On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:53:15PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
John Baldwin writes:
| On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Bruno Ducrot writes:
| | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006
In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:53:15PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
John Baldwin writes:
| On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Le 12 oct. 06 à 17:00, Bill Moran a écrit :
In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The device_printf() function take too much time I think, so you
get the same
behaviour as the DELAY().
True. Problem is that I considered that possibility, and removed the
device_printf(), rebuild
In response to Olivier Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would be happy to test help, I also have a PE1950 around waiting for
this problem to be solved to go in production. I would just need to
have
the patch. (I'll check the list archive later, I just joined
freebsd-stable today)
There
Le 12 oct. 06 à 18:03, Bill Moran a écrit :
There isn't really a patch per-se. Just a bunch of recommendations
on where to put extra debugging information. You'll find it in the
archives.
ok thanks, I'll check.
Btw, it would be nice if the patched if_bce.c could also be
integrated
into
In response to Olivier Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Btw, it would be nice if the patched if_bce.c could also be integrated
into the cvs (http://yogurt.org/FreeBSD/if_bce.c). At the moment (beg.
of the week) I still had to patch the source tree by hand to keep the
network
interface working
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 15:16 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Olivier Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Btw, it would be nice if the patched if_bce.c could also be integrated
into the cvs (http://yogurt.org/FreeBSD/if_bce.c). At the moment (beg.
of the week) I still had to patch the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier Mueller
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dell 1950 does not properly respond to reboot and
shutdown -p
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 15:16
In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bruno Ducrot writes:
| On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Hi,
|
| On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
|
|A reboot causes the
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bruno Ducrot writes:
| On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Hi,
|
| On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM
John Baldwin writes:
| On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Bruno Ducrot writes:
| | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| | In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| | Hi,
| |
| |
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 13:20, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
John Baldwin writes:
| On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Bruno Ducrot writes:
| | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| | In response
Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the power
button cleanly shuts down the OS)
I'm posting this to stable@, but the same
In response to Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the power
button cleanly shuts down
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the power
button
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
What exactly are the last few lines?
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 12:42, Guy Helmer wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits
there on the shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to
In response to Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Guy Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff
In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
What exactly are the last few lines?
(manually
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on
the shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p does the same.
Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as advertised. (i.e. hitting the
power button cleanly shuts down the OS)
I'm posting this to stable@,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
shutdown screen.
A shutdown -p
Bruno Ducrot writes:
| On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Hi,
|
| On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
|
|A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
|
22 matches
Mail list logo
