Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-11 Thread Alex Shubnikov
Use gpart and add created partition to your raidz- for example [code] backupstorage# gpart create -s GPT ad0 backupstorage# gpart add -b 34 -s 1953525101 -i 1 -t freebsd-zfs -l disk0 ad0 backupstorage# gpart show =34 1953525101 da0 GPT (932G) 34 19535251011

Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-10 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:27:21 -0700 Elliot Finley efinley.li...@gmail.com wrote about Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel: EF I ran into this same problem. you need to clean the beginning and end EF of your disk off before glabeling and adding it to your pool. clean EF with dd if=/dev/zero... Hm, I think

Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-10 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:24:12AM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote: On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:27:21 -0700 Elliot Finley efinley.li...@gmail.com wrote about Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel: EF I ran into this same problem. you need to clean the beginning and end EF of your disk off before glabeling

Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-10 Thread Marius Nünnerich
2010/2/10 Gerrit Kühn ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de: On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 13:27:21 -0700 Elliot Finley efinley.li...@gmail.com wrote about Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel: EF I ran into this same problem.  you need to clean the beginning and end EF of your disk off before glabeling and adding it to your

Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-10 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:18:49 +0100 Marius Nünnerich mar...@nuenneri.ch wrote about Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel: MN It seems there is some kind of race condition with zfs either picking MN up the disk itself or the label device for the same disk. I guess it's MN which ever it probes first

zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-09 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Hi, I have created a raidz2 with disk I labeled with glabel before. Right after creation this pool looked fine, using devices label/tank[1-6]. I did some tests with replacing/swapping disks and so on. After doing a zpool offline tank label/tank6 remove disk camcontrol rescan all insert disk

Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-09 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote: Hi, I have created a raidz2 with disk I labeled with glabel before. Right after creation this pool looked fine, using devices label/tank[1-6]. I did some tests with replacing/swapping disks and so on. After doing a zpool

Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-09 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:26:58 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote about Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel: JC I'm running out of ideas here... JC Would zpool export and zpool import be necessary in this case? I tried that several times, does not change anything. JC Also, I'm a little

Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-09 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: Also, I'm a little confused as to the use of glabel in this case. In what condition do your disk indices (e.g. X of daX) change? Are you yanking multiple disks out of a system at the same time and then shoving

Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-09 Thread Elliot Finley
I ran into this same problem. you need to clean the beginning and end of your disk off before glabeling and adding it to your pool. clean with dd if=/dev/zero... 2010/2/9 Gerrit Kühn ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de Hi, I have created a raidz2 with disk I labeled with glabel before. Right after

Re: zpool vdev vs. glabel

2010-02-09 Thread Ronald Klop
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:10:21 +0100, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: Also, I'm a little confused as to the use of glabel in this case. In what condition do your disk indices (e.g. X of daX) change? Are you