Re: Strange number of mbufs

2006-02-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:52:09AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: A Running 5.4-CURRENT. Web server. About 150 virtual servers. A A %netstat -m A A 4294481198 mbufs in use A 4294662679/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max) A 0/694/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) A 3463545 KBytes allocated

Re: Strange number of mbufs

2006-02-03 Thread Artem Kuchin
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:52:09AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: Running 5.4-CURRENT. Web server. About 150 virtual servers. %netstat -m 4294481198 mbufs in use What does this mean? Do i really have 4294481198 mbufs in use? How is this possible? This is fixed in

Re: Strange number of mbufs

2006-02-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:37:32AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: A This is fixed in 6.0-RELEASE. In 5.x the true values can be obtained A via 'vmstat -z'. A A Which number from output of vmstat -z indicates mbufs? I don't see it A there. vmstat -z | grep Mbuf MbufClust: 2048,25600,

Re: Strange number of mbufs

2006-02-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:52:09AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote: Running 5.4-CURRENT. Web server. About 150 virtual servers. %netstat -m 4294481198 mbufs in use 4294662679/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max) 0/694/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 3463545 KBytes allocated to