On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 23, 2008, at 10:36, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:55:04PM -0500, Josh Carroll wrote:
I also
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I think I may have found an issue today with our bi-endian
structure, and I wanted to make sure whether or not it was an already
known issue (-m32 is broken for gcc with lib32/libgcc.a):
[r...@fbsd-7-test]# gcc -o boo boo.c # Compiles
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:36:08 +0100
Maciej Suszko mac...@suszko.eu wrote:
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I think I may have found an issue today with our bi-endian
structure, and I wanted to make sure whether or not it was an
already known issue (-m32 is broken for
I will extend topic to C++:
[19:38] zubr:~/Code (1) $ g++ -m32 -B /usr/lib32 p.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/ext/new_allocator.h:37,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/c++allocator.h:39,
from /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/allocator.h:53,
I also noticed that behavior, shouldn't compiler/linker look
into /usr/lib32 without additional -B switch?
--
regards, Maciej Suszko.
I don't know if it should or should not, but I can confirm that this
behavior was around in 7.0-RELEASE, so it's been that way for quite a
while, at least in
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:55:04PM -0500, Josh Carroll wrote:
I also noticed that behavior, shouldn't compiler/linker look
into /usr/lib32 without additional -B switch?
--
regards, Maciej Suszko.
I don't know if it should or should not, but I can confirm that this
behavior was around
On Dec 23, 2008, at 10:36, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:55:04PM -0500, Josh Carroll wrote:
I also noticed that behavior, shouldn't compiler/linker look
into /usr/lib32 without additional -B switch?
--
regards, Maciej Suszko.
I don't know
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 23, 2008, at 10:36, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:55:04PM -0500, Josh Carroll wrote:
I also noticed that behavior, shouldn't compiler/linker look
into
Hi guys,
I think I may have found an issue today with our bi-endian
structure, and I wanted to make sure whether or not it was an already
known issue (-m32 is broken for gcc with lib32/libgcc.a):
[r...@fbsd-7-test]# gcc -o boo boo.c # Compiles
[r...@fbsd-7-test]# gcc -m32 -o boo boo.c
