Re: ZFS ghost files on 11.3-STABLE

2019-11-25 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Mon 2019-11-25 (18:35), Miroslav Lachman wrote: > It is possible you have some non printable (invisible) character in the > filename. It can be trailing space, newline or something else so in fact Wow I'm an idiot, thought I'd spotted a bug, yes there was a trailing space, many thanks.

ZFS ghost files on 11.3-STABLE

2019-11-25 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I deleted a file (rm filter) by mistake instead of its backup 'filter~', however it seems a remnant of a much older version of the file (given by its date and content) is half hanging around? $ ls -l filter ls: filter: No such file or directory $ ls -l filter* -rw-r--r-- 1 lordcow

Re: screen crashes on 11.3-STABLE

2019-10-28 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Mon 2019-10-28 (14:24), Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > My analysis: screen dumps core on terminals with TERM=xterm* or > TERM=rxvt* if they don't advertise Km ("key_mouse") capability Ah great, many thanks and for the commit, and yes I had my TERM set differently on the host.

screen crashes on 11.3-STABLE

2019-10-28 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I upgraded from 11-STABLE r344000 to r353939 and now screen (sysutils/screen) crashes inside both my jails: $ screen [screen caught signal 11. (core dumped)] (there's no core dump). kernel log: pid 56569 (screen), jid 2, uid 1001: exited on signal 6 This happens as a user or

Re: 10.1-STABLE bce: Watchdog timeout occurred

2015-04-21 Thread Gareth Wyn Roberts
a long shot, but you could try increasing BCE_DMA_ALIGN and/or BCE_RX_BUF_ALIGN in the include file if_bcereg.h, say up to 4096, to see whether it makes any difference. - Gareth. On 21/04/2015 10:52, Alnis Morics wrote: On 04/21/2015 06:17 AM, Chris Ross wrote: I got a new [to me] system

RE: msk msk0 watchdog timeout freeze hang lock stop problem

2015-04-15 Thread Gareth Wyn Roberts
-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] on behalf of Yonghyeon PYUN [pyu...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 April 2015 09:13 To: Gareth Wyn Roberts Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: msk msk0 watchdog timeout freeze hang lock stop problem On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 05:57:34PM +, Gareth Wyn Roberts wrote: I've

msk msk0 watchdog timeout freeze hang lock stop problem

2015-04-12 Thread Gareth Wyn Roberts
The patches to both files which also implement a MSK_64BIT_DMA_DISABLE flag are attached. Perhaps the developers would consider committing these as it may be useful for future debugging. Gareth. --- if_mskreg.h-orig 2014-11-11 20:02:58.0 + +++ if_mskreg.h 2015-04-12 18:47

Re: schg flags from installworld

2012-09-19 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2012-09-18 (23:31), Gareth de Vaux wrote: Looking at /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk and /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk - bins and libs get installed with schg if PRECIOUSPROG and PRECIOUSLIB are set respectively in their makefiles, both of which can be overridden by setting NO_FSCHG

Re: unrecognised external drive

2012-08-16 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Wed 2012-08-15 (08:58), Erich Dollansky wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:34:37 +0200 idVendor 0x1058 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. idProduct 0x1042 could it be that the kernel does not know this product? You can check the sources (usbdevs should be the name

unrecognised external drive

2012-08-14 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I bought a Western Digital external drive a few months ago but it gets kicked out 20 seconds after I plug it in. I've updated to the latest 8.3-STABLE: $ uname -a FreeBSD file 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Sun Aug 12 12:45:04 SAST 2012 root@file:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COWNEL amd64

Re: gmirror not synced

2012-01-07 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2012-01-05 (09:56), Matthew Seaman wrote: drive is actually generating errors.) Also try a few passes of memtest86 to try and spot problems with RAM. Yes that was the problem, have gotten rid of a faulty DIMM and everything is looking a lot saner, thanx :

gmirror not synced

2012-01-04 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I've noticed that the md5 hashes of a couple of files on a gmirror change when I recalculate the hashes. The output usually cycles between 2 hashes per file. I'm guessing this is because each calculation reads the file randomly from 1 of 2 component drives, and the files in question had a

