Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Mikolaj Golub schrieb am 22.01.2010 23:26 (localtime):
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:06:23 +0100 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Dear all,
I have no idea why top crashes with segmentation fault on my amd64
machine running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2.
If someone wants to have a loot
Hi All,
Today I ran into the BUG documented in the aliases man-page.
If you have compiled sendmail with DBM support instead of NEWDB, you
may have encountered problems in dbm(3) restricting a single alias to
about 1000 bytes of information. snip
Looking at
Colin wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
I must admit that the ins and outs of paging and interrupts are
something I don't have much expertise in. I've asked the colo company
to look into it but I've put the output of those commands into
pastebin incase anything stands out.
Alexander V. Chernikov schrieb am 24.01.2010 10:24 (localtime):
...
gdb /usr/bin/top top.core
bt
And sure a backtrace from the top built with -g would be much better.
cd /usr/src/usr.bin/top
CFLAGS=-g make
Unfortunately nss_ldap seems to be the culprit.
There is some strange problem with TLS
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Alexander V. Chernikov schrieb am 24.01.2010 10:24 (localtime):
...
gdb /usr/bin/top top.core
bt
And sure a backtrace from the top built with -g would be much better.
cd /usr/src/usr.bin/top
CFLAGS=-g make
Unfortunately nss_ldap seems to be the culprit.
There is
Garrett Moore wrote:
I've been watching my memory usage and I have no idea what is consuming
memory as 'Active'.
Last night I had around 6500MB 'Active' again, 1500MB Wired, no inact, ~30MB
buf, no free, and ~100MB swap used. My performance copying ZFS-ZFS was
again slow (1MB/s). I tried
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[...]
Last night I tried ZFS with pool on iSCSI connected Dell MD3000i and I
was suprised by too low speed of simple cp -a command (copying from UFS
partition to ZFS) The write speed was about 2MB/s only.
After looking in to ARC stuff, I realized some weird values:
2010/1/22, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
Putting the swap into it's own slice and then putting FreeBSD into
it's own slice worked fine. So why the hell can't they both coexist in
1 slice if the swap comes first?
Similar problem here: I have a full-zfs system in a bsd slice, but I
have the
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. f...@gothschlampen.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
Hi,
I recently found
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. f...@gothschlampen.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010
Note: Since my issue is slow performance right off the bat and not
performance degradation over time, I decided to start a separate
discussion. After installing a fresh pure ZFS 8.0 system and building
all my ports, I decided to do some benchmarking. At this point, about
a dozen of ports has been
Well,
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with which
I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots at all (ASUS
P6T6-WS Revolution) and due to the fact I'm using Windows 7 sometimes
for recreational gaming, I'd like to have a moderate expensive audio
board
version should handle this and some other problems:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100124.patch
Try it please. Thanks.
--
Alexander Motin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS.
Perhaps i can help you with that.
You seem to be running a single mirror, which means you won't have any speed
benefit regarding writes,
devices. It made
request processing stop in some cases, where retries would be expected.
New patch version should handle this and some other problems:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100124.patch
Try it please. Thanks.
This patch works extremely well! Thanks.
---
Gary
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:50, spil.oss@ wrote:
Hi All,
Today I ran into the BUG documented in the aliases man-page.
If you have compiled sendmail with DBM support instead of NEWDB, you
may have encountered problems in dbm(3) restricting a single alias to
about 1000 bytes
Hi jhell,
aliases can be used as mailing-lists (remember to also have a
listname-owner alias if you wish to use it that way)
And there is a work-around, also documented in the aliases man-page.
split it up in multiple parts that are lists again
mailinglist: mailinglist-part1,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13.01.2010 11:52, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
Hi list,
I would like to know if there is a way to completely
replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal
is to have corresponding files on the traditional places
(not in /usr/local) and to use
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS.
Perhaps i can help you with that.
You seem to be running a single
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:03:33PM -0500, jhell wrote:
...
That's either one hell of a pipe or the owner of that email address can be
proud that no-one will ever email him/her ;)
st...@example.com: p...@example.com, v...@example.com, employ...@example.com, \
...
sa...@example.com:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
ZFS writes to a mirror pair
requires two independent writes. If these writes go down independent I/O
paths, then there is hardly any overhead from the 2nd write. If the
writes
go through a bandwidth-limited shared path
Hi,
I've been experiencing a troubling issue with a Marvell 8072 NIC on an HP
ProBook 4710s.
I first noticed that there is a problem while transferring some files
through scp to a FreeBSD8-STABLE server: CPUs usage sky-rocketed to 100%
(system)
and network performance was awful (about 1.8
:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100124-03-sysinstall-root-1g.diff
Another entirely untested patch would compress the symbol files:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100124-04-kernel-compress-symbols.diff
It would be interesting to see if (a) they work and (b) how much the
latter would safe.
/bz
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 07:39:11PM +0100, Emanuele A. Bagnaschi wrote:
Hi,
I've been experiencing a troubling issue with a Marvell 8072 NIC on an HP
ProBook 4710s.
I first noticed that there is a problem while transferring some files
through scp to a FreeBSD8-STABLE server: CPUs usage
In message cf9b1ee01001240759j2476cf3es2babd8b32a90f...@mail.gmail.com, Dan N
aumov writes:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote=
:
Hey,
I just updated my kernel from RELEASE_8_0 to RELENG_8 and by rutine I
compare my dmesg -a output to make sure everything still works as expected.
