Hi,
I managed myself in a somewhat weird situation on a new Epyc server.
It has 2x 4T spinning HDD and 2x intel SSD.
This is what I did:
- Installed 12.1-RELASE from a USB stick
- Put the zroot on the 2 HHDs in mirror
- Downloaded 12/stable, compiled and installed that.
- Then I added cach
On 05/12/2018 00:48, Toomas Soome wrote:
Yes, that must be true but it does not hurt to get checked.
And of course, lsdev -v from 11.x loader would be good too.
Anyhow, I am afraid we have reached to point where more specific debug info is
needed (printed out), with lack of output about disks
he things I looked for, bad things in log files.
But the server does not deem to have any hardware problems.
I'll dive a bit deeper into my ZIL SSDs
Thanx,
--WjW
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
> On 06/11/2018 01:29 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 11-6-2018 12:53, Andriy
On 11-6-2018 12:53, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 11/06/2018 13:26, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 11/06/2018 12:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2018 13:02, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>> My file server is crashing about every 15 minutes at the moment.
>>&g
On 11/06/2018 12:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 08/06/2018 13:02, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
My file server is crashing about every 15 minutes at the moment.
The panic looks like:
Jun 8 11:48:43 zfs kernel: panic: Solaris(panic): zfs: allocating
allocated segment(offset=1291670400 size=24576
Hi,
My file server is crashing about every 15 minutes at the moment.
The panic looks like:
Jun 8 11:48:43 zfs kernel: panic: Solaris(panic): zfs: allocating
allocated segment(offset=1291670400 size=24576)
Jun 8 11:48:43 zfs kernel:
Jun 8 11:48:43 zfs kernel: cpuid = 1
Jun 8 11:48:43 zfs k
Hi,
Yesterday evening I upgraded a system to 11.1-RELEASE-p10.
But that sort of upset my GSM-dongle I use for alarming.
And it did not do that before the upgrade, where I was running -p9.
This is what I find repeated at rather high frequency in the logs:
+ugen1.3: at usbus1
+u3g0 on uhub3
+u3g
On 29-4-2018 18:53, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 28/4/18 8:46 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded a server from 10.4 to 11.1 and now al of a sudden the
server complains about:
ZFS: Can't find pool by guid
And I end up in the boot prompt:
lsdev gives disk0 withe on p1 the pa
Hi,
I upgraded a server from 10.4 to 11.1 and now al of a sudden the server
complains about:
ZFS: Can't find pool by guid
And I end up in the boot prompt:
lsdev gives disk0 withe on p1 the partion that the zroot is/was.
This is an active server, so redoing install and stuf is nog goin
On 21/01/2018 21:24, Don Lewis wrote:
On 21 Jan, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 19/01/2018 23:29, Don Lewis wrote:
On 19 Jan, Pete French wrote:
Out of interest, is there anyone out there running Ryzen who *hasnt*
seen lockups ? I'd be curious if there a lot of lurkers thinking "
On 19/01/2018 23:29, Don Lewis wrote:
On 19 Jan, Pete French wrote:
Out of interest, is there anyone out there running Ryzen who *hasnt*
seen lockups ? I'd be curious if there a lot of lurkers thinking "mine
works fine"
No hangs or silent reboots here with either my original CPU or warranty
re
On 25-7-2016 21:53, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On 7/25/2016 14:48, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 25-7-2016 19:32, Karl Denninger wrote:
>>> On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
>>>> wrote:
>&
On 25-7-2016 19:32, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On 7/25/2016 12:04, Ronald Klop wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:48:25 +0200, Karl Denninger
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This may not belong in "stable", but since Postfix is one of the
>>> high-performance alternatives to sendmail
>>>
>>> Question is this -- I
Hi,
My fileserver dies again lastnight on a Areca bus timeout
En this is what I found in one of the clients logs:
+newnfs server zfs:/home: nonte wrnefssp osnedrivnegr
+ <6>zfs:/home: not responding
+newnfs server zfs:/home: not responding
+newnfs server zfs:/home: not responding
+newnfs se
On 24-8-2015 16:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 24-8-2015 16:01, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
On 24-8-2015 16:01, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the previous version before Bapt upgraded pw(8) I was allowed to do
>> pw useradd -V /etc
>>
>> Even though the manual p
Hi,
In the previous version before Bapt upgraded pw(8) I was allowed to do
pw useradd -V /etc
Even though the manual page instructed otherwise.