Re: ZFS raidz recovery

2010-12-21 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Mon 2010-12-06 (13:07), Gareth de Vaux wrote: 'zpool replace' also only works if you physically swap out a disk at the same port, or replace disk1 with disk2 online. 'zpool remove' and 'zpool detach' don't remove devices from a raidz. So I can recover an array if I have an extra disk

Re: ZFS raidz recovery

2010-12-06 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Sat 2010-11-27 (15:22), Gareth de Vaux wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a disk fail and replacement in a raidz array and failing myself. What'm I doing wrong? Here's Ok I did some science, it looks like the array doesn't like me throwing zeros at the disk when it's 'offline'. If I take

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-10:10.openssl

2010-12-02 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-12-02 (00:05), jhell wrote: Try that with a ( make includes ) in that same directory and if it works then the advisory will have to be revised. Ah awesome, that works thanx. (I don't see why though, since it was only half complaining about a missing definition, even when I manually

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-10:10.openssl

2010-12-01 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Mon 2010-11-29 (21:19), FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: # cd /usr/src # patch /path/to/patch # cd /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl # make obj make depend make make install Hi all, I'm following the instructions with: # cvsup /etc/cvsup-src.conf # rm -rf /usr/obj # cd

ZFS raidz recovery

2010-11-27 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a disk fail and replacement in a raidz array and failing myself. What'm I doing wrong? Here's a transcript with interspersed commentary: r...@file:~# zpool status pool: raid state: ONLINE scrub: scrub completed after 0h0m with 0 errors on Sat Nov 27 13:20:06

Re: ZFS raidz recovery

2010-11-27 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Sat 2010-11-27 (07:30), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: uname -a please -- it matters greatly. $ uname -a FreeBSD file 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Nov 24 07:56:04 SAST 2010 r...@file:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/COWNEL amd64 ___

source tree out of sync

2010-09-21 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, in for example http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2.asc : # cd /usr/src # patch /path/to/patch # cd /usr/src/lib/libbz2 # make obj make depend make make install I assume I can't do this safely if my /usr/src tree has been updated since my last make world?

Re: source tree out of sync

2010-09-21 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-21 (11:31), Gareth de Vaux wrote: I assume I can't do this safely if my /usr/src tree has been updated since my last make world? Well, doesn't look like it's an issue for me in this instance. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-15 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-14 (13:54), Gareth de Vaux wrote: On Tue 2010-09-14 (04:30), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Regarding net.inet.tcp.finwait2_timeout=15000 -- you don't see any improvement at all? That's a bit strange. There's probably something If there was an improvement it was subtle (I

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-14 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (13:49), Gareth de Vaux wrote: Thirdly, if you feel FIN_WAIT2 is the cause of your problem, then you should consider adjusting the following sysctl: net.inet.tcp.finwait2_timeout Try something like 15000 (15 seconds) instead of the default (6). Ok that seems

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-14 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-14 (04:03), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: You're absolutely certain these are all in FIN_WAIT_2 state and not TIME_WAIT? Yup, $ netstat -an | grep FIN_WAIT_1 | wc -l 57 $ netstat -an | grep FIN_WAIT_2 | wc -l 431 $ netstat -an | grep TIME_WAIT | wc -l 17

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-14 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-14 (04:30), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Regarding net.inet.tcp.finwait2_timeout=15000 -- you don't see any improvement at all? That's a bit strange. There's probably something If there was an improvement it was subtle (I was doing sporadic measurements), just that in the end my

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-13 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (10:43), Jack Vogel wrote: No, not the add-on adapter, i have no trouble finding those, what I want to know about is the details about the system that has em0 LOM, only way to check on that is to have the whole enchilada :) Ah right. These are snippets from dmidecode, is

