Michal Mertl wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:14:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
All,
I'm seeing some patterns here with all of the network driver problem
reports, but I need more information to help narrow it down further.
I ask all of you who are having
On Friday 06 October 2006 07:57, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:40:14 +0200
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now my question what can I do ? Are there any kind of technics to
_downgrad_ a STABLE ?
Hi Albert,
this was discussed in -questions@ on September 27th.
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:01:07AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:30 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
The network load was minimal at the time. I had everyone log out and
close mail etc.
What were the symptoms of locked system ? Could you log in on
console, or
do
Brent Casavant wrote:
Not with FreeBSD in particular. However, from time to time I've
run across a piece of software that makes bad assumptions about
deleting various input or output files. If run as root, the
program/library might accidentally delete a character special
device such as
...
So what do I buy to replace this thing? Well, looking at the serial
hardware claimed supported, I seem to have a problem finding anything I can
actually purchase! I don't need real high performance - a 16550 based
multiport card is fine. I also don't want a $1500 solution - this isn't
Hi,
FreeBSD has been running rock solid on the older i386/HS20's, but the newer ones
with amd64 configuration keeps panicing, and I can't quite figure out why.
Help tracking this issue down, is greatly appreciated.
The panics happen randomly, average once every 2 days, sometimes just
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:17:33PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:14:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
All,
I'm seeing some patterns here with all of the network driver problem
reports, but I need more information to help narrow
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:13:15PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
It's definetely a regression from 4.11-STABLE that runs fine on
this system with ACPI fully enabled
Hmm, I was wrong about 4.11 using ACPI - it does not use it here
really, it uses good old APM.
It would be interesting
All,
I'm seeing some patterns here with all of the network driver problem
reports, but I need more information to help narrow it down further.
I ask all of you who are having problems to take a minute to fill
out this survey and return it to Kris Kennaway (on cc:) and myself.
Thanks.
1. Are
Bob Johnson wrote:
I have used USB-to-serial converters with no problem. All the control
signals (at least the ones my applications need) seem to work
correctly.
I have one with a Prolific PL-2303 chipset:
ucom0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 5
It works
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:04:41PM -0400, Bob Johnson wrote:
I have used USB-to-serial converters with no problem. All the control
signals (at least the ones my applications need) seem to work
correctly. I don't remember any brands or models off hand, I bought
what was cheap as I needed them
Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 05/10/2006 at 22:34 wrote:
Based on successful testing on a machine with shared em interrupt, the
following patch should work around the problem *in that case*.
[...]
Please let Scott and I know whether or not this patch works for you
(in addition to the
The FTDI devices keep the device descriptors etc. in an EEPROM, so my
approach to the 'which port is which' problem was to change the textual
part of the descriptor - usbdevs -d then immediately tells you what is
going on. The EEPROM is writable over the USB connection - I have a
program to
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:04:41PM -0400, Bob Johnson wrote:
I have used USB-to-serial converters with no problem. All the control
signals (at least the ones my applications need) seem to work
correctly. I don't remember any brands or models off
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:33:13AM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
On 2006-10-05, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:09:56PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 04:04:47PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
Any ideas how I might be able to get this card recognized, or better, to
function? ;-)
Oct 6 10:17:37 toshi kernel: pccard0: unknown card
(manufacturer=0x, product=0x, function_type=2)
at function 0
Oct 6 10:17:37 toshi kernel: pccard0:CIS info: Bluetooth
Hi,
for information, I tested the latest patch from bz@ :
http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/20061005-01-carp-v6-scope-ipfw.diff
and carp with IPv6 is working fine again !
More information in the PR (kern/98622)
thanks a lot
--
Philippe Pegon
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
If memory serves
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:03:11AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Brent Casavant wrote:
Not with FreeBSD in particular. However, from time to time I've
run across a piece of software that makes bad assumptions about
deleting various input or output files. If run as root, the
program/library
Roland Smith wrote:
The command 'devfs rule -s 2 apply 100' should fix it, I think.
?
If I read devfs(8) correctly, this should apply rule 100 of ruleset 2.
Since I have no rulesets or rules, it doesn't work. :)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:10:37AM -0400, Matt Emmerton wrote:
Karl Denninger wrote:
So. I have an application that requires six serial ports, and would
like ten. 5.x FreeBSD versions are being EOL'd per the announcement,
forcing me to move to 6.x. The Comtrol driver for the Smart
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:21:32AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
And so looks mine, FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64,
high I/O on disks and I/O on net renders this box unusuable ...
thor# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 12437 1
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:25:31PM +0100, Andrew Gordon wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:04:41PM -0400, Bob Johnson wrote:
I have used USB-to-serial converters with no problem. All the control
signals (at least the ones my applications need)
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:39:50AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:01:07AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:30 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
The network load was minimal at the time. I had everyone log out and
close mail etc.
What were
Nick Gustas wrote:
Oct 4 19:03:09 xxx ppp[55]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Authenticate
Oct 4 19:03:09 xxx ppp[55]: tun0: Phase: deflink: his = PAP, mine = none
Oct 4 19:03:09 xxx ppp[55]: tun0: Phase: Pap Output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 4 19:03:09 xxx ppp[55]: tun0: LCP:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 06:09:09PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
The command 'devfs rule -s 2 apply 100' should fix it, I think.
