On 7/21/2010 11:39 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com
mailto:amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
Also if you have an applicable SATA controller, running the ahci module
with give you more speed. Only change one thing a time though.
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0: SiI 3124 SATA300 controller port 0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfbeffc00-0xfbeffc7f,0xfbef-0xfbef7fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci7
atapci1: SiI 3124 SATA300 controller port 0xac00-0xac0f
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:32:48AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 11:39 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com
mailto:amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
Also if you have an applicable SATA controller, running the ahci module
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0:SiI 3124 SATA300 controller port 0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfbeffc00-0xfbeffc7f,0xfbef-0xfbef7fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci7
atapci1:SiI
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:02:33AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0:SiI 3124 SATA300 controller port 0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
On 7/22/2010 3:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:02:33AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0:SiI 3124 SATA300 controller
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0:SiI 3124 SATA300 controller port 0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfbeffc00-0xfbeffc7f,0xfbef-0xfbef7fff
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0:SiI 3124 SATA300 controller port 0xdc00-0xdc0f
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0:SiI
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:03:05AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
Well, I don't have anything to support hotplug. All my stuff is internal.
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:15:41 -0400 Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 11:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote (something close to this):
First, create a new GUID Partition Table partition scheme on the HDD:
gpart create -s GPT ad0
Let's see how much space we have. This output will be used to
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:15:41 -0400 Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 11:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote (something close to this):
First, create a new GUID Partition Table partition scheme on the HDD:
gpart create -s GPT ad0
Let's see how much space we
Charles Sprickman sp...@bway.net writes:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:15:41 -0400 Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/21/2010 11:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote (something close to this):
First, create a new GUID Partition Table partition scheme on the HDD:
gpart create
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Spil Oss wrote:
Hi Sergey,
I'm dumbstruck!
Switching 'ip' to 'ip4' in both the divert rules fixed my problem.
Personally I think that should go into the UPDATING file as well. I
wouldn't have found it if you hadn't told me!
Many thanks,
Spil.
This
On 22/07/2010, at 12:35, Dan Langille wrote:
Why use glabel?
* So ZFS can find and use the correct HDD should the HDD device ever
get renumbered for whatever reason. e.g. /dev/da0 becomes /dev/da6
when you move it to another controller.
Why use partitions?
* Primarily: two HDD of
On 22/07/2010, at 13:59, Adam Vande More wrote:
To be clear, we are talking about data partitions, not the boot one.
Difficult for me to explain concisely, but basically it has to do with seek
time. A mis-aligned partition will almost always have an extra seek for
each standard seek you'd
On Jul 21, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I hope my terminology is correct
I have a ZFS array which uses raw devices. I'd rather it use glabel and
supply the GEOM devices to ZFS instead. In addition, I'll also partition the
HDD to avoid using the entire HDD: leave a little
22.07.2010 06:05, Dan Langille wrote:
Create a new partition within that scheme:
gpart add -b 34 -s SOMEVALUE -t freebsd-zfs ad0
Why '-b 34'? Randi pointed me to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table where it explains what
the first 33 LBA are used for. It's not for us to use here.
For a month ago every day become an portaudit alert, that the mdnsd is
still vulnerable. The fix is available since ~1 month
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/147007
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Picked up a couple of these powerhouse machines to be VirtualBox hosts.
24 core, 96G of RAM. Trying to put (amd64) both 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RC2
on it with no luck whatsoever so far. Any help provided would be greatly
appreciated, I'm chomping at the bit pretty hard to put this hardware to
use,
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:38 -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
Picked up a couple of these powerhouse machines to be VirtualBox hosts.
24 core, 96G of RAM. Trying to put (amd64) both 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RC2
on it with no luck whatsoever so far. Any help provided would be greatly
appreciated, I'm
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
[...]
I suppose I could boot via console and log it all... come to think of
it, I'll go give that a try to get more comprehensive output
Okay, here we go, output below my sig.
panic: Built bad topology -- oh, dear. That's a new one for me.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010, Sean Bruno wrote:
Funny you should mention this box. I've been arm wrestling with this
beastie for a couple of weeks and finally had some amount of success
today.
A couple of things:
1. Reduce your RAM to 64G (seriously)
2. Don't use the H200 Dell RAID
Thank you to all the helpful discussion. It's been very helpful and
educational. Based on the advice and suggestions, I'm going to adjust
my original plan as follows.
NOTE: glabel will not be used.
First, create a new GUID Partition Table partition scheme on the HDD:
gpart create -s GPT
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:36:11PM -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010, Sean Bruno wrote:
Funny you should mention this box. I've been arm wrestling with this
beastie for a couple of weeks and finally had some amount of success
today.
A couple of things:
1.
Hi, Mahlon--
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
Install worked great, though it appears I need to keep hyperthreading
(logical processors bios option) disabled for it to boot reliably.
Similar errors as before if I enable it.
I believe FreeBSD ships with MAXCPU set to 32 by
I do not think I can adjust the existing zpool on the fly. I think I
need to copy everything elsewhere (i.e the 2 empty drives). Then start
the new zpool from scratch.
You can, and you should (for educational purposes if not for fun :),
unless you wish to change raidz1 to raidz2. Replace,
On 7/22/2010 9:22 PM, Pawel Tyll wrote:
I do not think I can adjust the existing zpool on the fly. I think I
need to copy everything elsewhere (i.e the 2 empty drives). Then start
the new zpool from scratch.
You can, and you should (for educational purposes if not for fun :),
unless you
So... the smaller size won't mess things up...
If by smaller size you mean smaller size of existing
drives/partitions, then growing zpools by replacing smaller vdevs
with larger ones is supported and works. What isn't supported is
basically everything else:
- you can't change number of raid
On 23/07/2010, at 24:56, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
22.07.2010 06:05, Dan Langille wrote:
Create a new partition within that scheme:
gpart add -b 34 -s SOMEVALUE -t freebsd-zfs ad0
Why '-b 34'? Randi pointed me to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table where it explains what
33 matches
Mail list logo
