Rob wrote:
In this case there's only one harddisk and when I do
# atacontrol mode 0 UDMA66 BIOSPIO
I get lots of such lines:
ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying
request) LBA=20185375
ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying
request) LBA=20185375
ad0: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:47:27PM -0800, Jonathan A. Dama wrote:
FreeBSD/amd64 is not in my opinion not actually a stable tier 1 quality
release under these configurations, too many problems remain--especially
in regards to ia32 emulation.
It is not required for a Tier-1 platform to have
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. A geometry translation for pc98 is NOT enough.
Currently, it works only under 4.3GB disk.
Wrong, ATA mk3 does solve the problem but using the current geomtry
set in the drives by the BIOS. However the code missed
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hi!
I have a table with ethernet (MAC) addresses matching IPs. It is
used to build dhcp config file. But regardless of that any user can
assign his neighbour ips while that pc is turned off and use it to
access internet. The local ips are 192.168. and are behind natd.
I am
Hello,
This is a 5.3-RELEASE-p5/amd64 on IBM X236 (EM64T) with 2GB RAM
and a LSI 21320 rmpt(4) running at 160MB/s with a hardware
RAID (da0, da1). HTT is enabled. When I run benchmark/blogbench on
/da0/ I can *reproduce* this panic again and again:
(I'm getting a dump now, let me fsck first)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:35:55 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote
In the last episode (Feb 14), Kris Kennaway said:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:30:42AM +, John wrote:
Is there a way of seeing *what* program/process is eating swap.
There are loads of ways of seeing that it is being eaten, but so
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:35:55 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote
In the last episode (Feb 14), Kris Kennaway said:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:30:42AM +, John wrote:
Is there a way of seeing *what* program/process is eating swap.
There are loads of ways of seeing that it is being eaten, but so
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
help us track down in bug reports what code the user has, especially
John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your input so far. Here is the output from top:
last pid: 59737; load averages: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00up 1+18:32:57
15:16:36
82 processes: 1 running, 79 sleeping, 2 zombie
CPU states: 0.4% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.0% interrupt,
Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
help us track down in bug reports what code the user
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the exact UTC date for the build would be good. That would
help us
Thanks for this - the oddity is we have two identical machines and on one the
problem occurred we then moved the application over to the other machines that
had been working fine and it then exhibited the same symptoms - hence the
query about the broadcom controller. I am hoping to so some
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:41, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
publishing the
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:41, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 17:29, Nate Lawson wrote:
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Tuesday, 15. February 2005 07:28, Nate Lawson wrote:
Are there any tags for these? That may be too heavyweight but at least
Thanks Jonathan for this, can I ask the unmentionalble (which Linux
implementation did you pick?).
I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to stable
we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
databases (mySQL) one is reasonably heavily
Alan Jay wrote:
Thanks Jonathan for this, can I ask the unmentionalble (which Linux
implementation did you pick?).
I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to stable
we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
databases (mySQL) one is
The 4GB problems with 5.3-RELEASE are a well known problem and affect
for i386 and amd64. It's pretty much fixed in the 5.3-STABLE stream,
but there are a few edge cases that I still need to fix which prevent me
from feeling good about turning it into a 5.3-R errata fix. It'll
definitely
[ PLEASE don't top post - it losses context, and this is a Unix mailing list]
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:53:24PM -, Alan Jay wrote:
I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to stable
we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
-Original Message-
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:53:24PM -, Alan Jay wrote:
I had major problems installing with more than 4Gb but once I moved to
stable
we seemed to have a stable platform when doing basic stuff - we have two
databases (mySQL) one is reasonably heavily used and
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:18:47PM -0600, Chris Dillon wrote:
(i did not undestrand, how i somebody can match mac and ip with
static arp except that he actually get the physical NIC from
somebody's computer).
Because you can change the MAC address of your NIC to match someone
else's very
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Tristan wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:08:26 +1030
Tristan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
Does this limitation still exist (from 5.3
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:11:31PM +, John wrote:
Another data point - I see this in my nightly security logs:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: ad0s1f, blkno: 28190, size: 4096
maybe there's a bad block on the swap partition??
That's what this usually means, yes.
Kris
I'm having some problem with interface bonding on 5.3 stable.
I used this before on 4.x without problems. I can't run 5.3-R
becuase my SysKonnect nics panic the box when i load the drivers. (5.3-Stable
fixed this).