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-12 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (10:41), Gareth de Vaux wrote: Gareth, set hw.pci.honor_msi_blacklist=0, you'll have to do that at boot btw. Ok, I'll have to get back to you in a day or 2 when I reboot. Done: $ sysctl -a | grep msi hw.bce.msi_enable: 1 hw.pci.honor_msi_blacklist: 0 hw.pci.enable_msix

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-12 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (17:00), Gareth de Vaux wrote: On Thu 2010-09-09 (16:54), Kurt Jaeger wrote: -c asks for pci device capabilities, which are read in /usr/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.c:177 with O_RDWR Ah. I'll have to schedule a reboot then .. pciconf -lcv, onboard: e...@pci0:0:25:0

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-10 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (13:48), Jack Vogel wrote: Gareth's email bouncing for anybody else or is it just me? Yes sorry I disabled this alias after picking up years of spam on the mailman archives. I assumed people would primarily reply to the list. I've re-enabled it for now. Gareth, set

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-10 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (10:41), Gareth de Vaux wrote: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-September/058748.html Just to reiterate - those are the specs of the PCI card that doesn't work. The PCI card doesn't come up with MSIX failures. The onboard has the MSIX failures

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-10 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (09:20), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Secondly, I'm fairly certain HTTP KeepAlive (re: KeepAliveTimeout) are unrelated to TCP keepalives[1]. I mention this because you're focusing on netstat, which will give you indication of TCP session state, not HTTP protocol statefulness.

Re: ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-10 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Fri 2010-09-10 (03:18), Ian Smith wrote: Try using 'limit' rather than the unlimited 'keep-state' for inbound dynamic connections to your server/s. eg, derived from ipfw(8): These are mostly legitimate connections though, they just aren't being closed properly. So if limit were to have an

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Wed 2010-09-08 (09:41), Jack Vogel wrote: This is what'd I'd expect, the onboard is PCH chipset, support was not in 8.0, but as I said, in 8.1 (and hence stable/8) it is supported, and it should work. I've just paid the machine a visit and yes, MSIX fails on the onboard but the device still

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (06:13), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Can you add the -c flag to your pciconf command? Thanks. Forbidden? # pciconf -lvc pciconf: /dev/pci: Operation not permitted # pciconf -lc pciconf: /dev/pci: Operation not permitted # ls -l /dev/pci crw-r--r-- 1 root wheel0, 9 Sep 9

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (07:02), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: You need to be root to use the -c flag. Despite your prompt, I don't think you're root. Reproduction: That was as root, # id uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel),5(operator) # pciconf -lc pciconf: /dev/pci: Operation not permitted

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (07:24), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Is this within a jail or something else along those lines? I can't reproduce the problem otherwise. Frustrating! Someone else on the list might have ideas as to what could cause this. Nope, this's a normal host. I've got securelevel on 1,

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Thu 2010-09-09 (16:54), Kurt Jaeger wrote: -c asks for pci device capabilities, which are read in /usr/src/usr.sbin/pciconf/pciconf.c:177 with O_RDWR Ah. I'll have to schedule a reboot then .. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

ipfw: Too many dynamic rules

2010-09-09 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi again, I use some keep-state rules in ipfw, but get the following kernel message: kernel: ipfw: install_state: Too many dynamic rules when presumably my state table reaches its limit (and I effectively get DoS'd). netstat shows tons of connections in FIN_WAIT_2 state, mostly to my webserver.

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-08 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-07 (10:00), Jack Vogel wrote: First off, this device was not supported in 8.0 REL, what were you running that last worked? Hey, I was running 8.0 REL and it worked. I installed the system from the 8.0 .iso, but the onboard card didn't work. I added the PCI card and it worked.

