Hello!
On Sat, 13 May 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:58:26AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
FYI, INVARIANTS adds checks but does not (is not supposed to) divert
code paths.
It does at least in UMA; it does a lot of
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:58:26AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
FYI, INVARIANTS adds checks but does not (is not supposed to) divert
code paths.
It does at least in UMA; it does a lot of bzero()/NULL'ing out of
memory, which
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:37:40AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
With respect to INVARIANTS, you just need to get used to the fact
that running thousands of checks for bugs is incompatible with
running at optimal speed.
(I'm not sure what the point of
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:52:32AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:37:40AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
With respect to INVARIANTS, you just need to get used to the fact
that running thousands of checks for bugs is
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:58:26AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
FYI, INVARIANTS adds checks but does not (is not supposed to) divert
code paths.
It does at least in UMA; it does a lot of bzero()/NULL'ing out of
memory, which might hide later
