Attached is a simple user program that will immediately cause pretty much
all of the network drivers (at least the ones I own) to stop working and
get watchdog timeouts.
WARNING: This program will kill the network on your 6.x server. Do not run
this on a production machine unless you are on
Attached is a simple user program that will immediately cause pretty much
all of the network drivers (at least the ones I own) to stop working and
get watchdog timeouts.
Oh, one more thing - I've only tried this on uni-processor machines. The
only MP machine that I have here is a
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 amd64
/usr/bin/gcc -O1 -pipe -march=nocona -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE
-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl
-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto
-I/files3/build/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto -DOPENSSL_THREADS
-DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:27:41AM -0700, David G Lawrence wrote:
Attached is a simple user program that will immediately cause pretty much
all of the network drivers (at least the ones I own) to stop working and
get watchdog timeouts.
WARNING: This program will kill the network on your
Christer Solskogen wrote:
/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c
/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.c:81:
error: `DH_R_MODULUS_TOO_LARGE' undeclared here (not in a function)
Looks like you don't have an updated dh.h yet.
Will a fix for NFS/TCP (nfs_socket.c rev 1.138) be ever committed to stable?
Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
On Monday 08 May 2006 19:41, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:54:58PM +0200, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
I have an NSF server and several clients which write large text
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:27:41AM -0700, David G Lawrence wrote:
Attached is a simple user program that will immediately cause pretty much
all of the network drivers (at least the ones I own) to stop working and
get watchdog timeouts.
WARNING: This program will kill the network on
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 01:16:47AM -0700, David G Lawrence wrote:
Is this a UP machine or MP machine?
Dualcore AMD64.
sysadm:~sysctl hw.ncpu
hw.ncpu: 2
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, September 29, 2006 10:09, Colin Percival wrote:
Christer Solskogen wrote:
/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.
c
/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/dh/dh_err.
c:81:
error: `DH_R_MODULUS_TOO_LARGE' undeclared here (not in
Attached is a simple user program that will immediately cause pretty much
all of the network drivers (at least the ones I own) to stop working and
get watchdog timeouts.
I am runnign this on a single processor machine with an SMP kernel and
it does not have any effect. I dont tink I have
Attached is a simple user program that will immediately cause pretty much
all of the network drivers (at least the ones I own) to stop working and
get watchdog timeouts.
I am runnign this on a single processor machine with an SMP kernel and
it does not have any effect. I dont tink I
Do you have any history of seeing the watchdog timeout problem on your
machine?
On this machine no - but it's the only one running em0. On other
machines running bge0 then, yes, I see it a lot. But those are all
SMP machines, aside from one. On that one I am currently building
the latest
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 10:19:22PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Dear colleagues,
this is very preliminar report, I'll try to test more thoroughly tomorrow...
after detaching one disk from gmirror (four gmirror tuples for each bsd
partition) I encounter panic:
panic:
Do you have any history of seeing the watchdog timeout problem on your
machine?
O.K., I just finished compiing up a uniprocessor kenel for the machine
on which I had been seeing bge0 timeouts, and the lopppoll.c code
has no effect there. The kerenl I am running is the latest STABLE from
a
Do you have any history of seeing the watchdog timeout problem on your
machine?
On this machine no - but it's the only one running em0. On other
machines running bge0 then, yes, I see it a lot. But those are all
SMP machines, aside from one. On that one I am currently building
the
Christer Solskogen wrote:
I've tried norway's mirror (my default), the danish, the swedish mirror
and the mirror in holland. No change.
Just to be sure I also deletet src/crypto before I tried the different
mirrors.
Exactly what command did you run to try to compile this?
Colin Percival
Hi Mark!
I've got the Netgear WG511T and it works pretty well. Sometimes it does
lock up and become unusable after using Kismet or dstumbler (can't
remember which one), but my old 550MHz laptop runs one of the 6.0
BETAs...so things may have improved in 6.1 or the upcoming 6.2 if it is
a
Hey guys,
I'm not really on the ball with reading the lists now-a-days, and so
I've not idea whether this has been discussed already.
