On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm wondering can I
commit this to
9-stable now? (or is it already in?)
It didn't make it because there was only sparse feedback after the
On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm wondering
can I commit this to
9-stable now? (or is it already
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.comwrote:
On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it
Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
Vnodes and mbufs on a machine with 24gb ram is limited to the same amount as a
machine with less than 4GB ram.
This was fixed in head but not merged back in time.
This results in poor out of the box performance on 10gige and servers
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.comwrote:
Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
Vnodes and mbufs on a machine with 24gb ram is limited to the same amount
as a machine with less than 4GB ram.
This was fixed in head but not merged back in
On 19.08.2013 18:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.com
mailto:alf...@ixsystems.com wrote:
Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
Vnodes and mbufs on a machine with 24gb ram is limited to the same amount
as
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 19.08.2013 18:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.com
mailto:alf...@ixsystems.com wrote:
Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2
Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
Vnodes and mbufs on a machine with 24gb ram is limited to the
same amount as a machine with less than 4GB ram.
This was fixed in head but not merged back in time.
This results in poor
On 8/19/13 9:19 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
mailto:an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 19.08.2013 18:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Alfred Perlstein
alf...@ixsystems.com
Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm
wondering can I commit this to 9-stable now? (or is it already in?)
Would you do the honors?
-Alfred
On 7/8/13 7:37 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann
On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm wondering can I
commit this to
9-stable now? (or is it already in?)
It didn't make it because there was only sparse feedback after the
call for testers. There were a couple of
Bezüglich Pascal Drecker's Nachricht vom 16.07.2013 21:42 (localtime):
...
IMHO, this is considered a new feature, and not a critical bug
fix. re@
asked from the start of the code slush to avoid new features, and
at
this point, it is too late. It is not worth introducing
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
Bezüglich Pascal Drecker's Nachricht vom 16.07.2013 21:42 (localtime):
...
IMHO, this is considered a new feature, and not a critical bug
fix. re@
asked from the start of the code slush to
Op maandag 15 juli 2013 schreef Alfred Perlstein (alf...@ixsystems.com) het
volgende:
On 7/15/13 7:13 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On
Op maandag 15 juli 2013 schreef Alfred Perlstein
(alf...@ixsystems.com) het
volgende:
On 7/15/13 7:13 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.07.2013 08:38,
On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in the following
configurations:
6-8GB ram + 10gigE ethernet using iozone over NFS.
As you haven't seen any problems yet I've asked RE to green light
the MFC.
--
Andre
We're rolling it into
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in the following
configurations:
6-8GB ram + 10gigE ethernet using iozone over NFS.
As you haven't seen any problems yet I've asked RE to green light
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in the
following configurations:
6-8GB ram + 10gigE ethernet using iozone over NFS.
As you haven't seen
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in the
following configurations:
6-8GB
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, we have a
On 7/15/13 7:13 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 05:48:40AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/15/13 5:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.07.2013 08:38, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 13.07.2013 09:47, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in
Andre, we have a number of people running this patch in the following
configurations:
6-8GB ram + 10gigE ethernet using iozone over NFS.
We're rolling it into the PCBSD rolling update as well. I'm thinking it
makes sense to roll this into the 9.2 release to give us more scalability.
On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a machine and give
feedback.
On 7/11/13 12:44 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a
machine and give
- Original Message -
From: Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll
On 11.07.2013 11:08, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
On 08.07.2013 16:37, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Yes.
Andre, Peter what about i386?
Ever since I touched this Peter has been worried about i386 and said we've
broken the platform.
I'm going to boot some vms but maybe we ought to get some testing from Peter on
i386?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 11, 2013, at 5:47 AM, Andre Oppermann
Please test on VMs.
I've tested -HEAD in i386 virtualbox all the way down to 128mb with no
panics. I'll test with 64mb soon. It's easy to do.
i think the i386 PAE stuff on ${LARGE} memory systems is still broken. Peter?
-adrian
On 11 July 2013 07:59, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.com
- Original Message -
From: Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk
Cc: Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.com; sta...@freebsd.org;
r...@freebsd.org; nones...@longcount.org
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: status of autotuning
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a machine and give
feedback.
http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/mfc-autotuning-20130708.diff
This is
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Yes. Please give me your proposed changes and I'll stand up a machine
and give feedback.
On 08.07.2013 16:41, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
mailto:an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 07.07.2013 20:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Can you help me with with testing?
Andre,
Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning
-stable before 9.2?
I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet another
release that can't do basic 10gigE when sufficient memory exists.
If you don't have time, then let me know and I'll see what
On 07.07.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre,
Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning -stable
before 9.2?
I simply ran out of time on Friday and MFCing such a big change requires
more testing.
I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet
On 7/7/13 1:34 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 07.07.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre,
Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for
auto-tuning -stable before 9.2?
I simply ran out of time on Friday and MFCing such a big change requires
more testing.
I fear (maybe
35 matches
Mail list logo
