Don Bowman wrote:
From: Uwe Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don Bowman wrote:
I have a machine running:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD machine.phaedrus.sandvine.com 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD
4.9-STABLE #0:
Fri Mar 19 10:39:07 EST 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/LABDB i386
...
I have merged asr.c
I have tried enabling PREEMPTION on 5.3-RELEASE-p5 whilst it ran OK
for a few hours, it crashed overnight whilst doing a make index in
/usr/ports. I've tried repeating make index and it worked. I have
a coredump of the crash and have been doing some poking around.
A backtrace (with the nonsense
Uwe Doering wrote:
Don Bowman wrote:
I have merged asr.c from RELENG_4 to get this fix:
Fix a mis-merge in the MFC of rev. 1.64 in rev. 1.3.2.3; the following
change wasn't included:
- Set the CAM status to CAM_SCSI_STATUS_ERROR rather than CAM_REQ_CMP
in case of a CHECK CONDITION.
since I guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:24:25 -0500, Matt Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just installed 5.3-R on a spare machine, which is equipped with a D-Link
DFE-530TX network card.
This is a typical Digital 21440A-based card which has worked fine fine
Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 02:19 PM 28/02/2005, David O'Brien wrote:
How come the tenderbox report sfor RELENG_5 don't go to this mailing
list? I was watching this list while waiting for my own 'make world' to
finish. (but then passed out)
Perhaps it didnt pick up the
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In 6-CURRENT, HZ is 1000 for amd64, i386, and ia64, but 100 for other
platforms (i.e., ppc, arm, and alpha).
HZ is (and always was) 1024 on alpha.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hello freebsd-stable,
Searching a hints I've visited the
http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ site, but after applying a
corresponding patch for a -stable I've faced up with the same error
as without the patch. The entire output of the make install
command looks like a following:
===
Whilst tracking down some interrupt latency problems, I've found that
I'm getting duplicate interrupts from some, but not all, devices. The
double interrupts appear to always occur for some IRQs and never occur
on others. Based on those symptoms, I wonder if there's a hardware
issue.
The system
i got updated my source tree with cvsup and tag=RELENG_5 and i got such
an error everytime i want to do make -j4 buildworld:
cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe -march=pentium3
-DMAGIC='/usr/share/misc/magic' -DBUILTIN_ELF -DELFCORE
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/src/lib/libmagic
Hi,
In the planning i saw that the RELENG_5 source would be frozen feb 2.
Will this still happen or not?
Just curious,
Mipam.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:13:32 +0100 (MET), Mipam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the planning i saw that the RELENG_5 source would be frozen feb 2.
Will this still happen or not?
That was a month ago...
- --
G. Stewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't be
John Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0) Save the shar attachment to libusb.shar
1) backup your existing .so files then pkg_delete -f libusb-0.1.7_1
2) (as root) cd /usr/ports/devel
3) backup your libusb: mv libusb libusb.orig
4) sh /path/to/libusb.shar
I suggest to remove point 1), and add
5)
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
We run sendmail on our systems in the field to hold and send email (but never
receive it from the outside world) and I would like to be able to suppress
bounce generation.
The local user sending the email on the system has it's email redirected
outside (to us back at
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:13:32 +0100 (MET), Mipam mipam at ibb.net wrote:
In the planning i saw that the RELENG_5 source would be frozen feb 2.
Will this still happen or not?
That was a month ago...
Yes, but any reasons that this date will not be met?
Hi,
i have relatively early updated my XFree to Xorg. In Version 6.7.x
it has an problematic driver for Intel's Ich2 I815 Graphik-Card.
The Developers say's this should be fixed in 6.8.1, may i have seen that
it's not really. The failures are a little bit less then fromer with
6.7.x but it's
Hi!
I have a brand new Dell Inspiron 9100 laptop with a broadcom integrated
NIC.
I get a panic with 5.3-SNAP, 5.4-PRE and 6.0-SNAP due to a storm
interrupt as soon as I assign an IP address to it (ifconfig or
dhclient).
