will probably do that soon. Hopwever I did hit one issue. What I do is to build on a single machine, and then send that to a number of places using

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD src repo transitioning to git this weekend

2021-01-04 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 19:02:24 +0100, Helge Oldach wrote: Hi all, I have deep cloned main from https://git.freebsd.org/src.git as described in the mini primer and started pulling updates. Now I'm stumbling over a bit of confusion: | hmo@p48 /usr/src $ git log -p

Re: No more update on stable/12

2021-01-01 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Obviously. I mean why would you get it from a third party instead from the project directly? On Fri, 1 Jan 2021, 21:19 Tj, wrote: > So the suggestion is still to use official freebsd.org url where possible? > > > Belatedly, this has now happened. Before the stable and master branches > on GH

Re: No more update on stable/12

2021-01-01 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 17:47:00 +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 17:44 Li-Wen Hsu wrote: On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 17:33 Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: From: Peter Blok Subject: No more update on stable/12 Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:24:27 +0100 > I switched to git, but I noticed

Re: git, $FreeBSD$ and mergemaster

2020-12-30 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Fri, 2020-12-25 at 04:18:22 -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 10:00:57PM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: Hi Kyle, On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 at 15:05, Kyle Evans wrote: ... > mergemaster only uses it as an optimization, if they're unexpanded > throughout then it falls back to

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD src repo transitioning to git this weekend

2020-12-23 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 12:19:47 -0800, John Kennedy wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:47:38PM -0800, John Kennedy wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 05:46:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > The FreeBSD project will be moving it's source repo from subversion to git > starting this this weekend. The

Re: -STABLE can no longer build -CURRENT kernel, linker missing ifunc

2018-07-26 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
2018-07-25 17:04 GMT+02:00 Kyle Evans : > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Alan Somers wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 14:35 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > >> > Hey all, as of a couple

-STABLE can no longer build -CURRENT kernel, linker missing ifunc

2018-07-25 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hey all, as of a couple of weeks ago, neither 11.2-RELEASE nor a recent 11-STABLE can buildkernel from head. This has stopped the Coverity Scan runs dead in its track and I wonder how anyone would boostrap a move from 11.x to 12.0 then. % env __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null make buildkernel make[1]:

Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out

2015-07-07 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
2015-07-01 13:38 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org: On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 04/21/15 12:34, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi all, Final pkg 1.5.0 has been

Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-09 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:14:18 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote: On 01/08/2013 23:33, Hiroki Sato wrote: Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote in 20130108184051.gi35...@acme.spoerlein.net: uq After setting this, it now looks like this: uq root@acme: ~# ip6addrctl uq Prefix

Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-09 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 23:42:10 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote in 20130109142111.gl35...@acme.spoerlein.net: On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:14:18 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote: On 01/08/2013 23:33, Hiroki Sato wrote: Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote

sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hey, I upgraded a server running 8.x to 9.1 over the weekend and sendmail no longer wants to bind the AF_INET6 sockets. So while this still works: DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MSA, M=Eu, InputMailFilters=dkim') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=::1, Name=MSA, Family=inet6,

Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 18:36:34 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote: On 01/08/2013 16:18, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Hey, I upgraded a server running 8.x to 9.1 over the weekend and sendmail no longer wants to bind the AF_INET6 sockets. So while this still works: DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp

Re: sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

2013-01-08 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:09:20 -0800, Gregory Shapiro wrote: How can I unstupid sendmail here? I don't think sendmail is being stupid here as it is doing what it has been doing under 8.x and 9.1 (the code is the same). I think something changed with the upgrade to 9.1. As far as

Re: Problem with zcat uncompressing man pages

2012-09-26 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 12:58:01 +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: Hi When I read 'certain' -- not all -- man pages zcat writes a small error to stderr when opening the man page; however, the man page does actually open. The message i get on the terminal is: zcat: error writing to

Re: stable/9 preferring IPv4 over IPv6, what changed?