The new version sticks to the manual page and generates:
pw: illegal option -- V
I'm going to change the scripts, but perhaps others will be bi
===> procfs (cleandir)
rm -f export_syms procfs.ko procfs.kld procfs_ctl.o procfs_dbregs.o
procfs_fpregs.o procfs_ioctl.o procfs_map.o procfs_mem.o procfs_note.o
procfs_osrel.o procfs_regs.o procfs_rlimit.o procfs_status.o
procfs_type.o procfs.o procfs.ko.debug procfs.ko.symbols opt_compat.h
vnode_
On 14-8-2015 07:58, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
I've just upgraded three machines from 10.1 to 10.2. Congratulations
on the release...
This was one of the worst upgrade experiences in my FreeBSD history,
going back to 4.0 days. I used freebsd-update but I was absolutely
swamped with merging the sv
On 29-7-2015 18:01, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:32 AM, Willem Jan Withagen
wrote:
You have any idea what is/was actual the hardware that was in the
box?
If I remember correctly we gave Jordan a check for like 5000
guilders. Which I guess would be 2500 us$ at that time. Which
On 27/07/2015 16:42, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:32:34PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 27/07/2015 16:25, Glen Barber wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>> On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Ka
On 27/07/2015 16:25, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>> * Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from
>>> the machine that has been han
On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> * Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from
> the machine that has been handling this task for over 18 years, to
> new, single-purpose service installations
Hi,
This sort of sounds like the system that a former company
On 22/06/2015 16:10, Daniel Genis wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> we're currently running 10.1-RELEASE, but are encountering the l2arc
> memory leak which got resolved in 10.1-STABLE r274172, maybe we need
> r275609 also (as discussed here:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197164).
Op 23 jun. 2013 om 03:15 heeft Jeremy Chadwick het volgende
geschreven:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 02:41:27AM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 19-6-2013 17:04, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> - Adam runs 9.1-RELEASE because of business needs pertaining to
>>>
On 19-6-2013 17:04, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
- Adam runs 9.1-RELEASE because of business needs pertaining to
freebsd-update and binary updates. (I ask more about this for
benefits of readers below, however -- because this situation comes
up a lot and I want to know what real-world admins
On 19-6-2013 15:41, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Ronald Klop"
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:53:19 +0200, Adam Strohl
wrote:
On 6/19/2013 19:21, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:35:57PM +0700, Adam Strohl wrote:
Hello -STABLE@,
So I've seen this si
On 10-6-2013 21:57, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On Jun 10, 2013, at 20:39, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Op 10 jun. 2013 om 19:27 heeft Dimitry Andric het volgende
geschreven:
On Jun 10, 2013, at 14:04, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'm trying to build a stable kernle on a freshly build 8.4-S
Op 10 jun. 2013 om 19:27 heeft Dimitry Andric het volgende
geschreven:
> On Jun 10, 2013, at 14:04, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> I'm trying to build a stable kernle on a freshly build 8.4-Stable i386
>> system.
>>
>> And I get:
>> MAKE=make sh /usr/src
On 2013-06-10 14:19, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
> Le 10/06/2013 14:14, Jeremy Chadwick a écrit :
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:04:59PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>> I'm trying to build a stable kernle on a freshly build 8.4-Stable i386
>>> system.
>>
On 2013-06-10 14:14, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:04:59PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> I'm trying to build a stable kernle on a freshly build 8.4-Stable i386
>> system.
>>
>> And I get:
>> MAKE=make sh /usr/srcs/src9/src/sys/con
Hi,
I'm trying to build a stable kernle on a freshly build 8.4-Stable i386
system.
And I get:
MAKE=make sh /usr/srcs/src9/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh GENERIC
/usr/local/bin/svnversion
cc -c -O -pipe -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpoin
On 17-1-2013 4:18, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 23:27 +0200, Sami Halabi wrote:
>> Thank you for your response, very helpful.