On my laptop running 6.2-PRERELEASE the drives always mount dirty, which
suggests that they are not being shutdown clean; however the machine
always syncs the
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 13:17 -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
FreeBSD Update is public; if you are running a system which identifies
itself as i386 running FreeBSD 6.2-BETA1, FreeBSD Update should be able
to fetch the updates right now.
If it doesn't, something is broken, and I'd like to hear
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm not really on the ball with reading the lists now-a-days, and so
I've not idea whether this has been discussed already.
On my laptop running 6.2-PRERELEASE the drives always mount dirty, which
suggests that
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On my laptop running 6.2-PRERELEASE the drives always mount dirty, which
suggests that they are not being shutdown clean; however the machine
always syncs the disks and switches itself off after a 'shutdown -p
now', and so I'm
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:30:05 -0700
Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christer Solskogen wrote:
I've tried norway's mirror (my default), the danish, the swedish
mirror and the mirror in holland. No change.
Just to be sure I also deletet src/crypto before I tried the
different
Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:30:05 -0700
Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean using different mirrors? I'm using a supfile for that. But
if you mean building I used 'make buildkernel buildworld'
But doing a make includes did the trick. It compiles as it
Christer Solskogen wrote:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 amd64
/usr/bin/gcc -O1 -pipe -march=nocona -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE
-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl
-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto
-I/files3/build/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:27:55 -0700
security [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:30:05 -0700
Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean using different mirrors? I'm using a supfile for that.
But if you mean building I used 'make
Albert Chin wrote:
I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI
bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay
(though the card really looks like a PERC4/DS) and just ran some
bonnie++ tests on a RAID 1 array between two U320 drives for the
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 11:25 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
The goal is to have a USB flash drive mounted via automounter in a way
that it auto-umounts after a while so I don't crash the system by
pluggin it out wile mounted. My amd.map looks like this:
/defaults
I don't know if mohan already committed it, so perhaps he can comment.
Kris
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
Will a fix for NFS/TCP (nfs_socket.c rev 1.138) be ever committed to stable?
Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
On Monday 08 May 2006 19:41, Kris Kennaway
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 16:37 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
and my luck has it such that i've not had a lockup since i added that
extra debugging code into the kernel :-) or :-( depending on your
view...
Heisenbugs are great! :)
Before I classified this as a Heisenbug I'd switch from
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 06:01:14PM +0200, Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:27:55 -0700
security [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:30:05 -0700
Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean using different mirrors?
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:40:36PM +0200, Uwe Doering wrote:
[...]
The same happened on my workstation, which runs 4.11. The cause of this
problem is that the openssl sources under '/usr/src' apparently use some
include files installed under '/usr/include/openssl' instead of those in
the
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:40:36PM +0200, Uwe Doering wrote:
[...]
The same happened on my workstation, which runs 4.11. The cause of this
problem is that the openssl sources under '/usr/src' apparently use some
include files installed under '/usr/include/openssl'
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:34:29PM +0200, Uwe Doering wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:40:36PM +0200, Uwe Doering wrote:
[...]
The same happened on my workstation, which runs 4.11. The cause of this
problem is that the openssl sources under '/usr/src' apparently use
On 9/29/06, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are very speedy cards once you put them into their intended
configuration. With some decent SCSI disks and a PCI-X bus, it
performs quite well. However, I'm actually kinda surprised that the
card works at all in your 5V slot.
I have a
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:34:29PM +0200, Uwe Doering wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:40:36PM +0200, Uwe Doering wrote:
[...]
The same happened on my workstation, which runs 4.11. The cause of this
problem is that the openssl sources under
I believe it uses emulex card. I found very good support for qlogic
with isp(4) device, but what about emulex? Is there any chance it will
work on FreeBSD?
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:33:14AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI
bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay
(though the card really looks like a PERC4/DS) and just ran some
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:54:22PM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote..
I believe it uses emulex card. I found very good support for qlogic
with isp(4) device, but what about emulex? Is there any chance it will
work on FreeBSD?
