Hi, list.
One from my monitoring servers running with
FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Nov 10 11:03:10 UTC 2006 i386
Under heavy load it panic several times per day. Backtrace accesable:
http://clh.higis.ru/~dimma/btfull.0
Can somebody take a look?
I send Problem Report, but not get feed back now
Matthew Jacob wrote:
YMMV and your message is content free. I use sio all the time as a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] w/o any problems.
On 11/12/06, Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know an old sio driver is hardly usable?
There are many silo overflows, working with a terminal device
Ivan Voras wrote:
- The showstopper: Sysinstall completes (though slowly), but on reboot
the loader doesn't go further than the F1 prompt :( This is very
curious, since when booting from install CD the loader shows it
recognizes the CD drive and drives A: and C:, so BIOS seems to be ok. If
I
There's something unusual going on and I don't know what else to try.
Finally, after fiddling with various options, I've sort-of got it to
work by creating two slices (s1, s2), setting root partition on s1a and
the rest (/usr, /var, etc.) on s2. Now, the F1 prompt boot stage
behaves like
O. Hartmann пишет:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Do you know an old sio driver is hardly usable?
There are many silo overflows, working with a terminal device is a
nightmare. There was a report about one crash with a message about a
spinlock holed more than 5 seconds (there is no core dump
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Pete French wrote:
There's something unusual going on and I don't know what else to try.
Finally, after fiddling with various options, I've sort-of got it to
work by creating two slices (s1, s2), setting root partition on s1a and
the rest (/usr, /var, etc.) on s2. Now, the
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:26:36PM -0600, Barry Boes wrote:
B After the last hang I added giant locks back in and the machine has
B been up since.
B
B I don't have a serial console, just a graphic console. When the
B machine hangs it stops replying to ethernet packets at all protocol
B levels
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Yes. Havent done the stock case yet, but will do so later today.
---Mike
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Спартак Радченко wrote:
I had serious problems with sio on Intel STL2 motherboard and recent
stable. Massive silo overflows (modem was almost unusable) and at least
1 sio-related panic (spinlock held for more than 5 sec). Now I changed
sio to uart ant it works like a charm. All problems
Download, burn to CD and run http://www.memtest86.com/
Usually problems of this sort are faulty ram.
I had a buddy getting odd errors on copying files that happenned at
random.
Turned out to be bad ram too.
I recently had this same problem with a recent 6-STABLE and thought the
same thing.
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 06:36 AM 11/13/2006,
=?KOI8-R?Q?=F3=D0=C1=D2=D4=C1=CB_=F2=C1=C4=DE=C5=CE=CB=CF?= wrote:
O. Hartmann ÐÉÛÅÔ:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Do you know an old sio driver is hardly usable?
There are many silo overflows, working with a terminal device is a
nightmare. There was a
Andriy Gapon wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Aaron Burke wrote:
SNIP
(FreeBSD 4.x) : cd /usr; tar clpf - . | (cd /mnt; tar xvf -)
(FreeBSD 5.x+) : cd /usr; gtar clpf - . | (cd /mnt; gtar xvf -)
iirc tar(1) has changed in 5.3. why do you use gtar please? is new tar
Ivan Voras wrote:
- The less serious problem: It looks like a whole bunch of built-in
devices is routed to irq 29: bce, ciss, ohci and ehci. I notice last
three are giant locked, which doesn't look good, especially since this
should be a loaded web server.
If it's really only a web
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:33:24PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
If it's really only a web server, then you probably don't
need the USB ports. In that case you should remove ohci
and ehci from your kernel. The USB interrupt handler is
quite heavy-weight, so it can have a noticeable impact if
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:33:24PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
If it's really only a web server, then you probably don't
need the USB ports. In that case you should remove ohci
and ehci from your kernel. The USB interrupt handler is
quite heavy-weight, so it can have
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Yes. Havent done the stock case yet, but will do so later today.
Do you have a comparison with Linux under the same circumstances?
___
Hello,
I will soon get some new servers with more than 4 GB of RAM, and
I am wondering if they will work fine even with the PAE
option activated: are all the required drivers (RAID mfid, bce
on the Dell, ciss0 on the HP) 100% compatible, or should I expect
trouble?
If you have a working
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:44:31AM +0300, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
Hi, list.
One from my monitoring servers running with
FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Nov 10 11:03:10 UTC 2006 i386
Under heavy load it panic several times per day. Backtrace accesable:
http://clh.higis.ru/~dimma/btfull.0
Olivier Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I will soon get some new servers with more than 4 GB of RAM, and
I am wondering if they will work fine even with the PAE
option activated: are all the required drivers (RAID mfid, bce
on the Dell, ciss0 on the HP) 100% compatible, or should I expect
trouble?
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:30:09PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I will soon get some new servers with more than 4 GB of RAM, and
I am wondering if they will work fine even with the PAE
option activated: are all the required drivers (RAID mfid, bce
on the Dell, ciss0 on the HP) 100%
On Nov 10, 2006, at 6:35 PM, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote:
For the pg configuration, I use this on a 4Gb box:
max_connections = 100
shared_buffers = 7 # min 16 or
max_connections*2, 8KB each
work_mem = 262144 # min 64, size in KB
Thank you very much.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:19:45AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'll agree with this (re: webservers not needing USB), except in
regards to one item: keyboards.