First off this is how i'm bonding nics.
kldload ng_ether
# create ngeth0
Hello,
This is a 5.3-RELEASE-p5/amd64 on IBM X236 (EM64T) with 2GB RAM
and a LSI 21320 rmpt(4) running at 160MB/s with a hardware
RAID (da0, da1). HTT is enabled. When I run benchmark/blogbench on
/da0/ I can *reproduce* this panic again and again:
(I'm getting a dump now, let me fsck first)
Steve Hodgson wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2005 17:37, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:22:05PM +, Steve Hodgson wrote:
I'm getting the following error on a RELENG_5_3 box when trying to
compile the RELENG_5 sources. I've been cvsupping now for about a week
and continuing to get
I'm talking hour/min./second, thanks.
What it sounds like you really want is the CVS revision ID for every
file in the snapshot so that when someone reports a bug that you think
you might have fixed already, you can just point them to the correct
revision. Haven't you learned that
From: Takahashi Yoshihiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UPDATE: ATA mkIII first official patches - please test!
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:08:05 +0900 (JST)
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. A geometry translation for pc98 is NOT enough.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:58:03 +0300, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a table with ethernet (MAC) addresses matching IPs. It is
used to build dhcp config file. But regardless of that any user can
assign his neighbour ips while that pc is turned off and use it to
access
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 14:02, Tuure Laurinolli wrote:
Steve Hodgson wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2005 17:37, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:22:05PM +, Steve Hodgson wrote:
I'm getting the following error on a RELENG_5_3 box when trying to
compile the RELENG_5
Steve Hodgson wrote:
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 14:02, Tuure Laurinolli wrote:
Steve Hodgson wrote:
On Sunday 16 January 2005 17:37, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:22:05PM +, Steve Hodgson wrote:
I'm getting the following error on a RELENG_5_3 box when trying to
compile the
Hi,
I was just wondering whether it is posibl to build say a 4.11 kernel
on a 5.3 system - I'd like to have only one machine here on which I
maintain all the sources and buidl what i need, then I think you can
mount the /usr/obj file system and /usr/src and run the install stages
on other
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:28:33PM +, Alex Burke wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering whether it is posibl to build say a 4.11 kernel
on a 5.3 system - I'd like to have only one machine here on which I
maintain all the sources and buidl what i need, then I think you can
mount the /usr/obj
Sorry to butt in on your thread, but it seems relevant. I am having
problems with gvinum under 5-STABLE and a RAID 0 array of two disks.
The array works perfectly until reboot. Then, when the machine comes
back up the plexes are marked as stale. Issuing these commands fixes
the problem until
AFAIK, one of the main points of that logo competition is
to do away with anything that could be interpreted in an
religious way.
this is sick. should it happen, i'll take up the penguin.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
Sorry to butt in on your thread, but it seems relevant. I am having
problems with gvinum under 5-STABLE and a RAID 0 array of two disks.
The array works perfectly until reboot. Then, when the machine comes
back up the plexes are marked as stale. Issuing these commands
Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:58:03 +0300, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
I have a table with ethernet (MAC) addresses matching IPs. It is
used to build dhcp config file. But regardless of that any user can
assign his neighbour ips while that pc is turned
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:46:07 -1000, Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, one of the main points of that logo competition is
to do away with anything that could be interpreted in an
religious way.
this is sick. should it happen, i'll take up the penguin.
Wow, if that's your take on
I was just wondering whether it is posibl to build say a 4.11 kernel
on a 5.3 system - I'd like to have only one machine here on which I
maintain all the sources and buidl what i need, then I think you can
mount the /usr/obj file system and /usr/src and run the install stages
on other
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:29:13AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
The snapshots on snapshots.[jp|se].freebsd.org are date-suffixed (however,
those servers don't build snaps for all platforms).
I'm talking hour/min./second, thanks.
Both checkout code as of 00:00:00 GMT on the date the snapshot
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following is the result when use SATA 200GB disk on pc98. It is
clearly that recognizing a geometry fails.
atapci0: SiI 3114 SATA150 controller port
I got an io error
xf86EnableIO: Fatal to open /dev/io for extended I/O
when running Xorg -configure.
Has this snapshot been fixed this problem?
Eitarou
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
41 matches
Mail list logo