Re: MSIX failure

2010-09-08 Thread Gareth de Vaux
On Tue 2010-09-07 (13:25), Jack Vogel wrote: I've looked at the code, this message was misleading, what really happens is that the driver fails to be able to setup either MSIX OR MSI, when this happens it will fall back and use a Legacy interrupt, so its non-fatal and the device should work

MSIX failure

2010-09-06 Thread Gareth de Vaux
Hi all, I moved from 8.0-RELEASE to last week's -STABLE: $ uname -v FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Thu Sep 2 16:38:02 SAST 2010 r...@x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC and all seems well except my network card is unusable. On boot up: em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.0.5 port 0x3040-0x305f

Re: portaudit

2007-08-28 Thread gareth
On Mon 2007-08-27 (17:09), Chuck Swiger wrote: This might imply that your system clock on that machine is wrong...? Double-check what it thinks is the date. date and time is synced. Also, make sure you don't have some old version stuck in an intervening proxy, if such is being used. it

portaudit

2007-08-27 Thread gareth
hey guys, for over a month i haven't been able to get a copy of the portaudit db. no-one else seems to be having this problem. this's what happens: # portaudit -F auditfile.tbz 100% of 43 kB 1045 kBps portaudit: Database too old. Old database restored.

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-12-28 (22:10), David Todd wrote: something's up, nothing in ports will write to a /tmp/download directory, so either you or someone with root access did it. thought as much :/ I suggest: checking /var/log/auth.log for attempted breachings i had a rough skim and nothing

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-12-29 (11:07), Matthew Seaman wrote: Oct 23 00:31:42 lordcow kernel: pid 48464 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 12 (core dumped) Oct 23 01:19:26 lordcow kernel: pid 17512 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 12 (core dumped) These are from autoconf testing various

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-12-29 (17:25), Thomas Nystr?m wrote: I just checked one of my servers and also found a /tmp/download directory with the same files that you had. I then compared the timestamp of /tmp/download with the timestamp of the directories in /var/db/pkg: Same. My conclusion is that

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-12-29 (19:48), Thomas Nystr?m wrote: It looks like this: ture(root)# dir total 50 drwxrwxr-x 5 root wheel512 29 Aug 16:29 ./ drwxrwxrwt 11 root wheel 3072 29 Dec 19:35 ../ drwxrwxr-x 4 root wheel512 29 Aug 16:29 Archive_Tar-1.3.1/ drwxrwxr-x 3 root wheel

Re: system breach

2006-12-29 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-12-29 (10:16), Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Apparently pkg_fetch will use either $PKG_TMPDIR or $TMPDIR as a temporary storage location for where things are stored. Taken from the manpage in pkgtools-2.2.2/man/pkg_fetch.1: PKG_TMPDIR TMPDIR (In that order) Temporary

system breach

2006-12-28 Thread gareth
hey guys, my server rebooted a few days ago, and while i was looking around for possible reasons (none came up, which's disconcerting in itself) i found this suspicious directory: $ ls -l /tmp/download total 44 drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel512 Oct 23 16:28 Archive_Tar-1.3.1 drwxr-xr-x 3 root

portupgrade

2006-12-03 Thread gareth
hi, portupgrade doesn't seem to be doing anything? this's the session: # portversion -l gnupg p5-Compress-Zlib p5-IO-Socket-SSL p5-PathTools portupgrade rsync spamass-milter #

Re: portupgrade

2006-12-03 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-12-03 (21:30), Kris Kennaway wrote: Update your ports tree? The index is probably newer than the actual ports. sorry i should've mentioned that, i always run this beforehand: cvsup -L 2 /etc/cvsup.conf portsdb -Fu ___

Re: cpu usage

2006-10-24 Thread gareth
On Mon 2006-10-23 (21:15), Tore Lund wrote: I have an XP 2200 in a normal ATX box with no extra fans. I have to change thermal paste about once a year. Even so, I monitor the temperature closely in the summertime and increase fan speed whenever necessary. So there is a chance that your

cpu usage

2006-10-23 Thread gareth
hi, i'm on FreeBSD 6.1, with a problematic cpu - it seems to be overheating and shutting the system down when running intensive jobs, at the moment i can't even finish compiling the mysql-server in ports. i've tried running the make with an increased nice level, but that doesn't seem to change

