On Jun 10, 2011, at 17:25, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Am I missing something? How about using fletcher[24] for dedup?
Fletcher is fairly weak as things go, and so even though two checksums are the
same, there's a decent chance that the data is actually different. At least
with recent releases
On Jun 10, 2011, at 17:24, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Dedup can require a huge amount of RAM, or a dedicated L2ARC SSD, depending
on the size of your storage. You should not enable it unless you are
prepared for the consequences.
Under OpenSolaris, each tracking entry for a deduped block
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
Follow-up, since we're gradually upgrading our ZFS-based RELENG_8
servers to ZFSv28. Committers/those involved should see my very last
paragraph.
First, server upgrades:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
We tried using dedup on one of our systems, but within 10-15 minutes
turned it off. I believe the added CPU overhead of dedup was causing
the system to act bursty in other non-ZFS-related tasks; e.g. turn on
dedup, then in a SSH window hold down the
06.06.2011 13:53, Martin Matuska написав(ла):
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
Am I missing something? How about using fletcher[24] for dedup?
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
- triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
- zfs diff
- zpool split
- snapshot holds
- zpool import -F. Allows to rewind
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:46:19AM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Marius Strobl
mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Marius Strobl
mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:46:19AM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Marius Strobl
mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Marius Strobl
mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
- triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
- zfs
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
- triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
- zfs diff
- zpool split
- snapshot holds
- zpool import -F. Allows to rewind corrupted pool to earlier
transaction group
- possibility to import pool in
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
- triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
- zfs diff
- zpool split
- snapshot holds
- zpool import -F. Allows to rewind
On 06/06/11 06:53, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
- triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
- zfs diff
- zpool split
- snapshot holds
- zpool import -F. Allows to rewind corrupted pool to earlier
Hello, Martin Matuska!
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200
m...@freebsd.org wrote about HEADS UP: ZFS v28 merged to 8-STABLE:
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
finally! Thanks!
My home server works ok with this update.
--
Lystopad Olexandr
Thanks. Everything works fine.
2011/6/6 Lystopad Olexandr l...@laa.zp.ua:
Hello, Martin Matuska!
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200
m...@freebsd.org wrote about HEADS UP: ZFS v28 merged to 8-STABLE:
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
finally! Thanks
14 matches
Mail list logo