On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:24:36AM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
What kind of ppp do you use: kernel (devices ppp + process pppd) or user
(devices tun + process ppp)? It seems to me that kernel ppp is seriously
broken in RELENG_6, but I've never succeeded in getting a crashdump (my
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:03:19AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Well, that's what you posted, but it was nonsensical. However, gdb is
sometimes confused about stack traces, which is why I asked for a
trace from DDB instead.
So, I've compiled in DDB and after two days uptime got another
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:14:20PM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:03:19AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Well, that's what you posted, but it was nonsensical. However, gdb is
sometimes confused about stack traces, which is why I asked for a
trace from DDB instead.
Hello!
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Pavel Gubin wrote:
I've got some machine which is almost idle and works now almost only as dialup
server. The problem was that this machine was very stable under 5.4-RELEASE,
but after upgrading (via buildworld/installworld) to 6.0-RELEASE-p4 and then
to
Hello,
I've got some machine which is almost idle and works now almost only as dialup
server. The problem was that this machine was very stable under 5.4-RELEASE,
but after upgrading (via buildworld/installworld) to 6.0-RELEASE-p4 and then
to 6.1-PRERELEASE (4 days ago) the machine panices
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:42:05AM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
Hello,
I've got some machine which is almost idle and works now almost only as dialup
server. The problem was that this machine was very stable under 5.4-RELEASE,
but after upgrading (via buildworld/installworld) to 6.0-RELEASE-p4
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:48:24AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I've got some machine which is almost idle and works now almost only as
dialup
server. The problem was that this machine was very stable under 5.4-RELEASE,
but after upgrading (via buildworld/installworld) to 6.0-RELEASE-p4
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:58:33AM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:48:24AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I've got some machine which is almost idle and works now almost only as
dialup
server. The problem was that this machine was very stable under
5.4-RELEASE,
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:00:38AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:58:33AM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:48:24AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I've got some machine which is almost idle and works now almost only as
dialup
server. The
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:08:16PM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:00:38AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:58:33AM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:48:24AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I've got some machine which is almost
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:36:15AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
What compiler flags are you using to build your kernel?
The build was done with make buildkernel KERNCONF=Fet, and seems that
/etc/make.conf does not contain variables that can have any effect on
compiler:
Strange.
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:42:54PM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:36:15AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
What compiler flags are you using to build your kernel?
The build was done with make buildkernel KERNCONF=Fet, and seems that
/etc/make.conf does not
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:58:33AM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
No, there was full buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld
cycle, and now all files in /boot/kernel are dated 2-Mar-2006.
Maybe you still have nvidia.ko build for 5.4?
___
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:36:28AM +0300, Igor Robul wrote:
No, there was full buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld
cycle, and now all files in /boot/kernel are dated 2-Mar-2006.
Maybe you still have nvidia.ko build for 5.4?
No, I haven't nvidia.ko at all.
--
Pavel Gubin
14 matches
Mail list logo