Re: cpu usage

2006-10-23 Thread gareth
On Mon 2006-10-23 (18:56), Oliver Fromme wrote: It shouldn't change anything. The nice level will not reduce the amount of work that your CPU is doing, it might only shift that amount between processes. ah ok. Depending on the type of your CPU (which you didn't tell us), it might be

kernel compilation error

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
hey guys, i have a fresh install of FreeBSD 6.1 and have only done a cvsup (with a 'ports-all' in my cvsup.conf file, that doesn't affect the kernel source does it?). now i added CFLAGS=-O -pipe, and NO_PROFILE=true to /etc/make.conf and tried to recompile the kernel: make buildkernel

Re: kernel compilation error

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-10-22 (14:39), Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 22.10.2006 um 12:07 schrieb gareth: now i added CFLAGS=-O -pipe, and NO_PROFILE=true to /etc/ make.conf and tried to recompile the kernel: make buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNEL ... /usr/src/sys/sys/buf.h: In function `vtruncbuf': /usr/src

portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
hi, i want to install a port but portaudit won't let me because it has known vulnerabilities. trying to tell it it's ok with 'portaudit_fixed' in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf doesn't work, and trying to deinstall portaudit: /usr/ports/security/portaudit# make deinstall === Deinstalling for

Re: portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-10-22 (20:03), Miroslav Lachman wrote: There are more than one way to install vulnerable port. Sometimes DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes may be enough. thanx, that did the trick. Permissions denied may be caused by your file system mount options - if you have /var (/var/db/pkg)

Re: portaudit

2006-10-22 Thread gareth
On Sun 2006-10-22 (19:33), Ronald Klop wrote: You can set DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true in the environment. In bash it is: export DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true thanx ;) But know what you are doing. I do not recommend you to install vulnerable ports. yes i don't feel to easy about it, my

Re: swiN: clock sio process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-21 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I wrote: About 6 minutes after booting (on two occasions; I don't guarantee that this doesn't vary), a process that appears in the output of ps as [swi4: clock sio] begins to use about 3/4 of the machine's CPU. I think it does so more or less instantaneously. It continues to do so

Re: swiN: clock sio process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-17 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I wrote: About 6 minutes after booting (on two occasions; I don't guarantee that this doesn't vary), a process that appears in the output of ps as [swi4: clock sio] begins to use about 3/4 of the machine's CPU. I think it does so more or less instantaneously. It continues to do so

swiN: clock sio process taking 75% CPU

2006-07-13 Thread Gareth McCaughan
, but I'll check the web archives and should therefore see any responses that go only to the list(s). Thanks in advance! -- Gareth McCaughan ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

fsck

2006-05-15 Thread gareth
hi, this box has had far too many hard reboots, but can anyone shed some light on whether this's inconsistent? i boot into single user mode, run fsck and fix all the partitions. rerunning fsck shows no more problems. mounting the filesystems and running fsck shows no problems. but when i reboot

Re: fsck

2006-05-15 Thread gareth
On Mon 2006-05-15 (14:54), Oliver Brandmueller wrote: Errm, You run fsck onto a r/w mounted partition on multiuser mode? If yep this understanding of what your saying here is correct, then this is the problem: a r/w mounted fs is a) never clean (in terms of a fsck that takes some time to

Re: fsck

2006-05-15 Thread gareth
On Mon 2006-05-15 (15:46), Oliver Brandmueller wrote: OK, I was not clear enough: During normal operations what's on the disk and the view of the system to the filesystem are not necessarily the same - this is especially true for open files. No matter how long it takes for fsck to run, a

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-05-12 (07:31), Jonathan Noack wrote: Ah, I made a mistake in my explanation. Replace INDEX-5.db with INDEX-5. Sorry for the confusion... make fetchindex downloads the INDEX-x file (where 'x' is the major release number of the version of FreeBSD you are using -- in this case

