On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:54:12PM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:39:55PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Ok, try attached patch.
Index: sys/dev/re/if_re.c
===
--- sys/dev/re/if_re.c
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:39:55PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
Ok, try attached patch.
Index: sys/dev/re/if_re.c
===
--- sys/dev/re/if_re.c(revision 187352)
+++ sys/dev/re/if_re.c(working copy)
@@ -158,6
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will
PY start using them today. However, as it has worked without problems
PY for weeks with the buggy version before, I
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:19:10AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will
PY start using them today. However, as it has worked
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:24:00 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY I had to reboot some of the machines meanwhile and could do some
PY further testing. One strange thing I noticed is that the
PY re-interfaces often do not come up in a working state after
PY
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:41:43AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:24:00 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY I had to reboot some of the machines meanwhile and could do some
PY further testing. One strange thing I noticed
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:39:55 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY Ok, try attached patch.
Thanks, building new images right now. I'll be back later (next week).
cu
Gerrit
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 08:58:12AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:46:55 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY Since you're using RTL8169SC it could be related with my commit
PY r180519(cvs rev 1.95.2.22). It seems that RTL8169SC does
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will
PY start using them today. However, as it has worked without problems
PY for weeks with the buggy version before, I
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:05:46 +0100 Gerrit Kühn ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de
wrote about Re: fun with if_re:
GK Sorry to be back so soon again, but I just noticed that I did in fact
GK not produce new images yesterday. :-)
GK Kernel build stopped with
[...]
Ignore me, my bad (downloaded the webpage
As I don't own that server anymore, I'm afraid I can't tell you whether
it's working now. :(
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:31:47AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:37:53PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
Hey.
I have had similar symptoms on a dedicated server with the
Hi folks,
I have several routers here which are based on Jetway J7F4 ITX boards that
come with two onboard re-interfaces. I run 7-stable on them via nanobsd
and update them about once in three or four months.
After the last update (11th December 2008) I have noticed the following
strange
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:05:07AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
Hi folks,
I have several routers here which are based on Jetway J7F4 ITX boards that
come with two onboard re-interfaces. I run 7-stable on them via nanobsd
and update them about once in three or four months.
After the last
Am 04.02.2009 um 10:05 schrieb Gerrit Kühn:
After the last update (11th December 2008) I have noticed the
following
strange behaviour on at least two machines (identical hard- and
software):
After weeks of flawless operation, the network connection on both
interfaces suddenly starts to
Hey.
I have had similar symptoms on a dedicated server with the re driver.
What I did was grab more recent drivers (which might be redundant now)
and disable a set of features that weren't stable at the time.
Please have a look at this PR that I submitted back then:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:37:53PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
Hey.
I have had similar symptoms on a dedicated server with the re driver.
What I did was grab more recent drivers (which might be redundant now)
and disable a set of features that weren't stable at the time.
re(4) had
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:46:55 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY Since you're using RTL8169SC it could be related with my commit
PY r180519(cvs rev 1.95.2.22). It seems that RTL8169SC does not like
PY memory mapped register access and I think jkim@ committed
17 matches
Mail list logo