The storm interrupt is reported on irq18: bfe0 uhci2.
I have manage to use
i tried also to do: make build world but it does not helped ... the same
error was shown.
I have no idea what caused that, maybe someone of you know the reason
and resolution?
Greets
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 02:00:05PM +0100, Mipam wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:13:32 +0100 (MET), Mipam mipam at ibb.net wrote:
In the planning i saw that the RELENG_5 source would be frozen feb 2.
Will this still happen or not?
That was a month ago...
Yes, but any reasons that this
The patch at
http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/carp-RELENG_5-patch
has been updates to reflect latest changes commited to HEAD.
If you are using it please send me your reports, both positive
and negative. Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:13:36PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:39 -0800, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say something is very wrong on your systems and I'd ALMOST bet it's
ata related. Maybe ATA-MkIII would help things out.
Possibly, altho' I doubt it given that the only
From: Uwe Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Did you merge 1.3.2.3 as well? This actually should have
been one MFC
Yes, merged from RELENG_4.
I will post later if this happens again, but it will be quite
a long time. The machine has 7 drives in it, there are only
3 ones left old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:32:02 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the process that does the FFT in kernel, niced, or rtprio'd?
last pid: 93131; load averages: 0.96, 0.49, 0.24 up 0+05:18:20 15:29:47
48 processes: 2 running,
Dear colleagues,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src uname -a
FreeBSD gwhx.rinet.ru 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 1
08:22:54 UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/lh/src/sys/MINI amd64
defining CPUTYPE=athlon64 in /etc/make conf renders loader unusable: it builds
with athlon64
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src uname -a
FreeBSD gwhx.rinet.ru 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 1
08:22:54 UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/lh/src/sys/MINI amd64
defining CPUTYPE=athlon64 in /etc/make conf renders loader unusable: it builds
with
Anybody did this?
Any help is appreciateed
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my nightly status report, towards the end, I see the word
vacuuming..., by itself, with no context. I don't see mention of it in
anything under /etc or /usr/src, except games/fortune or share/dict.
Google suggests this is something Postgres does, and while Postgres is
installed and running
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
BB In my nightly status report, towards the end, I see the word vacuuming...,
BB by itself, with no context. I don't see mention of it in anything under
BB /etc or /usr/src, except games/fortune or share/dict. Google suggests this
BB is something
On a couple of machines here (my laptop and an SMP build machine), I
track each of RELENG_4 and RELENG_5 on a daily basis. I do this by
using separate bootable slices.
As a consequence of doing things this way, I have become accustomed to
using boot0cfg to switch the default boot slice when I
% ls /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/*pgsql*
see /etc/periodic/daily/999.local
I have poor english. sorry.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:50:02 -0800 (PST),
Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my nightly status report, towards the end, I see the word
vacuuming..., by itself, with no
Uops ... it doesn't work great :(
I've a raid 1 between disk n.1 and disk n.3.
When I try to disconnect and reconnect disk n.3, the array is critical,
but when I try to rebuild that with:
sysctl -w hptmv.status=hpt 0 rebuild 1,1
I receive always the same error:
sysctl: hptmv.status: invalid
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
check for /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/502.pgsql installed by PostgreSQL
port...
There ya go. Thanks.
Brian
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue 01.03.2005 17:49, lhmwzy wrote:
Please reply to hk at alogis dot com. This is not my native
account.
Subject: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ?
Yes
Anybody did this?
Yes.
Any help is appreciateed?
Boot from FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-CD and install. No problems
so far. You
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:24:58 +0100
From: Godwin Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:39 -0800, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say something is very wrong on your systems and I'd ALMOST bet it's
ata related. Maybe ATA-MkIII would
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:36:11 +0100
From: Godwin Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:32:02 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the process that does the FFT in kernel, niced, or
Hi,
played with dmalloc and the docu says to do the following in gdb:
(gdb) sharedlibrary
(gdb) add-shared-symbol-files
This command is not available in this configuration of GDB.