2011-12-12 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 23:52:33 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2011-12-11 23:33, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: long story short: telnet foo on stable/8 will first try connecting via IPv6, then via IPv4 (foo has A and records). On stable/9 it's the other way round. This trips up my setup

stable/9 preferring IPv4 over IPv6, what changed?

2011-12-11 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hello long story short: telnet foo on stable/8 will first try connecting via IPv6, then via IPv4 (foo has A and records). On stable/9 it's the other way round. This trips up my setup, where a bunch of hosts (some behind NAT) can all talk to each other over their IPv6 addresses (some are

Re: Network throughput: Never get more than 112MB/s über two NICs

2011-04-12 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Mon, 11.04.2011 at 12:00:39 +0200, Denny Schierz wrote: hi, after testing severals loadbalancing (LACP) types with Cisco, we saw, that we never get more than 112MB/s with two network cards and iperf. So, we tested without loadbalancing, 4 Clients (iperf -f M -c ip) and two target IPs.

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-21 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 21:17:40 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Hello, Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the WITHOUT_GROFF flag. vgrind

RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hello, Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the WITHOUT_GROFF flag. vgrind(1) is only used for two papers under share/doc and we could easily

Re: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld)

2011-01-20 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Thu, 20.01.2011 at 15:31:03 -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure

tmpfs regression in recent -STABLE

2011-01-10 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hey, the following line in fstab used to work just fine for my /tmp: tmpfs /tmptmpfs rw,size=1g,mode=17770 0 But since I upgraded to 8.2-PRERELEASE, /tmp will soon run out of space (usually after leaving the box overnight). % df /tmp Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail

Re: tmpfs regression in recent -STABLE

2011-01-10 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Mon, 10.01.2011 at 16:49:14 -0500, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, January 10, 2011 4:40:04 pm Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Hey, the following line in fstab used to work just fine for my /tmp: tmpfs /tmptmpfs rw,size=1g,mode=17770 0 I thought

Are there digi(4) users running -STABLE? (was Re: Migrating ISA/PCI drivers)

2010-11-24 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
[cross-posting to stable@, where some of those folk might hang out] On Fri, 19.11.2010 at 09:21:00 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: I'm (belatedly) looking at porting digi(4) to the MPSAFE TTY system and have some architectural questions. The digi(4) driver appears to support 5 different Digi card

Re: Abysmal re(4) performance under 8.1-STABLE (mid-August)

2010-11-16 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Mon, 15.11.2010 at 18:03:25 -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote: On Mon, 08.11.2010 at 22:41:12 +0100, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote: On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 15:10:20 -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:24:21PM

Re: Abysmal re(4) performance under 8.1-STABLE (mid-August)

2010-11-14 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Mon, 08.11.2010 at 22:41:12 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 15:10:20 -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:24:21PM +0100, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote: On Sat, 06.11.2010 at 23:19:33 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ulrich Sp

Re: Abysmal re(4) performance under 8.1-STABLE (mid-August)

2010-11-08 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 15:10:20 -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:24:21PM +0100, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote: On Sat, 06.11.2010 at 23:19:33 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ulrich Sp??rlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote: Hello Pyun, On

Re: Abysmal re(4) performance under 8.1-STABLE (mid-August)

2010-11-07 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sat, 06.11.2010 at 23:19:33 -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote: Hello Pyun, On this new server, I cannot get more than ~280kByte/s up/downstream out of re(4) without any tweaking. re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING

Abysmal re(4) performance under 8.1-STABLE (mid-August)

2010-11-06 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hello Pyun, On this new server, I cannot get more than ~280kByte/s up/downstream out of re(4) without any tweaking. re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=389bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC

Re: Abysmal re(4) performance under 8.1-STABLE (mid-August)

