Well, I felt that if you went through the trouble of creating a 'release'
then you should check to see what is important to upgrade and what is not.
The main thing is that a 'point' or minor release (e.g. v4.6.x.x not v4.x or
major releases (v4.0 vs v5.0), usually doesn't do a port/package
I think 4.6.1 should contain following kernel fixes:
1.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=100548+0+archive/2002/freebsd-stable/20020630.freebsd-stable
2.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1982827+0+archive/2002/cvs-all/20020630.cvs-all
3.
Sure - the newest security fixes go into the release as
well, but why
not Matt's most recent bug fixes?
Why not include OpenSSL 0.96d, ipfw2, gcc 3.1 and while we're at it
everyone else's pet software? Where would you draw the line? IMO,
4.6.1 s/b a point patch release.
Maybe
On July 08, 2002, Gavin Atkinson sent me the following:
Hello!
2. Please check why /usr/share/examples/kld and /usr/share/examples/drivers
are empty (while been OK in CVS repositary) both in 4.6-RELEASE and
4.6-RELEASE-p1.
From memory, /usr/share/examples/cvsup was also empty,
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 01:55:20 -0700
Murray Stokely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The release engineers, port managers, and security officer team are
currently working on a conservative set of changes to merge to the
RELENG_4_6 branch in preparation for a 4.6.1 release. This point
release will
