It seems that it work. Thanks.
Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q) you should specify em, for tun, vice
versa... what a mess, hehe.
Cuk
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:00:32AM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote:
Resend...
Please, does anyone have any ideas...
What is the
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote:
It seems that it work. Thanks.
Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q) you should specify em, for tun, vice
versa... what a mess, hehe.
No prob; I don't see why using the em(4) backing the tun(4) wouldn't
work for ALTQ _IF_ you actually tagged
)).
The problem with tun(4) in contrast to vlan(4) is that in some cases the
packet has to go through userland (i.e. userland PPPoE). During this detour
the packet loses the ALTQ mbuf_tag and thus can no longer be stuck into the
right queue. That is why there is ALTQ support on tun(4) eventhough
Resend...
Please, does anyone have any ideas...
What is the status of the tun0 driver and ALTQ ?
I have FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and have tried it without success. Why 6.0 ?
Don't know... curious maybe... if you think, that 5.4 will work better,
I'll reinstall it.
The tun0 is because od xDSL (
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:00:32AM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote:
Resend...
Please, does anyone have any ideas...
What is the status of the tun0 driver and ALTQ ?
I have FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and have tried it without success. Why 6.0 ?
Don't know... curious maybe... if you think, that 5.4 will