No, there is no Emulex FC driver for FreeBSD. I don't know about the
How sad :~
But thank you for the quick reply. I hope bsdstats initiative may help
somehow this kind of problem.
No, there is no Emulex FC driver for FreeBSD. I don't know about the
current situation, but Emulex used to only supply docs under NDA.
Qlogic was/is much easier in this respect.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 06:01:25PM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote..
How sad :~
But thank you for the quick reply. I hope bsdstats initiative may help
somehow this kind of problem.
All this said, I think you will find a Qlogic FC HBA will happily talk to
your EMC CX!
No, there is no Emulex FC
I've been experiencing this problem too, along with my USB keyboard
acting 'wonky' (stuttering from time to time). For me at least it seems
to be tied to CPU usage, meaning it's probably related to the taskqueue
or maybe even the scheduler. I can also reproduce the problem on a much
bigger scale
Doesn't seem to have any effect for me (other than high sys% times).
qemu is really good at provoking my em0 to timeout.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:27:41AM -0700, David G Lawrence wrote:
Attached is a simple user program that will immediately cause pretty much
all of the network drivers (at
On Friday 29 September 2006 06:37, Pete French wrote:
Attached is a simple user program that will immediately cause pretty
much
all of the network drivers (at least the ones I own) to stop working and
get watchdog timeouts.
I am runnign this on a single processor machine with an SMP
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:21:55PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
Doesn't seem to have any effect for me (other than high sys% times).
qemu is really good at provoking my em0 to timeout.
What might be useful for someone who can provoke this, is to configure
your kernel with MUTEX_PROFILING, then do
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:37:40PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
What might be useful for someone who can provoke this, is to configure
your kernel with MUTEX_PROFILING, then do the following:
snip
This will help to show whether something is causing Giant starvation.
I'm currently building a
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:21:56PM +0200, Uwe Doering wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
It doesn't matter. What you suggest is not the correct way.
Perhaps the buildworld is broken, but that's a separate issue.
My understanding so far is that the files under
'/usr/include' don't get touched
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:15:05PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI
bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay
(though the card really looks like a PERC4/DS) and just ran some
bonnie++ tests on a
FYI, I have just completed the merge of the OpenBSM 1.0 alpha 12 release to
RELENG_6. This is very likely the version of OpenBSM that will ship in
6.2-RELEASE. Most of the changes are bug fixes based on the feedback from
users (thanks!), but there are a couple of minor features. The four
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:37:40PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
and provide access to that file.
This will help to show whether something is causing Giant starvation.
http://www.gank.org/freebsd/stats.out
That's after about 25 seconds of the em0 interface being unable to
receive because of an
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:48:42PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/usb_fastintr_RELENG_6.diff
At first glance it appeared to work, but I'm about to do some more
testing since I just discovered that I have to kldload something
(anything) first in order to reproduce the
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:19:04PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:48:42PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/usb_fastintr_RELENG_6.diff
At first glance it appeared to work, but I'm about to do some more
testing since I just discovered that I
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:03:29PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:37:40PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
and provide access to that file.
This will help to show whether something is causing Giant starvation.
http://www.gank.org/freebsd/stats.out
That's after about
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:34:39PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:19:04PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:48:42PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/usb_fastintr_RELENG_6.diff
At first glance it appeared to work, but
In the last episode (Sep 29), Albert Chin said:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:15:05PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
I have an Intel S875PWP1 motherboard with a Pentium4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCI
bus is 33Mhz, 32-bit. I recently purchased an LSI 320-2/128MB on eBay
(though the card really looks like a
Any suggestions on this? The card in question one supplied by
Toshiba in their laptops.
ath0: Atheros 5424 irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3
ath0: 0x1 bytes of rid 0x10 res 3 failed (0, 0x).
ath0: cannot map register space
device_attach: ath0 attach returned 6
From lsci -v
03:00.0
Or LSI-Logic.
On 9/29/06, Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 06:01:25PM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote..
How sad :~
But thank you for the quick reply. I hope bsdstats initiative may help
somehow this kind of problem.
All this said, I think you will find a Qlogic FC
56 matches
Mail list logo
