On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:59:13PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:49:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:16:51AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:59:13PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:49:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:17:50AM +0800, Darryl Yeoh wrote:
Nope. Just to be sure, I've tested this on another two machines at my office,
both are
Maybe gif interface is your default route?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello!
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Darryl Yeoh wrote:
While destroying gif interface, I notice it also removes IPv4 default route.
Has anyone else
encountered this ?
Command:
# netstat -rn -f inet
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:26:08PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 14.08.2006 um 22:07 schrieb Darryl Yeoh:
While destroying gif interface, I notice it also removes IPv4
default route. Has anyone else
encountered this ?
No problem on a FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #8: Fri Jun 16 17:15:03 CEST
Am 16.08.2006 um 10:11 schrieb Yar Tikhiy:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:26:08PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 14.08.2006 um 22:07 schrieb Darryl Yeoh:
While destroying gif interface, I notice it also removes IPv4
default route. Has anyone else
encountered this ?
No problem on a FreeBSD
Hello!
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
The question is: Do all the routes really need to be flushed upon
the destruction of an interface?
I've killed devd on my test machine (yesterday's RELENG_6) and done
the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig vlan0 create
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:46:39 +0300 (EEST)
Dmitry Pryanishnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
The question is: Do all the routes really need to be flushed upon
the destruction of an interface?
I've killed devd on my test machine (yesterday's
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc. destroy the tun interface they're
using when they exit? Flushing all routes then would be rather
harmful. I'm glad I haven't updated to a newer -stable yet then :-)
In general, no since tun
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc. destroy the tun interface they're
using when they exit? Flushing all routes then would be rather
harmful. I'm glad I haven't
Am 16.08.2006 um 10:11 schrieb Yar Tikhiy:
In turn, pccard_ether will flush all -inet routes if the rc.conf(5)
variable removable_route_flush is set to YES, which is its default
setting.
Why is it doing that, then? From the commit message for 1.23 for src/
etc/pccard_ether, which
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc. destroy the tun interface they're
using when they exit? Flushing
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:49:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:49:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM
Am 14.08.2006 um 22:07 schrieb Darryl Yeoh:
While destroying gif interface, I notice it also removes IPv4
default route. Has anyone else
encountered this ?
No problem on a FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #8: Fri Jun 16 17:15:03 CEST 2006.
You don't happen to have any devfs rules that would cause this?
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:26:08 +0200
Stefan Bethke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 14.08.2006 um 22:07 schrieb Darryl Yeoh:
While destroying gif interface, I notice it also removes IPv4
default route. Has anyone else
encountered this ?
No problem on a FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #8: Fri Jun 16
Hi lists,
While destroying gif interface, I notice it also removes IPv4 default route.
Has anyone else
encountered this ?
Command:
# netstat -rn -f inet
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire
default10.1.1.1
19 matches
Mail list logo
