Re[2]: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-21 Thread Shunsuke SHINOMIYA
Jeremie, thank you for your comment. I did simple benchmark at some settings. I used two boxes which are single Xeon 2.4GHz with on-boarded em. I measured a TCP throughput by iperf. These results show that the throughput of TCP increased if Interrupt Moderation is turned OFF. At least,

Re: Re[2]: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-21 Thread Sean McNeil
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 21:27 +0900, Shunsuke SHINOMIYA wrote: Jeremie, thank you for your comment. I did simple benchmark at some settings. I used two boxes which are single Xeon 2.4GHz with on-boarded em. I measured a TCP throughput by iperf. These results show that the throughput

Re: Re[2]: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-21 Thread Matthew Dillon
: I did simple benchmark at some settings. : : I used two boxes which are single Xeon 2.4GHz with on-boarded em. : I measured a TCP throughput by iperf. : : These results show that the throughput of TCP increased if Interrupt :Moderation is turned OFF. At least, adjusting these parameters affected

Re[2]: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-19 Thread Shunsuke SHINOMIYA
Hi, Jeremie, how is this? To disable Interrupt Moderation, sysctl hw.em?.int_throttle_valve=0. However, because this patch is just made now, it is not fully tested. if you suppose your computer has sufficient performance, please try to disable or adjust parameters of Interrupt Moderation

Re[2]: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-18 Thread Shunsuke SHINOMIYA
Hi list, if you suppose your computer has sufficient performance, please try to disable or adjust parameters of Interrupt Moderation of em. In my router(Xeon 2.4GHz and on-board two em interfaces) case, it improves a router's packet forwarding performance. I think the interrupt delay by