Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

2015-12-10 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 10/12/2015 05:38, Karl Denninger wrote: > Beadm allows you to set the "next boot" and works as expected. > > You can't select from the boot loader but you can certainly ping-pong > between a working and test environment easily (I do this all the time) Being able to easily switch between BEs

Re: Something in r291926 (and earlier) causes reboots during periodic daily (14 jails on system)

2015-12-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:15:10 -0600 Dustin Wenz wrote: > Are you by chance using the ARC patch from this PR? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594 No (despite the fact that I would like to have it hit the tree). > Do you have a

[Bug 183817] [patch] [mac] [panic] kernel compiled with options INVARIANTS and MAC_PORTACL panices if loader loads mac_portacl.ko too

2015-12-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183817 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||mfc-stable9?,

[Bug 183817] [patch] [mac] [panic] kernel compiled with options INVARIANTS and MAC_PORTACL panices if loader loads mac_portacl.ko too

2015-12-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183817 eu...@grosbein.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org

Re: Something in r291926 (and earlier) causes reboots during periodic daily (14 jails on system)

2015-12-10 Thread Karl Denninger
On 12/10/2015 05:03, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:15:10 -0600 > Dustin Wenz wrote: > >> Are you by chance using the ARC patch from this PR? >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594 > No (despite the fact that I would like to

Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

2015-12-10 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Michael B. Eichorn wrote: > > I sorry, but I really don't get your point, PCBSD has shown a great > reason why zfs on root and on laptops/desktops is a good idea... boot > It has? As this is FreeBSD not PCBSD I must have missed that one... > environments. They have pretty much figured out

Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

2015-12-10 Thread Karl Denninger
On 12/10/2015 02:40, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 10/12/2015 05:38, Karl Denninger wrote: >> Beadm allows you to set the "next boot" and works as expected. >> >> You can't select from the boot loader but you can certainly ping-pong >> between a working and test environment easily (I do this all the

Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

2015-12-10 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I could be recalling wrongly but I'm pretty sure a number of emails have > been seen on @freebsd.org lists that say, "don't use zfs on single > spindle machines" We do ZFS on single-spindle/SSD devices regularly. No problems as of now. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

[Bug 183817] [patch] [mac] [panic] kernel compiled with options INVARIANTS and MAC_PORTACL panices if loader loads mac_portacl.ko too

2015-12-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183817 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||crash -- You

Re: Something in r291926 (and earlier) causes reboots during periodic daily (14 jails on system)

2015-12-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:29:03 -0600 Karl Denninger wrote: > On 12/10/2015 05:03, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:15:10 -0600 > > Dustin Wenz wrote: > > > >> Are you by chance using the ARC patch from this PR? > >> > >>

Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

2015-12-10 Thread Michael B. Eichorn
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 14:16 +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Michael B. Eichorn wrote: > > > > I sorry, but I really don't get your point, PCBSD has shown a great > > reason why zfs on root and on laptops/desktops is a good idea... > > boot > >   > > It has?  As this is FreeBSD not PCBSD I

Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

2015-12-10 Thread Michael Jung
On 2015-12-10 09:45, Michael B. Eichorn wrote: On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 14:16 +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote: Michael B. Eichorn wrote: > > I sorry, but I really don't get your point, PCBSD has shown a great > reason why zfs on root and on laptops/desktops is a good idea... > boot >   It has?  As

Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

2015-12-10 Thread Fabian Keil
Michelle Sullivan wrote: > ZFS has it's place, it is very good at some things, it brings features > that people need. > ZFS does not work (is not stable) on i386 without recompiling the > kernel, but it is presented as an installation option. > ZFS is compiled in by default