Hi all. I've come across a possible Clang regression that recently
crept into stable/9. I'd like to check to see whether it's a true bug
or if I jacked something up. It appears all object files are created
with mode 0600 rather than honoring umask. This breaks installworld
for me. I use a
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:39:19AM -0500, James wrote:
Hi all. I've come across a possible Clang regression that recently
crept into stable/9. I'd like to check to see whether it's a true bug
or if I jacked something up. It appears all object files are created
with mode 0600 rather than
On 2012-05-29 18:27, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:39:19AM -0500, James wrote:
Hi all. I've come across a possible Clang regression that recently
crept into stable/9. I'd like to check to see whether it's a true bug
or if I jacked something up. It appears all object files
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 06:59:17PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
Just so you know, this is indeed a regression that has crept into clang,
and even into the 3.1 release. :(
I'm working on fixing it in head, then I will merge the fix to stable/9
in a few days.
Very cool; should be in time
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com wrote:
Just so you know, this is indeed a regression that has crept into
clang, and even into the 3.1 release. :(
I'm working on fixing it in head, then I will merge the fix to
stable/9 in a few days.
Cool. Thanks much
On 2012-05-29 18:59, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-05-29 18:27, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:39:19AM -0500, James wrote:
Hi all. I've come across a possible Clang regression that recently
crept into stable/9. I'd like to check to see whether it's a true bug
or if I jacked
