Re: Build of RELENG_5 fails in libmagic

On Saturday 13 Nov 2004 21:01, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 08:17:31PM +, Mark Dixon wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build 5-STABLE, I have cvsuped the latest source, cleared out /usr/obj and I still get this problem. Any idea what could be causing it? Check that your

subscription to 5.3 stable mailing list, thanks

___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IPv6 bridge + gif tunnel

Hi, About the combination between bridge function and gif tunnel function, I have tested it on FreeBSD 4.10, but not succeeded. FreeBSD 4.10 box shows the message when we typed 'sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=rl0,gif0', gif0 is not an ethernet, continue interface gif0

Re: Build of RELENG_5 fails in libmagic

On 130104, 19:37, Mark Dixon wrote: I'm trying to build 5-STABLE, I have cvsuped the latest source, cleared out /usr/obj and I still get this problem. Any idea what could be causing it? /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc *** Error code 1 I had the same exact problem while

Can't compile 5.3-STABLE from 5.3-RC2

Hi, I wanted to Update my System that runs FreeBSD 5.3-RC2 to the final 5.3-Level. However, compile reproducible stops in libstdc++, claiming a missing unwind.h. I already removed /usr/src and re-cvsupped it and also searched the /usr/src/UPDATING and the CURRENT- and STABLE-Lists for such

new threads problem? pthread_cond_timedwait ?

My hard drive failed right around FreeBSD-5.3, so I got to do a fresh install of 5.3-RC1 followed by a cvsup to -STABLE (yesterday). Due to my nvidia video driver, I still have libmap.conf forcing libpthread to use libc_r. When compiling audio/xmms-imms, I get the following error, and I don't

Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!

I'm trying to use sed under FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE in a new 'netqmail' port I am currently working on. I want to replace a bunch of digits (in plain English: a decimal number) in a text file at the beginning of a line. Here is how the original file looks before I do anything (this file is part of

Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!

On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 18:39, Zoltan Frombach wrote: match anything! After spending like an hour investigating this, I realized that the + after my bracket expression ( I'm talking about this part here: Normal. According to the sed man page, the regexp syntax that is used by sed is

Re: Can't compile 5.3-STABLE from 5.3-RC2

On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:31:36PM +0100, Ralf Folkerts wrote: Hi, I wanted to Update my System that runs FreeBSD 5.3-RC2 to the final 5.3-Level. However, compile reproducible stops in libstdc++, claiming a missing unwind.h. I already removed /usr/src and re-cvsupped it and also

Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!

You are right. My mistake. This indeed works: sed -E -e s/^[0-9]+/199/ conf-split conf-split.new Thanks for clearing this up. Zoltan On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 18:39, Zoltan Frombach wrote: match anything! After spending like an hour investigating this, I realized that the + after my bracket

Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!

use -E ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

New 5.x packages uploaded

I've uploaded new packages for 5.3-stable; they'll make their way onto the ftp mirrors over the next day or so. Included are the new versions of GNOME and KDE, among others. Kris pgpwhOvbU0XR1.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!

Zoltan Frombach wrote: You are right. My mistake. This indeed works: sed -E -e s/^[0-9]+/199/ conf-split conf-split.new Thanks for clearing this up. For what it's worth, there is another way to write this regexp without using the -E flag. Since x+ == xx*, you can write it:

Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!

Thanks. I will not use the -E flag then. Zoltan Zoltan Frombach wrote: You are right. My mistake. This indeed works: sed -E -e s/^[0-9]+/199/ conf-split conf-split.new Thanks for clearing this up. For what it's worth, there is another way to write this regexp without using the -E flag. Since x+

Re: New 5.x packages uploaded

Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've uploaded new packages for 5.3-stable; they'll make their way onto the ftp mirrors over the next day or so. Included are the new versions of GNOME and KDE, among others. BTW, are we getting long-standing security issues in ports fixed, for instance

Re: New 5.x packages uploaded

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:06:07AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've uploaded new packages for 5.3-stable; they'll make their way onto the ftp mirrors over the next day or so. Included are the new versions of GNOME and KDE, among others. BTW,

gvinum setstate missing?

I'm in the uncomfortable position of needing to setstate down a gvinum drive. I can't seem to effect this as the gvinum command doesn't understand setstate (even though it proclaims that it does in gvinum help). Is there a way of making this so? ___

SIIG cards and puc

I've tried to get one of the 20x family 16C650 64-byte buffer SIIG cards to work. It does not work out of the box. I had to add 0x4001 into the flags in pucdata.c for my card and options COM_MULTIPORT into the kernel config. It's still limited to 115200 baud, but all I was interested is 9600

panic: APIC: Previous IPI is stuck

At work, I've just taken an old cast off NT server and used it as a replacement for an equally elderly low end PC which performs an important monitoring task. I took the opportunity to upgrade to 5.3 (5.3-RC2 now, yesterday's 5.3-STABLE when I get to work again) rather than stay on 4.10-RELEASE.

gvinum again?

I'm looking at gstat while fsck'ing a gvinum partition. The trouble I'm seeing is that I don't see activity on the second disk. Now... I'm using fsck -n ... just checking things ... so there's no writes, but does gvinum not (yet) load balance on reads?

Re: msdosfs - support for large disks?

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:27:08 +0200 Saulius Menkevicius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It support those, you just have to include options MSDOSFS_LARGE in you kernel config file. OK, I found that (shouldn't this be documented in the NOTES file, even if it is an experimental patch?), and made a new

Re: gvinum again?

On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 00:36 -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: I'm looking at gstat while fsck'ing a gvinum partition. The trouble I'm seeing is that I don't see activity on the second disk. Now... I'm using fsck -n ... just checking things ... so there's no writes, but does gvinum not (yet)

Re: gvinum again?

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:26:54 -0500, Paul Mather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your observation is correct: it doesn't (yet) load balance across plexes of mirrored volumes; geom_mirror (gmirror) does, though (and offers various load-balancing options). Is this something planned for the near future?