2010-11-06 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sat, 06.11.2010 at 10:37:00 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Hello Pyun, On this new server, I cannot get more than ~280kByte/s up/downstream out of re(4) without any tweaking. re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=389bRXCSUM,TXCSUM

Re: bsnmpd returns incorrect hrProcessorLoad values

2010-06-02 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 03.02.2010 at 19:50:26 +0100, Gustau Pérez wrote: En/na Mikolaj Golub ha escrit: On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:37:52 +0100 Gustau Pérez wrote: Hi, I'm using cacti to monitor some servers running FBSD. I was using 7.2 with SCHED_4BSD. With this configuration :

Re: Any chance of someone commiting the patch in bin/131861 ?

2010-05-14 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Fri, 14.05.2010 at 10:17:23 +0100, Pete French wrote: Postfix will re-write this as part of sanitization, so I had to revert to creating mbox files by hand. Anyway, could you please test the following patch with a wider variety of mails? I've been testing your patch for a few weeks

Re: Any chance of someone commiting the patch in bin/131861 ?

2010-04-14 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 14.04.2010 at 14:45:55 +0100, Pete French wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/131861 I've been using the patch now for a couple of months with no observable problems. It is very small, and does fix a real annoyance with using /usr/bin/mail as your primary mail

Re: Any chance of someone commiting the patch in bin/131861 ?

2010-04-14 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
didn't work: Cc: a...@a.a,b...@b.b Postfix will re-write this as part of sanitization, so I had to revert to creating mbox files by hand. Anyway, could you please test the following patch with a wider variety of mails? commit 59a3e2a82bdeafb7bb46e8d5c39dcb2474d7f826 Author: Ulrich Spörlein u

numeric sort(1) is broken on -STABLE

2010-02-10 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hi guys, not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me that gnu sort -n is broken on at least -STABLE (couldn't test -CURRENT yet). It somehow does not manifest when using a simple list and sorting on a specific column, but it always happens to me when using it in combination with

Re: freebsd7 (and 8), radeon, xorg-server - deadlock or so

2010-02-10 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 09:11:10 -0600, Robert Noland wrote: I have a strong suspicion that the issue is with bus_dma. If this is a pci based card, then it is trying to allocate 32MB of contiguous physical ram when the drm device is opened. This usually succeeds the first time that the driver

Re: numeric sort(1) is broken on -STABLE

2010-02-10 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 13:49:05 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Hi guys, not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me that gnu sort -n is broken on at least -STABLE (couldn't test -CURRENT yet). It somehow does

Re: numeric sort(1) is broken on -STABLE

2010-02-10 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 15:00:07 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Feb 10), Ulrich Spörlein said: On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 13:49:05 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: not sure if this is a pilot error, but it seems to me

Re: freebsd7 (and 8), radeon, xorg-server - deadlock or so

2010-02-10 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 12:08:12 -0600, Robert Noland wrote: On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 19:00 +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Wed, 10.02.2010 at 09:11:10 -0600, Robert Noland wrote: I have a strong suspicion that the issue is with bus_dma. If this is a pci based card, then it is trying

Re: Multiple serial consoles via null modem cable

2010-01-21 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Thu, 21.01.2010 at 11:37:06 +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote: Here's what I did: box1 COM1/ttyd0 - box2 COM1/ttyd0 - using null modem cable box1 COM2/ttyd1 - box3 COM1/ttyd0 - using null modem cable On box1 I have this in /etc/ttys: ttyd0 /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 vt100 on secure

Re: gstat: geom_gettree = -1: No such file or directory

2010-01-02 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Fri, 01.01.2010 at 18:47:27 +0100, martinko wrote: Hi list, gstat(8) does not work here on 8.0 (it worked happily on 6.x and 7.x) : # gstat gstat: geom_gettree = -1: No such file or directory Is this known ? What can I do ? I doubt that it is widely known, but I've seen these 2-3

