Kent Stewart wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 18:20, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:59:53 +0200
martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See
On Sat, 2006-Sep-23 09:09:38 +0200, martinko wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 18:20, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:59:53 +0200
martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
Please submit a full bug report,
with
Hello!
I've noticed a strange interdependency between FS mount options (RELENG_6
as of 20-Aug). I'm using rw,sync options in my /etc/fstab for the root
partition. W/o NFS export of it, 'mount' output looks good:
/dev/ad0s4a on / (ufs, local, synchronous)
However, when I export this
Hi,
I just experienced a panic after playing around with bluetooth. After a
fresh boot I decided to try and unload the ng_ubt module and noted all
the dependencies. So I tried to unload all of them in turn a few times.
Some seemed to unload but kldstat showed many of them still and it seemed
like
On 23 Sep 21:56, Callum Gibson wrote:
}like I wasn't going to be able to unload them all. Then I pressed
}the wlan/bluetooth toggle button and had the panic.
}
}I'm synced to 6_RELENG as at 20th September. Apparently (null) below
}is where ubt should be.
I neglected to mention I'm running
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:19:03 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just comitted a fix to syscalls.master and regenerated the remaining
system call files, which should correct the auditctl: Invalid Argument
error being returned by
I have a Dell XPS 700 Pentium D 3.6 Dual Core with 2 gigs RAM, 2 250 GB
SATA drives, a TSST Corp TS-H553A DVD burner and a Phillips DROM 6316
DVD-ROM.
The system sees the hard drives but not the DVD drives. I have device
atapicam compiled in the kernel.
What can I do to enable the drives?
Hi Sam!
Sam I do not understand what bad connectivity means.
I'm not a native speaker so I've apparently used a wrong term, I apologize
for the confusion. Instead I should've probably said low signal strength.
Sam If you provide
Sam information like the mac+phy revs for the card,
On Sep 3, 2006, at 14:13 , Johan Ström wrote:
Hi
I'm about to get a new server... In this case what I'm looking at
is a Gigabyte GA-K8NSC mobo with nForce3 250Gb chipset, and a AMD
64 3200+ Venice S939.
Does anyone have any experience with FreeBSD (6.1) and this mobo/
chipset? Does the
Hi,
I upgraded my FreeBSD from 6.1-RELEASE-p6
on my HP Compaq nx8220 to 6.2-PRERELEASE
as of two days ago.
With 6.1-RELEASE-p6 and xorg from 6.1-RELEASE
installed, I just activated glx and dri in xorg.conf
which worked without bigger problems, but after
upgrading to 6.2-PRERELEASE the screen
Hi,
I have noticed that top reports strange values for CPU utilization. The
problem is that while it reports this for overall utilization...
CPU states: 40.8% user, 0.0% nice, 3.7% system, 4.5% interrupt, 50.9% idle
...it doesn't show a single process that would have over 1% of WCPU or CPU!
On Sat, 2006-Sep-23 21:56:45 +1000, Callum Gibson wrote:
I just experienced a panic after playing around with bluetooth. After a
fresh boot I decided to try and unload the ng_ubt module and noted all
the dependencies. So I tried to unload all of them in turn a few times.
Some seemed to unload but
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:16:23 +0200
Václav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...it doesn't show a single process that would have over 1% of WCPU or CPU!
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU
COMMAND
My guess is that you're seeing weighted CPU time and want
Hi,
Scott Long wrote:
I can't see any mention of virtual address alignment in the
bus_dma man
page. Can it take care of virtual address alignment? If so, how?
busdma makes no guarantees on virtual addresses.
Thanks for the confirmation. I assume this is also true for
Stefan Esser wrote:
I've been the co-author of the ncr SCSI driver, on which sym is based
(though not that particular code fragment). Since I know the structure
and principals of the driver (and since I have and know the docs up to
the 53c875, possibly also the 53c895), I'd probably be in a
Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez wrote, On 23.9.2006 23:42:
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:16:23 +0200
Václav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...it doesn't show a single process that would have over 1% of WCPU or CPU!
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU
COMMAND
My
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:16:23 +0200, Václav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed that top reports strange values for CPU utilization. The
problem is that while it reports this for overall utilization...
CPU states: 40.8% user, 0.0% nice, 3.7% system, 4.5% interrupt, 50.9%
On Sunday 24 September 2006 01:50, Ronald Klop wrote:
I see the same and it is always with threaded applications (libpthread).
If you use libthr (see libmap.conf) it shows a lot better.
I also found that vlc performs better with libthr than with libpthread; with
libthr I am able to view a
Dmitry Karasik wrote:
Hi Sam!
Sam I do not understand what bad connectivity means.
I'm not a native speaker so I've apparently used a wrong term, I apologize
for the confusion. Instead I should've probably said low signal strength.
Sam If you provide
Sam information like the
martinko wrote:
Kent Stewart wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 18:20, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:59:53 +0200
martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See
20 matches
Mail list logo
