Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-29 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
On Wednesday, 29 December 2010, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: Another note too, I think I read that you mentioned using the L2ARC and slog device on the same disk You simply shouldn't do this it could be contributing to the real cause and there is absolutely no gain in either sanity or

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Hi On 27 December 2010 16:04, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: 1) Set vfs.zfs.recover=1 at the loader prompt (OK set vfs.zfs.recover=1) 2) Boot into single user mode without opensolaris.ko and zfs.ko loaded 3) ( mount -w / ) to make sure you can remove and also write new zpool.cache as needed.

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
On 29 December 2010 03:15, Jean-Yves Avenard jyaven...@gmail.com wrote: # zpool import load: 0.00  cmd: zpool 405 [spa_namespace_lock] 15.11r 0.00u 0.03s 0% 2556k load: 0.00  cmd: zpool 405 [spa_namespace_lock] 15.94r 0.00u 0.03s 0% 2556k load: 0.00  cmd: zpool 405 [spa_namespace_lock] 16.57r

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard Now, I haven't tried using cache and log from a different disk. The motherboard on the server has 8 SATA ports, and I have no free port to add another disk. So my only option to have both a log and cache device in my zfs pool, is to use two

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Martin Matuska
Please don't consider these patches as production-ready. What we want to do is find and resolve as many bugs as possible. To help us fix these bugs, a way to reproduce the bug from a clean start (e.g. in virtualbox) would be great and speed up finding the cause for the problem. Your problem

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Hi On Wednesday, 29 December 2010, Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org wrote: Please don't consider these patches as production-ready. What we want to do is find and resolve as many bugs as possible. To help us fix these bugs, a way to reproduce the bug from a clean start (e.g. in virtualbox)

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-28 Thread jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/28/2010 18:20, Martin Matuska wrote: Please don't consider these patches as production-ready. What we want to do is find and resolve as many bugs as possible. I completely agree with Martin here. If your running it then your willing to loose

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-26 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
tried to force a zpool import got a kernel panic: panic: solaris assert: weight = space weight = 2 * space, file: /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/metaslab.c, line: 793 cpuid = 5 KDB: stack backtrace #0: 0xff805f64be at kdb_backtrace #1 ..

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-26 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Responding to myself again :P On 27 December 2010 13:28, Jean-Yves Avenard jyaven...@gmail.com wrote: tried to force a zpool import got a kernel panic: panic: solaris assert: weight = space weight = 2 * space, file:

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-26 Thread jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/26/2010 23:17, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: Responding to myself again :P On 27 December 2010 13:28, Jean-Yves Avenard jyaven...@gmail.com wrote: tried to force a zpool import got a kernel panic: panic: solaris assert: weight = space weight

Re: New ZFSv28 patchset for 8-STABLE: Kernel Panic

2010-12-26 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Hi On 27 December 2010 16:04, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: Before anything else can you: (in FreeBSD) 1) Set vfs.zfs.recover=1 at the loader prompt (OK set vfs.zfs.recover=1) 2) Boot into single user mode without opensolaris.ko and zfs.ko loaded 3) ( mount -w / ) to make sure you can