(gdb) break dmalloc_error
Why is this command not available? The code in question is at
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Oberman
Sent: 3/2/2005 10:45:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Xorg 6.8.1 and SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:36:11 +0100
From: Godwin Stewart
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:24:25 -0500, Matt Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just installed 5.3-R on a spare machine, which is equipped with a
D-Link
DFE-530TX network card.
This is a typical Digital 21440A-based card which has worked fine fine
under 4.x before.
Something misdetected
Hi All,
I am the Freebsd+Xfce4 user from Turkey. Recently (on 26th of Feb 2005),
I've CVSUP my system using stable-suppfile and ports-suppfile. And un
expectedly my system became 5.4 Prelease. I've installed firefox 1.0
and mozilla 1.7, and also flashplugin for them from the ports directory.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:21:07 -0800, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please DON'T top post to any FreeBSD list!
Who was top-posting? I certainly wasn't! I hate that moronic practice with
a vengeance.
Only mildly less annoying is people
Indeed, just installed on a customer's server last night, and I build
SMP support into the GENERIC kernel this morning. Only issues I
encountered has to do w/ recognizing the full 4GB of RAM, but this
apparently has some compatibility issues w/ the amr driver.
As per Holger's comments about
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:24:25 -0500, Matt Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just installed 5.3-R on a spare machine, which is equipped with a
D-Link
DFE-530TX network card.
This is a typical Digital 21440A-based card which has worked fine
fine
under 4.x before.
Something
On 03/01/05 23:23, Ege Mukan wrote:
Hi All,
I am the Freebsd+Xfce4 user from Turkey. Recently (on 26th of Feb 2005),
I've CVSUP my system using stable-suppfile and ports-suppfile. And un
expectedly my system became 5.4 Prelease. I've installed firefox 1.0
and mozilla 1.7, and also flashplugin for
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:07:08 -0500
Matt Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After doing this and reinstalling the card, it was properly detected
(and is functional!).
_Always_ try to do a physical reinstall of a card (if possible) as the
last step before giving up. Vard connectors are still
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Phil Schulz wrote:
On 03/01/05 23:23, Ege Mukan wrote:
Hi All,
I am the Freebsd+Xfce4 user from Turkey. Recently (on 26th of Feb 2005),
I've CVSUP my system using stable-suppfile and ports-suppfile. And un
expectedly my system became 5.4 Prelease. I've installed firefox 1.0
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 23:05, Chuck Swiger wrote:
The local user sending the email on the system has it's email redirected
outside (to us back at base) so we're not the bounce messages provide
pretty much zero useful information and just slow the link down when it
does come back.
Does
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Whilst tracking down some interrupt latency problems, I've found that
I'm getting duplicate interrupts from some, but not all, devices. The
double interrupts appear to always occur for some IRQs and never occur
on others. Based on those symptoms, I
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a brand new Dell Inspiron 9100 laptop with a broadcom integrated
NIC.
I get a panic with 5.3-SNAP, 5.4-PRE and 6.0-SNAP due to a storm
interrupt as soon as I assign an IP address to it (ifconfig or
dhclient).
The storm interrupt is
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, David Wolfskill wrote:
On a couple of machines here (my laptop and an SMP build machine), I
track each of RELENG_4 and RELENG_5 on a daily basis. I do this by
using separate bootable slices.
As a consequence of doing things this way, I have become accustomed to
using
man sendmail
-N dsn Set delivery status notification conditions to dsn, which can
be `never' for no notifications ...
^
Use that for mail submission.
You can also set the envelope from to if you really don't care about
bounces (in addition to
FYI, the architecture of the 2850 (assuming it is similar to your 2800)
requires that you enable PAE support in your kernel of whatever OS you run
to address the full 4GB of RAM. This is due in some part because of the
memory mapping that was done for the PCI express bus and/or onboard Perc
On 1 Mar, Doug White wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a brand new Dell Inspiron 9100 laptop with a broadcom integrated
NIC.
I get a panic with 5.3-SNAP, 5.4-PRE and 6.0-SNAP due to a storm
interrupt as soon as I assign an IP address to it (ifconfig or
51 matches
Mail list logo
