Hi all,
Removing IPF for 5.4-STABLE seems to have made the boxes stable. I
switched all the firewalls to PF and they haven't crashed since, its been
about 3 days now... (before they were crashing every 12 hours).
Here are my worries:
1) If I were to put this machine into production, it
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:07:59PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
Hi all,
Removing IPF for 5.4-STABLE seems to have made the boxes stable. I
switched all the firewalls to PF and they haven't crashed since, its been
about 3 days now... (before they were crashing every 12 hours).
Of course,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:07:59PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
Removing IPF for 5.4-STABLE seems to have made the boxes stable. I
switched all the firewalls to PF and they haven't crashed since, its been
about 3 days now... (before they were crashing every 12 hours).
The similar situation:
After changing to PF I did not notice single crash for month (production
servers with, sometimes, heavy load).
I would try FreeBSD with PF anyway. Works perfectly.
You say it didn't crash for a month, but then you say to try FreeBSD with
PF because it works perfectly. To me, a month of
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:53:20PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
You say it didn't crash for a month, but then you say to try FreeBSD with
PF because it works perfectly. To me, a month of uptime isn't perfectly.
It is, comparing to two- or three-day uptime periodic when it crashes. With
IPF.
On Thursday 30 June 2005 23:58, Maciej Wierzbicki wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:53:20PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
You say it didn't crash for a month, but then you say to try FreeBSD with
PF because it works perfectly. To me, a month of uptime isn't perfectly.
It is, comparing to
On Thursday 30 June 2005 22:53, Matt Juszczak wrote:
After changing to PF I did not notice single crash for month
(production servers with, sometimes, heavy load).
I would try FreeBSD with PF anyway. Works perfectly.
You say it didn't crash for a month, but then you say to try FreeBSD
Could you not use pfsync to mitigate the problem (at least
partially)? As for your original question, I think its less
work to change your hardware to something you know works than
changing operating systems. Why not use single CPU machines
for this?
My boss refuses :-(
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:07:59 -0400 (EDT)
Matt Juszczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[...]
Therefore, part of me is thinking of switching back to either 4.11 or to
OBSD 3.7. Problem is, this switch wouldn't be temporary, it would have to
be permanant. I couldn't set things up now and then move