>> one question - how do i configure auto-reboot once kernel panic occurs?
>>
>> Sami
>>
>
> From src/sys/conf/NOTES, this may be what you're looking for...
>
On 2013-01-17 15:26, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Willem Jan Withagen"
> To: "Julian Stecklina"
> Cc: "Steven Hartland" ; "Andriy Gapon"
> ;
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:11 PM
> Subject: Re:
On 2013-01-17 3:08, Julian Stecklina wrote:
>
>
> Steven Hartland wrote:
>
>> - Original Message - From: "Andriy Gapon"
>>
>>
>>
>>> on 11/01/2013 21:38 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>>> On 2013-01-07 1
Op 17 jan. 2013 om 01:17 heeft "Steven Hartland" het
volgende geschreven:
> - Original Message - From: "Andriy Gapon"
>
>
>> on 11/01/2013 21:38 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> On 2013-01-07 18:06, Julian Stecklina wrote:
>
On 2013-01-07 18:06, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> Thus spake Andriy Gapon :
>
>> on 29/11/2012 17:16 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> Would that mean that the regular checkout of stable/9 contains enough
>>> code to allow "painless" rebootin
Hi,
Not sure on what other list this would be discussed...
But I noticed that:
Error 503 torrents.FreeBSD.org is offline. It will probably will not be
back.
And this has been one of the small ways to support the FreeBSD
community, by offering almost all images on torrents
Got about
On 2012-12-18 1:01, Jim Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Willem Jan Withagen <mailto:w...@digiware.nl>> wrote:
>
> Right,
>
> That did the trick.
> Thanx for the code.
>
> --WjW
>
>
>
> Patch co
On 17-12-2012 23:43, Jim Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
>> On 17-12-2012 23:10, Jim Harris wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Willem Jan Withagen >> <mailto:w...@digiware.nl>> wr
On 17-12-2012 23:10, Jim Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Willem Jan Withagen <mailto:w...@digiware.nl>> wrote:
>
> On 17-12-2012 20:16, Jim Harris wrote:>
> > The timeouts are occurring on inquiry commands to non-zero LUN
On 17-12-2012 20:16, Jim Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Willem Jan Withagen <mailto:w...@digiware.nl>> wrote:
>
> On 2012-12-17 15:38, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > Check the smart results of each disk in the array you may hav
On 2012-12-17 15:38, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Check the smart results of each disk in the array you may have a failing
> disk.
> - Original Message - From: "Willem Jan Withagen"
> To: "FreeBSD Stable Users"
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 10:
Hi,
I have not noticed this before, but my system rebooted this morning and
in the following security report I found a lot of messgaes in the
dmesg-part like:
+(probe0:arcmsr0:0:16:1): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 20 0 0 24 0
+(probe0:arcmsr0:0:16:1): CAM status: Command timeout
+(probe0:arcmsr0:0:16:1): Ret
On 2012-11-29 16:08, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/11/2012 10:53 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> On 2012-11-29 9:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>>> Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200,
>>> Andriy Gapon a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
On 2012-11-29 9:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200,
> Andriy Gapon a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
>> on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
>>> As far I can see it fails because there is no getnewvnode_reserve()
>>> / get_newvnode_drop_reserve() in 9.1
On 25-11-2012 0:43, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I'm surprised it's not tunable via a kenv variable at boottime..
That would help,
especially if we can get it in the beastie bootmenu options...
--WjW
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
On 23-11-2012 1:20, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:14:59PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 22 November 2012 06:30, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Neither ICH,
On 23-11-2012 23:25, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/11/2012 00:09 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
With you latest patch I was able to:
reboot
shutdown -r now
shutdown -p now
So that seems to work just oke.
Good news. Thank you for working on this!
I'm waiting fo
On 23-11-2012 15:31, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/11/2012 15:09 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
Le Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:41:54 +0200,
Andriy Gapon a écrit :
Hello,
I will definitely MFC it to stable/9, just not sure if I would be
able to do it before New Year. It definitely won't be in 9.
On 2012-11-23 17:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/11/2012 18:12 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> I have applied the patch but at the moment it does not fix anything
>> If I go reboot, it still hangs.
