Doug Barton wrote:
Chris H. wrote:
Greetings all,
...
Quoting Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have
that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way,
though).
Hi.
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:39:55 +0200
Oliver Brandmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to prioritize 10.10.10.10 over 192.168.0.10? How do i
configure it?
...
For serious redundancy with failover and/or load balancing with a good
leveling you should consider getting a load
Hi,
One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, i configured
his www as such
just an example:
wwwIN A 10.10.10.10
wwwIN A 192.168.0.10
Is there a way to prioritize 10.10.10.10 over 192.168.0.10? How do i
configure it?
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:00:23PM +0800, pinoyskull wrote:
One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, i configured
his www as such
wwwIN A 10.10.10.10
wwwIN A 192.168.0.10
Is there a way to prioritize 10.10.10.10 over 192.168.0.10? How do i
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:00:23PM +0800, pinoyskull wrote:
One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, i configured
his www as such
wwwIN A 10.10.10.10
wwwIN A 192.168.0.10
Is there a way to prioritize 10.10.10.10 over
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 11:50, Dominic Marks wrote:
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:00:23PM +0800, pinoyskull wrote:
One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, i configured
his www as such
wwwIN A 10.10.10.10
wwwIN A
From the original message:
[1]
wwwIN A 10.10.10.10
wwwIN A 192.168.0.10
From pen homepage:
This is pen, a load balancer for simple tcp based protocols such as http or
smtp.
As I know DNS uses both tcp and udp protocols.
From the posters excerpt it looks like they
Dominic Marks wrote:
From the original message:
[1]
wwwIN A 10.10.10.10
wwwIN A 192.168.0.10
From pen homepage:
This is pen, a load balancer for simple tcp based protocols such
as http or smtp.
As I know DNS uses both tcp and udp protocols.
From the posters
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:00:23PM +0800, pinoyskull wrote:
One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy, i configured
his www as such
wwwIN A 10.10.10.10
wwwIN A 192.168.0.10
Is there a way to prioritize 10.10.10.10 over 192.168.0.10? How do i
configure
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have
that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way,
though). Whenever one of the servers fails, around half of the requests
still goes there and then times out/gets conn
pinoyskull wrote:
Hi,
One of my client's domain has multiple IPs for redundancy,
This really isn't on topic for any of the FreeBSD lists, FYI. If the
responses you have received so far haven't helped you, I would suggest
that you write up a little more detail about what you're trying to
Greetings all,
...
Quoting Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have
that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way,
though). Whenever one of the servers fails, around half of the
Greetings,
...
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Greetings all,
...
Quoting Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have
that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way,
though).
Chris H. wrote:
Greetings all,
...
Quoting Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have
that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way,
though). Whenever one of the servers fails,
14 matches
Mail list logo