More and more x86 PCs these days are expecting keyboards to be
USB-based. Yes, PS/2 ports are still present on most (but not
Same for me Greg.
Everything I use runs on serial console including my *BSD servers, SUN,
DSLAMs etc.
I would say any server worth it's weight has serial redirection in it's
BIOS.
Most of the servers I admin are international and I use the sesrial console
to fix problems if and when they
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:22:39PM +0100, Greg Byshenk wrote:
Don't you really need to have a monitor, as well? I _have_ worked
blind before, but I didn't enjoy it. I can imagine having a
keyboard with me when wandering around, but wouldn't normally have
a monitor. I had always thought
Get $1 Shipping on Your entire Purchase at The History Education Shop.
(Offer ends 12/19)
Shop Now
http://newsletters.aetv.com/cgi-bin15/DM/y/eXgs0K6nDL0EFr0Trf0ED
Our latest release of award-winning interactive lesson
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Without it, the 2 streams are definitely lossy on the management interface
---Mike
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Without it, the 2 streams are definitely lossy on the management interface
---Mike
Ok, and would you be able to test the polling options as well?
Scott
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 22:14 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Drivers that are either known to NOT work with PAE or were not
tested with PAE are excluded by the PAE config file, you can
check there.
So it looks like all of them should work fine with PAE.
merci!
Btw, when will we see these new
Just experienced an interrupt storm on an em device that disabled a
server until I could reboot it.
My initial research turned up this thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-November/058336.html
Which seems related, even if it is a little old. I'm aware that there
have
At 12:50 PM 11/13/2006, Ivan Voras wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Yes. Havent done the stock case yet, but will do so later today.
Do you have a comparison with Linux under the same circumstances?
I had a disk
On 11/13/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just experienced an interrupt storm on an em device that disabled a
server until I could reboot it.
My initial research turned up this thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-November/058336.html
Which seems related,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:57:50PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 22:14 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Btw, when will we see these new servers listed under:
http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html ?
And you absolutely have no option of running
Hi,
I just installed FreeBSD 6.2-BETA3 (amd64) on a Dual Xeon DC 5140 w/
4GB of RAM and a 3ware 9550SX connected to 8x Seagate 250GB SATA
drives (RAID5) and instead of the normal great performance I get from
FreeBSD, it's taking over an hour to do a 'portsnap extract' and
while it's
Hey. I've got one new machine for testing for 1-2 days... here's some output..
With the latest drivers (cvsup'ed from yesterday)
Send box: 2x Intel Xeon 5110 (1.6GHz), SuperMicro X7-DBE, Intel Pro/1000 MT
Server Adapter
DMESG
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5110 @ 1.60GHz (1600.01-MHz
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:50 PM 11/13/2006, Ivan Voras wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Yes. Havent done the stock case yet, but will do so later today.
Do you have a comparison with Linux under the same
could upgrade gnome
2.14-2.16 with buildworld -j2 going at the same time)
old dmesg: http://www.omut.org/~lxv/bbox-dmesg-20060824
new dmesg (-v): http://www.omut.org/~lxv/bbox-dmesg-20061113-v
kernel config: http://www.omut.org/~lxv/bbox-GENERIC-BBOX
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Thank
Olivier Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I will soon get some new servers with more than 4 GB of RAM, and
I am wondering if they will work fine even with the PAE
option activated: are all the required drivers (RAID mfid, bce
on the Dell, ciss0 on the HP) 100% compatible, or should I expect
trouble?
If
I am reading this document:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.4/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html
Does |-march=|pentium3 imply |-mfpmath=sse?|
Thanks,
Jason C. Wells
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Jason C. Wells wrote:
I am reading this document:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.4/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html
Does |-march=|pentium3 imply |-mfpmath=sse?|
Thanks,
Jason C. Wells
No. I tried such flags, and there were some applications that failed
with -march=athlon64
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:36:01PM -0500, Alex Vasylenko wrote:
I tried to upgrade an amd64x2 box from FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #36: Mon Sep
4 11:22:15 EDT 2006 to FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Mon Nov 13 10:01:57
EST 2006 and found that a newly built kernel panics on boot and locks
up solid after
At 06:36 AM 11/13/2006,
=?KOI8-R?Q?=F3=D0=C1=D2=D4=C1=CB_=F2=C1=C4=DE=C5=CE=CB=CF?= wrote:
O. Hartmann ÐÉÛÅÔ:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Do you know an old sio driver is hardly usable?
There are many silo overflows, working with a terminal device is a
nightmare. There was a report about one
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:57:50PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Olivier Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I will soon get some new servers with more than 4 GB of RAM, and
I am wondering if they will work fine even with the PAE
option activated: are all the required drivers (RAID mfid, bce
on the Dell,
Hi All,
Unfortunately our company hasn't had the resources to help FreeBSD
much over the years, but I do want to say thank you to the folks who
are helping sort out this issue with the em driver.
That Intel gigabit interface is very, very common on server hardware
nowadays and it means a
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:56:21PM -0800, Russell Jackson wrote:
Whatever that last em commit was, it seems to have made the interrupt
issues better. It still seems high, but it's a lot better than the
2000/s I was getting before.
interrupt total rate
irq1:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:45:05PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:44:31AM +0300, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
Hi, list.
One from my monitoring servers running with
FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Nov 10 11:03:10 UTC 2006 i386
Under heavy load it panic several
45 matches
Mail list logo