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread gareth
On Wed 2006-05-10 (11:29), Jonathan Noack wrote: You are probably experiencing some of the VFS limitations in 5.3 (you'll be pleasantly surprised by 6.1!). portsdb -Uu is very CPU and IO intensive; it takes a long time on a fast machine. make fetchindex is provided as a replacement for

portsdb

2006-05-10 Thread gareth
hey guys, i've been having this trouble on and off for quite awhile, sometimes while running 'portsdb -Uu' (after a cvsup) the box just freezes, along with the power? i'm running 5.3-RELEASE. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: portsdb

2006-05-10 Thread gareth
On Wed 2006-05-10 (09:31), gareth wrote: hey guys, i've been having this trouble on and off for quite awhile, sometimes while running 'portsdb -Uu' (after a cvsup) the box just freezes, along with the power? i'm running 5.3-RELEASE. ok, i did: cd /usr/ports rm INDEX* make fetchindex amongst

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-31 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (09:47), Kevin Oberman wrote: You can fix this by specifying the IPv4 address (137.158.128.11) in ntp.conf. I have been told that queries may be limited to IPv4 in ntp.conf, but the man page does not indicate this and I have not had time to dig into the sources. hah, that

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-31 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (13:22), jdow wrote: If you have ntpd running, which is the right way to do it anyway, then ntpdate cannot run unless you tell it to use a different port than the ntp port because it's already in use. ntpdate -q -u pool.ntp.org should work for you. nope i don't have ntp

ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
a Makefile.am Makefile.in in /usr/src/contrib/ntp/ntpdate/ ? do i need to go into /usr/src and type 'make'? thanx gareth ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (08:54), Scot Hetzel wrote: 2. change to sub directory where FreeBSD builds ntpdate: cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/ntpdate make clean make make install make clean cool, thanx, i found that earlier with a 'locate ntpdate | grep Makefile' and tried to run make

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (10:35), Michael Proto wrote: cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp make depend make make install yay, ok that works ta (going into /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp as opposed to /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/ntpdate) and the binary gets rebuilt. but, same problem :/ # ntpdate nom.uct.ac.za Looking for

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (11:18), Michael Proto wrote: Just curious, do you have ipv6 enabled in your kernel and working on your Ethernet interface? It looks like you're only getting an ipv6 address returned by the resolver for nom.uct.ac.za. I did a lookup myself and I got both an ipv4 and ipv6

Re: ntpdate

2006-03-30 Thread gareth
On Thu 2006-03-30 (18:24), gareth wrote: Perhaps someone with a better knowledge of the resovler can answer to why no ipv4 address is returned. yea. i get the ipv4 addy back from my linux machines. sorry that wasn't clear - when i run 'ntpdate nom.uct.ac.za' on my linux machines, i get

MIT Kerberos and OpenSSH

2005-01-11 Thread Gareth Hopkins
(0x280e3000) libpam.so.2 = /usr/lib/libpam.so.2 (0x280eb000) libcrypto.so.3 = /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x280f2000) libcrypt.so.2 = /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x281e7000) libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x281ff000) Thanks --- Gareth Hopkins Server Operations UUNET South Africa

Future support for PERC 4e/XX cards

2004-10-26 Thread Gareth Hopkins
Howdie, Was wondering if the following cards would be supported in the near future by BSD 4.10. PERC 4e/Si and PERC 4e/Di. These are from the new Dell poweredge 1850 and 2850 servers. --- Gareth Hopkins System Operations UUNET ZA ___ [EMAIL

DVD writer support in -STABLE?

2002-09-13 Thread Gareth McCaughan
I'm thinking about getting a DVD writer as a backup device for use with my -STABLE system. It's not clear to me what level of support there is for this in -STABLE. 1. If I just want to treat a DVD as an unusually large CD, will that just work? I mean, can I build a 4GB ISO9660 filesystem

Problem with make buildworld on a 3.3RC box

2001-02-08 Thread Gareth Hopkins
. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Is there a specific release I should be supping to? --- Gareth Hopkins To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message