>>
>> CTL-ALT-DEL give the last burp from the console bu
On 2012-11-23 15:31, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/11/2012 15:09 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following:
>> Le Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:41:54 +0200,
>> Andriy Gapon a écrit :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
I will definitely MFC it to stable/9, just not sure if I would be
able to do it before New Year. It defi
On 2012-11-21 21:08, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. because some of us like kernel behaviour to be predictable and
> controllable, rather than 'just be dynamic here, what could possibly
> go wrong.'
>
> Just bump the default kernel buffer size up to 64k and leave it
> hard-coded like that. Us embedded p
On 2012-11-21 19:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 20:08 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> On 2012-11-21 19:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> on 21/11/2012 19:48 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
> [snip]
>>>> It seems to to be waiting/working in the
On 2012-11-21 19:05, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 19:48 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> On 2012-11-21 18:27, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>> On 2012-11-21 18:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>> on 21/11/2012 19:09 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>&g
On 2012-11-21 18:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 19:09 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 21/11/2012 19:06 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>>> Nothing that stands out for me, but then I'm not into FreeBSD kernels.
>>> But there is certainly no
On 2012-11-21 18:09, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:08:12 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 21/11/2012 18:01 Ian Lepore said the following:
> > > You know what would be great? Have this value auto-tune itself upwards
> > > if bootverbose is true.
> >
> > This sounds /potentially/
On 2012-11-21 16:10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 11:55 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> Hoi,
>>
>> I'm building some new hardware for a customer, and given that 9.1 is
>> about to be around the corner, I installed 9.1-stable.
>>
>> svn
On 2012-11-21 16:08, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 15:20 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> On 2012-11-21 11:14, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>> On 2012-Nov-21 10:57:49 +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>> Probably because the kernelbuffer for it is too small
On 2012-11-21 16:10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/11/2012 11:55 Willem Jan Withagen said the following:
>> Hoi,
>>
>> I'm building some new hardware for a customer, and given that 9.1 is
>> about to be around the corner, I installed 9.1-stable.
>>
>> svn
On 2012-11-21 11:14, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Nov-21 10:57:49 +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> Probably because the kernelbuffer for it is too small.
>> I know there used to be a kernel option to increase it.
>> But I can not find it with the setting in NOTES
Hoi,
I'm building some new hardware for a customer, and given that 9.1 is
about to be around the corner, I installed 9.1-stable.
svn from last night
Trouble is that a reboot takes for ever...
Same with shutdown -r now...
What happens is:
services get killed
we end with all b
Hi,
As a next question to my building this server.
I'm nogt able to get a full verbose dmesg.
Probably because the kernelbuffer for it is too small.
I know there used to be a kernel option to increase it.
But I can not find it with the setting in NOTES or any other place I
looked
Is it stil
On 2012-09-06 11:29, Борис Самородов wrote:
[stuff about problems with loading linux.ko deleted ]
>> So how do I get freebsd32_exec_copyin_args defined
>>
>> Any insights appreciated,
>
> Is it FreeBSD-amd64? (uname -a is a good start)
> If yes, have you got i386 compatibility? (kernel con
Hi,
I'm trying to get htop to work, but that requires linproc.
So building and loading linproc I get:
l# kldload linprocfs
kldload: can't load linprocfs: Exec format error
So I go Grrrmbbblll, try som more things, rebuild kernel and modules...
Only to find out this morning in the reports that /v
On 2012-03-03 17:37, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 02:40:09PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> I'm running into this on a backup-backupserver.
>> (8.2-STABLE #134: Wed Feb 1 15:05:59 CET 2012 amd64)
>
>> Haven't checked which paths are t
On 2012-02-01 14:40, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have this ZFS server up for about 27 days, and about 3 weeks ago (was
> not really paying attention) it turns out it lost its SSD that I'm using
> for log and cache. There is also a poor and lonely memory stick for l
On my ZFS server:
(info on: http://www.tegenbosch28.nl/FreeBSD/systems/ZFS/ )
+ahcich4: Timeout on slot 23 port 0
+ahcich4: is cs 0080 ss rs 0080 tfd c0 serr
cmd 0004d717
+(ada3:ahcich4:0:0:0): lost device
+(ada3:ahcich4:0:0:0): removing device entry
+ada3 at ah
On 2012-02-27 8:40, Peter Maloney wrote:
> And one word of advice: If you want to upgrade your pools to v28, I
> think you should consider recreating your pools as v28 rather than
> upgrading. There are some side effects to upgrading, such as logs that
> can't be removed.
