Hello!
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:15:51 -0800, Dave Tweten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Now you see why I recommend that people wait for a month after a release
to update and to do it to STABLE, not release.
I agree wholeheartedly. I'm surprised your truth was accepted as
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Where do you plan to release of 4.10 or 4.9.1? There is not info on
http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html
There are plans for at least one, and likely two, more releases on the
RELENG_4 branch. And there could well be more if there is
From: Felipe Neuwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:35:07 -0200
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Folks,
I always have the doubt... And when the stables goes to 5.3, how I'll
update my 4.9-STABLE servers to the 5.3-STABLE? If I download the source
from cvs and compile it, it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Now you see why I recommend that people wait for a month after a release
to update and to do it to STABLE, not release.
I agree wholeheartedly. I'm surprised your truth was accepted as calmly
as it was. When I offered the same suggestion a few years ago I was
I'll go even further. Yesterday Apple (http://www.apple.com)
anounce the formal release date of March 24, 2001 for OS X.
Jessem.
On 10 Jan, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
Actually it says right now on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/
that 4.3 will be available in
On Wednesday January 10, 2001 23:22, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
Actually it says right now on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/
that 4.3 will be available in late March. It seems unusual that
such a precise time would be placed on the release already. I
think the date
Not really. We
Good to know. Sorry for the slightly off topic reply to -stable now.
I was going by the fact that the date for 4.2 was not mentioned on the
website (even though I had seen it mentioned in the mailing lists), nor
But it IS listed on the web site and has for some time now. Please
see
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 08:48:08AM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
UCB and ATT had agreed that there were to be no new releases of BSD
and that 4BSD was the final release. 4.1BSD - 4.4BSD were named such
because they were "officially" only modifications to 4BSD and as
be avoided,
at no cost, by calling the next release FreeBSD 5.0.
I agree too.
I don't... FreeBSD is FreeBSD, and BSD is BSD - IMHO it doesn't matter
that the people who don't know the difference get confused, if they're
interested they'll find out. The versioning model of FreeBSD is good
at