I notices that the ata-driver suddently downgraded the speed of my Intel
ICH5 SATS150 from SATA150 til UDMA133 - and I am not allowed to
Hey,
I just updated my kernel from RELEASE_8_0 to RELENG_8 and by rutine I
compare my dmesg -a output to make sure everything still works as expected.
I notices that the ata-driver suddently downgraded the speed of my Intel
ICH5 SATS150 from SATA150 til UDMA133 - and I am not allowed to change
O. Hartmann wrote:
Well,
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with which
I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots at all (ASUS
P6T6-WS Revolution) and due to the fact I'm using Windows 7 sometimes
for recreational gaming, I'd like to have a moderate
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :(
The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:43:14 -, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
If so: yes, FreeBSD's USB driver appears to lack support for these. Or,
well, it did on RELENG_7 (which is a completely different USB driver),
so it sounds like RELENG_8 needs some work in this regard.
I
On 01/18/10 22:13, O. Hartmann wrote:
Symptome: All boxes have ZFS and UFS2 filesystems. Since two weeks or
so, sometimes the I/O performance drops massively when doing 'svn
update', 'make world' or even 'make kernel'. It doesn't matter what
memory and how many cpu the box has, it get stuck for
On 01/24/10 03:02, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Alexander V. Chernikov schrieb am 24.01.2010 10:24 (localtime):
Please try to rebuild port with
post-configure:
@${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's/^\(CFLAGS .*\)-O2 \(.*\)$$/\1 -O0 \2/'
${WRKSRC}/nss/Makefile
That should be pre- or post- patch, since it's
Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/24/10 03:02, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Alexander V. Chernikov schrieb am 24.01.2010 10:24 (localtime):
Please try to rebuild port with
post-configure:
@${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's/^\(CFLAGS .*\)-O2 \(.*\)$$/\1 -O0 \2/'
${WRKSRC}/nss/Makefile
That should be pre- or post-
On 01/24/10 15:10, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/24/10 03:02, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Alexander V. Chernikov schrieb am 24.01.2010 10:24 (localtime):
Please try to rebuild port with
post-configure:
@${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's/^\(CFLAGS .*\)-O2 \(.*\)$$/\1 -O0 \2/'
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sam Leffler s...@errno.com wrote:
Russell Yount wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Sam Leffler s...@errno.com
mailto:s...@errno.com wrote:
Russell Yount wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Sam Leffler s...@errno.com
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:47:46PM -, Krzysztof Dajka wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:43:14 -, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
If so: yes, FreeBSD's USB driver appears to lack support for these. Or,
well, it did on RELENG_7 (which is a completely different USB driver),
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent
Hi,
I am running a server with several jails. They were created using
ezjail. What is the best way, to allow jail internal admin to manage
ports/packages by himself?
By default ezjail shares ports tree between basejail and otherjails. Is
there a way for each jail to have a separate ports
Hi,
I am trying to installworld:
/usr/share/man/man8/bootpgw.8.gz - /usr/share/man/man8/bootpd.8.gz
rm: /usr/share/man/man8/bootpgw.8: Not a directory
rm: /usr/share/man/man8/bootpgw.8.gz: Not a directory
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/libexec/bootpd.
*** Error code 1
Stop in
Hi,
su password prompt is displayed to *stdout* instead of */dev/tty*.
# su user
$ su root -c date /tmp/date 21
(nothing displayed)
$ cat /tmp/date
Password:su: Sorry
$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd8.my.domain 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov
21 15:48:17 UTC 2009
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 07:57 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message cf9b1ee01001240759j2476cf3es2babd8b32a90f...@mail.gmail.com, Dan
N
aumov writes:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Fri, Jan
Hi,
Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
Hi,
su password prompt is displayed to *stdout* instead of */dev/tty*.
# su user
$ su root -c date /tmp/date 21
(nothing displayed)
$ cat /tmp/date
Password:su: Sorry
$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd8.my.domain 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov
21
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:57, glen.j.barber@ wrote:
Hi,
Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
Hi,
su password prompt is displayed to *stdout* instead of */dev/tty*.
# su user
$ su root -c date /tmp/date 21
(nothing displayed)
$ cat /tmp/date
Password:su: Sorry
$ uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd8.my.domain
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:48, jhell@ wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:57, glen.j.barber@ wrote:
Hi,
Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
Hi,
su password prompt is displayed to *stdout* instead of */dev/tty*.
# su user
$ su root -c date /tmp/date 21
(nothing displayed)
$ cat /tmp/date
Password:su: Sorry
$
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with
which I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots
at all ... I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards,
It's possible to get an adapter that plugs into
I am having similar em interface problems with some of my production
machines running older intel 2-port cards, since upgrading from 7.2-RELEASE
to 8.0-RELEASE. The problem is basically, everything works fine, but
periodically the interface hangs (tcpdump shows no frames). A reboot or an
ifconfig
On 1/24/10, Maciej Jan Broniarz gau...@gausus.net wrote:
Hi,
I am running a server with several jails. They were created using
ezjail. What is the best way, to allow jail internal admin to manage
ports/packages by himself?
By default ezjail shares ports tree between basejail and otherjails.
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is
available at http://green-pcs.co.uk/2009/01/28/tranquil-bbs2-those-pci-cards/
I have the card described later on the
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is
available at
52 matches
Mail list logo