Hi Peter,
Although your
Hi,
I'm running into this on a backup-backupserver.
(8.2-STABLE #134: Wed Feb 1 15:05:59 CET 2012 amd64)
Haven't checked which paths are too long.
But is there any "easy" way out? Like making MAXPATHLEN 2048 and
rebuilding locate.
Or is that going to propagate and major impact all and everything
On 13-2-2012 17:28, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:15:42PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 2012-02-01 19:09, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>> On 2012-02-01 17:35, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> The SATA PHY counters for the disk, kept in GP log area 0x11,
On 2012-02-01 19:09, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 2012-02-01 17:35, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Took a little longer, since "holidays got in the way".
But even in the original server connected to regular intel sataports,
the device is not known and 2 commands failed.
On 2012-02-01 17:35, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 04:56:23PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 2012-02-01 15:39, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:40:17PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>> The device is a Corsair 60G
On 2012-02-01 15:39, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:40:17PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> The device is a Corsair 60Gb Force GT. And thusfar I have not found any
>> suggestions that that serie of devices is prone to doing this.
>
> Can you please
Hi,
I have this ZFS server up for about 27 days, and about 3 weeks ago (was
not really paying attention) it turns out it lost its SSD that I'm using
for log and cache. There is also a poor and lonely memory stick for log.
So the box did not really suffer file loss.
system is running:
FreeBSD zfs.
On 2011-11-17 12:20, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:03:26PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 2011-11-16 18:22, Peter Maloney wrote:
Willem,
I can only guess, but...
Is AHCI enabled in the bios? If you are not using 'fake-raid' for any
disks, you should [de
re you using an expander?
No SATA expanders...
What HBA / hard disk controller are you using?
A combi of CH9 and ARECA in PCI-X, disks are all exported a single disks.
Thanx for the suggestions
-_WjW
Am 16.11.2011 17:12, schrieb Willem Jan Withagen:
Hi,
I'm getting these:
Nov 16
On 2011-11-16 20:55, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
On 16.11.2011 18:12, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'm getting these:
Nov 16 16:40:49 zfs kernel: ata6: port is not ready (timeout 15000ms)
tfd = 0080
Nov 16 16:40:49 zfs kernel: ata6: hardware reset timeout
Nov 16 16:41:50 zfs kernel:
Hi,
I'm getting these:
Nov 16 16:40:49 zfs kernel: ata6: port is not ready (timeout 15000ms)
tfd = 0080
Nov 16 16:40:49 zfs kernel: ata6: hardware reset timeout
Nov 16 16:41:50 zfs kernel: ata6: port is not ready (timeout 15000ms)
tfd = 0080
Nov 16 16:41:50 zfs kernel: ata6: hardware
On 2011-11-10 23:25, Joshua Boyd wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Willem Jan Withagen mailto:w...@digiware.nl>> wrote:
em0@pci0:0:25:0:class=0x02 card=0x10bd15d9
chip=0x10bd8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
dev
On 10-11-2011 23:25, Joshua Boyd wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Willem Jan Withagen mailto:w...@digiware.nl>> wrote:
em0@pci0:0:25:0:class=0x02 card=0x10bd15d9
chip=0x10bd8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
dev
On 10-11-2011 10:50, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:22:39AM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Still running this file server on ZFS, and every now and then em0
goes down, and is not revivable Nothing goes in or out the
box...
Any suggestions as how to (help) fix this
Hi
Still running this file server on ZFS, and every now and then em0 goes
down, and is not revivable Nothing goes in or out the box...
Any suggestions as how to (help) fix this?
Regards,
--WjW
---
Nov 10 09:07:41 zfs kernel: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
Nov 10 09:07:41 zfs ker
On 23-10-2011 17:09, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>> but there was no forwarding table and all packets were forwarded
>> to all ports.