Re: UTF-8 problem in 8.0

2010-01-02 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Fri, 01.01.2010 at 15:47:36 -0800, Derek Kulinski wrote: Hello, After installing FreeBSD 8.0 I noticed that some characters aren't displayed correctly (it worked fine for 7.2). Mainly the dash character is most noticeable (though it's possible it's more of them). Example: env

Re: problem with link aggregation failover

2009-09-27 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sat, 12.09.2009 at 22:34:41 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: Hello, I am trying to configure lagg failover mode on 7.2. I do: # ifconfig xl0 up # ifconfig fxp0 up # ifconfig lagg0 create # ifconfig lagg0 up laggproto failover laggport xl0 laggport fxp0 # dhclient lagg0 And

Re: problem with link aggregation failover

2009-09-27 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sun, 27.09.2009 at 09:49:03 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Sat, 12.09.2009 at 22:34:41 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote: Hello, I am trying to configure lagg failover mode on 7.2. I do: # ifconfig xl0 up # ifconfig fxp0 up

Re: mergemaster merge left/right

2009-07-13 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
using X, maximize your xterm horizontally and use mergemaster -w100 or something like that. It will probe the tty again and offer the real width, so I usually just run mergemaster -w1 and hit enter. hth, Ulrich Spörlein ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: pw groupadd/useradd fail when the nscd cache is used for name/group resolution

2009-07-13 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
/postgresql84-server]# -- and here -- Shouldn't 'files' be used upon a cache miss? If this is a PEBKAC, sorry for the noise. Just a me too. This is most likely because nscd is also caching negative lookups. The usual workaround would be to restart it using /etc/rc.d/nscd restart Cheers, Ulrich Spörlein

Re: ZFS weird device tasting loop since MFC

2009-06-05 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Tue, 02.06.2009 at 11:24:08 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Tue, 02.06.2009 at 11:16:10 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Hi all, so I went ahead and updated my ~7.2 file server to the new ZFS goodness, and before running any further tests, I already discovered something weird

Re: ZFS weird device tasting loop since MFC

2009-06-02 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Tue, 02.06.2009 at 11:16:10 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Hi all, so I went ahead and updated my ~7.2 file server to the new ZFS goodness, and before running any further tests, I already discovered something weird and annoying. I'm using a mirror on GELI, where one disk is usually

ZFS weird device tasting loop since MFC

2009-06-02 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
| ad4 There is no activity going on, especially md0 is for /tmp, yet it constantly tries to read stuff from everywhere. I will now insert the second drive and see if ZFS shuts up then ... Cheers, Ulrich Spörlein -- http://www.dubistterrorist.de

Re: ZFS on top of GELI / Intel Atom 330 system

2009-05-31 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
is a must for this setup, so you can use 2 GELI threads and have the ZFS threads on top of that to spread the load. Cheers, Ulrich Spörlein -- http://www.dubistterrorist.de/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: ZFS on top of GELI / Intel Atom 330 system

2009-05-31 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
put somewhere else. Cheers, Ulrich Spörlein -- http://www.dubistterrorist.de/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: ZFS on top of GELI / Intel Atom 330 system

2009-05-31 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
. Cheers, Ulrich Spörlein -- http://www.dubistterrorist.de/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: gemor mirror and priority

2009-03-22 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
. (This probably wouldn't happen anyway, but it would be nice to be sure...) This will not happen. Besides, I would strongly encourage you to disable automatic rebuilding for this type of setup. Cheers, Ulrich Spörlein -- None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free

Re: /dev/cuau* ports hang after a while

2009-01-29 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
with mentioned side effects. Is this identical hardware? Cheers, Ulrich Spörlein -- None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http

Snapshot duration, performance and how to avoid I/O lock

2006-09-06 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hi, I have to create regular snapshots of several volumes roughly 1.4TB in size (each). But using mksnap_ffs takes a lot of time (45 minutes) and it looks like it could be speed up. iostat reports some 2MB/s of I/O tty da0 da1 sa0 cpu