?
If I read devfs(8) correctly, this should apply rule 100 of ruleset 2.
Since I have no rulesets or rules, it doesn't work. :)
Are you
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:11:05PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
This is very strange. You 3 instances of getty where just reading the
tty input, and all suspectible processes (like sshd) are waiting
on net
events. No processes are blocked on
At 01:53 PM 10/6/2006, Karl Denninger wrote:
Now, where the problem comes in is that THIS line doesn't reference an
attached port. That sucks, but might not be hard to fix:
If there is just one USB *serial* device, it will always be
/dev/ttyU0. It doesnt matter if you have 1 or 3 other USB
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:54:35AM +0200, Michal Mertl wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:14:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
All,
I'm seeing some patterns here with all of the network driver problem
reports, but I need more information to help narrow it down
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:11:05PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
This is very strange. You 3 instances of getty where just reading the
tty input, and all suspectible processes (like sshd) are waiting
on net
events. No processes are blocked on
Roland Smith wrote:
Are you sure that you have no rulesets?
Yup. The command devfs rule showsets shows nothing. This is on
somewhat old RELENG_6.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
On Oct 6, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
If it does lock up again, I'll be sure to let you know!
Was this system patched by the stuff I submitted to you ?
yes. i did not update anything except adding the xl driver to the
kernel, so as to minimize changes.
if this holds
On Oct 6, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm now convinced it was all stemming from some bug in bge driver (at
least for my specific chipset.) Last night I put in an old spare
3c905 NIC and turned off the motherboard bge via BIOS.
We'd be interested in diagnosing this problem
Hi,
I have a gateway/firewall running FreeBSD 6.1 -release . I would like to
capture all incoming and outgoing email messages to archive them. Is there
is any tool available out there ? I mean a proxy,sniffer or any other
solution.
Thanks in advance,
Dominik
2006/10/6, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dominik Zalewski wrote:
Hi,
I have a gateway/firewall running FreeBSD 6.1 -release . I would like to
capture all incoming and outgoing email messages to archive them. Is
there
is any tool available out there ? I mean a proxy,sniffer or any other
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:11:17PM +0200, Dominik Zalewski wrote:
I know most of MTAs can do it but I dont want users to use local MTA for
outgoing emails, plus this solution is just for outgoing emails , what about
pop3 ?
I just want to capture all smtp/pop3 traffic in packets level.
So
On Friday 06 October 2006 23:11, Dominik Zalewski wrote:
2006/10/6, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dominik Zalewski wrote:
Hi,
I have a gateway/firewall running FreeBSD 6.1 -release . I would like
to capture all incoming and outgoing email messages to archive them. Is
there
is any
On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Dominik Zalewski wrote:
I just want to capture all smtp/pop3 traffic in packets level.
OK:
tcpdump -w /var/log/mailarchive.dump -s 0 port smtp or port pop3
But be aware that you should disclose the existence of this mail
monitoring to all users, consult your
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:11:17PM +0200, Dominik Zalewski wrote:
I know most of MTAs can do it but I dont want users to use local MTA for
outgoing emails, plus this solution is just for outgoing emails , what about
pop3 ?
I just want to capture all smtp/pop3 traffic in packets level.
Try
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:02:02PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
I cranked up the debug logging, and compared my ppp login attempts with
your logfile. I get multiple
Oct 6 18:29:43 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(12)
state = Initial
Oct 6 18:29:43 coyote
Jeremy Chadwick wrote this message on Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:08 -0700:
The problem in that case turned out to be duplex-related. Both
boxes were auto-negotiating with the Cisco switch correctly, and
indeed the Cisco labelled them as auto-100/full, but as anyone who
is familiar with Ciscos
cpghost wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:02:02PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
I cranked up the debug logging, and compared my ppp login attempts with
your logfile. I get multiple
Oct 6 18:29:43 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(12)
state = Initial
Oct 6
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006, Dominik Zalewski wrote:
Hi,
I have a gateway/firewall running FreeBSD 6.1 -release . I would like to
capture all incoming and outgoing email messages to archive them. Is there
is any tool available out there ? I mean a proxy,sniffer or any other
solution.
If the
Server just crashed, rebooted and trying to do an fsck, reports the above ...
Never seen that one before :(
FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Sep 18 23:16:11 ADT 2006
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Odd ... ran it a second time after posting this, and it ran through fine ...
--On Saturday, October 07, 2006 02:13:11 -0300 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Server just crashed, rebooted and trying to do an fsck, reports the above ...
Never seen that one before :(
FreeBSD
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:27:21PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 01:53 PM 10/6/2006, Karl Denninger wrote:
Now, where the problem comes in is that THIS line doesn't reference an
attached port. That sucks, but might not be hard to fix:
If there is just one USB *serial* device, it will
I have a commercial spam-blocking tool that runs on FreeBSD which can do
this (along with interdicting all your spam for you.)
Its not freeware tho - its a product.
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internet Consultant Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.netMy home on the
46 matches
Mail list logo