>
> I always figured that's normal for a "hub" as opposed to a "switch".
>
>> I also remember that SOME hubs of that era had series problems if
>> the cable was
On 22-8-2011 1:15, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 2011-08-22 1:01, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 04:01:10PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm assembling a few system with a ASUS P8 H161-MLE motherboard
>>>
On 2011-08-22 1:01, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 04:01:10PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I'm assembling a few system with a ASUS P8 H161-MLE motherboard
which was supposed to have a 'Realtek® 8112L, 1 x Gigabit LAN
Controller(s)' onboard.
And to be h
Hi,
I'm assembling a few system with a ASUS P8 H161-MLE motherboard
which was supposed to have a 'Realtek® 8112L, 1 x Gigabit LAN
Controller(s)' onboard.
And to be honestly I never expected that version not to be supported.
Just booted 8.2-RELEASE on it, and the Installer crashed when I wanted
On 20-8-2011 13:26, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 2011-08-20 13:15, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
Today I liked to live dangerously, and want to upgrade a backups server
from i386 to amd64. Just to see if we could.
And otherwise I'd scap it and install from usb-stick.
So I have my s
On 2011-08-20 13:15, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
Today I liked to live dangerously, and want to upgrade a backups server
from i386 to amd64. Just to see if we could.
And otherwise I'd scap it and install from usb-stick.
So I have my server running amd64 build GENERIC.
export /, /var,
Hi,
Today I liked to live dangerously, and want to upgrade a backups server
from i386 to amd64. Just to see if we could.
And otherwise I'd scap it and install from usb-stick.
So I have my server running amd64 build GENERIC.
export /, /var, /usr on the server to be upgraded.
But upgrading worl
On 2011-08-02 1:00, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:27:57AM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
A server just all of a sudden dropped from the network.
uptime was 26days.
This got my ZFS server hanging:
Aug 1 23:39:58 zfs kernel: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
Aug 1 23
On 2011-08-02 0:49, Claus Guttesen wrote:
Do you happen to run nfs on the server?
I had weird problems with igb-timeouts when many nfs-reads occured
and a down and up on the interface would restore the network
connection for a while. I had vmware-servers on a nfs-share and
either when booting or
A server just all of a sudden dropped from the network.
uptime was 26days.
This got my ZFS server hanging:
Aug 1 23:39:58 zfs kernel: em0: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
Aug 1 23:39:58 zfs kernel: em0: Queue(0) tdh = 942, hw tdt = 977
Aug 1 23:39:58 zfs kernel: em0: TX(0) desc avail = 985,Next
On 2011-06-27 4:49, 黃清隆 wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your bug report.
Please compile the new driver in attached zip file and try again.
Thanks,
Ching
Hi Ching,
So I did, and it did boot the server.
However upon reboot it again paniced.
This time in arcmsc.c: 1298 with:
mtx_lock_sleep r
On 2011-06-27 15:39, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Hi Ching,
Thanks very much for the quick turn around! The person who was having
the error is actually Willem, not me. All has been running fine for my
setup, but I will deploy it as well to test.
Yup,
And I've got my plate full with real-live j
On 26-6-2011 15:52, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 6/25/2011 7:53 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running ZFS of of 8 disks on an areca 1120
>> Things were just running fine until I tried upgrading to the most recent
>> STABLE.
>>
>>
On 26-6-2011 15:02, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 02:19:30PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 26-6-2011 13:50, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>> - Original Message ----- From: "Willem Jan Withagen"
>>>
>>>> Well the main
On 26-6-2011 13:50, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Willem Jan Withagen"
>
>> Well the main key to the problem is that on 2011/06/06 the new version
>> from Areca got imported. So if you have all your boxes with kernels
>> predating
On 26-6-2011 13:16, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Willem Jan Withagen"
> ...
>> So I tried opgrading my firmware to 1.49, but to no avail.
>> The system keeps panicing.
>>
>> So I guess that there is still a coding error some
On 26-6-2011 13:01, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 01:53:17AM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> I'm running ZFS of of 8 disks on an areca 1120
>> Things were just running fine until I tried upgrading to the most recent
>> STABLE.
>>
&g
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
