Hello,
thanks to Oliver and Michael for explain me the mechanics
behind timecounter and Hz quality.
I have send the question, why i have to wonder about
different IRQ-Counts but same HZ. It is really thaat HZ on
both machines is the same.
I have only knowed the old behavior.
I set the HZ over
martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After digging in the source i have found that timec.c have an routine for
computing the so called Hz quality.
During boot, the kernel probes several time counters and
assigns
Hello,
i be very surprised about the performance of RELENG_6.
Congratulations to the entire Team for this very good work.
Now i have 2 Machines installed with 6.0-RC1, and i have seen that on
both machines the Hz is differntly with GENERIC-Kernel.
Machine A is an Sempron 2400+ that runs as 2500+
Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i be very surprised about the performance of RELENG_6.
Congratulations to the entire Team for this very good work.
Now i have 2 Machines installed with 6.0-RC1, and i have seen that on
both machines the Hz is differntly with GENERIC-Kernel.
sysctl
On Monday, 7. November 2005 17:10, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i be very surprised about the performance of RELENG_6.
Congratulations to the entire Team for this very good work.
Now i have 2 Machines installed with 6.0-RC1, and i have seen that on
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i be very surprised about the performance of RELENG_6.
Congratulations to the entire Team for this very good work.
Now i have 2 Machines installed with 6.0-RC1, and i have seen that on
both machines the Hz is differntly with
