Sam Leffler wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Today's cvsupdate seems to break kernel build at this pint on FreeBSD
6.2-PRE/AMD64:
awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/ata/atapicam/../../../conf/kmod_syms.awk
atapicam.ko export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % atapicam.ko
objcopy --strip-debug atapicam.ko
=== ath
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based
services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP
port 995, leaving inetd unable to start
On Monday 16 October 2006 16:54, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I need to 'kldunload -f drm' in order to go into suspend to ram
with my thinkpad (suspend works fine with dri disabled).
Unfortunately, despite the claims of the manpage the '-f' flag
does not alter the behaviour of the kldunload tool.
According to make.conf(5):
ENABLE_SUID_SSH
(bool) Set this to install ssh(1) with the set-user-ID bit
turned on.
However, I think ENABLE_SUID_SSH only sets the suid bit for
/usr/libexec/ssh-keysign.
Why isn't /usr/libexec/ssh-keysign suid by default
reposting.
with the latest cvsup'ed, the em is sending packets but not receiving.
the last working version that i have is from 3rd. Oct.
host is S2466 TIGER MPX, but have seen the problem on PIII/STL2 too.
o- there is no if_em changes that i can see.
o- smp/up has no effect
o- there is no
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 02:43, Duane Whitty wrote:
snip
I use native seamonkey-1.0.5 + linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_6 +
linux-flashplugin-7.0r68, and this toolchain worked for simple
flash content under RELENG_6 as of 2006.10.09, and continues to
work under fresh RELENG_6
Just an interesting thing to note ...
Danial Thom is accusing the FreeBSD team of lying and
being dishonest. He's saying that FreeBSD is going to
die and DragonFly BSD will take its place in one year,
and that Matt Dillon had more IQ than the whole FreeBSD
team together.
Not very long ago, the
Quoting Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:00:54 +0100):
On 16/10/06, Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He might have got further by volunteering to create and supply profiles
for those specific workloads that were faster in 4.x than 6.x on UP
machinery etc... i.e. help
Trond Endrestøl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based
services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP
port 995,
Hello,
I get UP/DOWN message since updated new driver little bi longer:
Oct 16 21:14:28 gk kernel: em0: link state changed to DOWN
Oct 16 21:14:43 gk kernel: em0: link state changed to UP
Oct 16 21:16:25 gk kernel: em0: link state changed to DOWN
Oct 16 21:16:40 gk kernel: em0: link state
Big thanks to everybody who responded!
It would be great to get more information about the following chip ids
for which we haven't got any reports yet:
00d410denVidia Corporation nForce3 Pro150 SMBus (MCP)
003410denVidia Corporation nForce4 SMBus (MCP-04)
036810denVidia
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 10:26:34AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
reposting.
with the latest cvsup'ed, the em is sending packets but not receiving.
the last working version that i have is from 3rd. Oct.
host is S2466 TIGER MPX, but have seen the problem on PIII/STL2 too.
o- there is no
Trond Endrestøl wrote:
I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based
services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP
port 995, leaving inetd unable to start any pop3s services.
Le 05/10/2006 à 16:05:52-0400, Kris Kennaway a écrit
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:14:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
All,
I'm seeing some patterns here with all of the network driver problem
reports, but I need more information to help narrow it down further.
I ask all of you who are
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On Monday 16 October 2006 16:54, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I need to 'kldunload -f drm' in order to go into suspend to ram
with my thinkpad (suspend works fine with dri disabled).
Unfortunately, despite the claims of the manpage the '-f' flag
does not alter the behaviour
Hi,
We have a Dell 1950 with the same problem (bce). We tried
debug.mpsafenet=0, but to no avail. It's a very frustrating show-stopper
for us as well, we're moving all 1950 out of the production environment.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
See mail to freebsd-current mail attached.
Kind
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 16:53, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On Monday 16 October 2006 16:54, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I need to 'kldunload -f drm' in order to go into suspend to ram
with my thinkpad (suspend works fine with dri disabled).
Unfortunately, despite the claims
Hi everyone,
tonight when I started my laptop, i was welcomed with a very nice panic, which
was happening JUST when mounting the filesystems.
Some info:
Fault code : supervisor read, page not present.
current process : 112 (mount)
trap 12
panic :page fault
with nm -m I saw that the following
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based
services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP
port 995, leaving inetd
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based
services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my systems got hold of TCP
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 12:25:58AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
Hi everyone,
tonight when I started my laptop, i was welcomed with a very nice panic, which
was happening JUST when mounting the filesystems.
Some info:
Fault code : supervisor read, page not present.
current process :
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:39-0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based
services. Last week rpc.lockd on
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:39-0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
services have occupied the
Michael Proto wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:46:49AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
I have on many occasions run into the situation where the RPC based
services have occupied the well-known ports for other non-RPC based
services. Last week rpc.lockd on one of my
On 16/10/2006 19:15, Andriy Gapon wrote:
If you have a system based on NForce2/3/4, could you please share the
following information:
1. find out pci handle of your SMB controller:
$ pciconf -l | fgrep 0x0c0500
and also note chip field value, it should match 00(64|84|d4|e4|52)10de.
E.g.:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:46:39AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
According to make.conf(5):
ENABLE_SUID_SSH
(bool) Set this to install ssh(1) with the set-user-ID bit
turned on.
However, I think ENABLE_SUID_SSH only sets the suid bit for
Hello,
I have a funny message at boot time, after fsck I see:
real memory = 3489071104 (3407296K bytes)
avail memory = 3394760704 (3315196K bytes)
...
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a
pmap_collect: collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing PMAP_SHPGPERPROC
pmap_collect: collecting pv
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:46:05 +0200
From: O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Leffler wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Today's cvsupdate seems to break kernel build at this pint on FreeBSD
6.2-PRE/AMD64:
awk -f
On Oct 16, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Rong-en Fan wrote:
Yesterday, I saw my all my nfsd stuck in ufs/biord/biowr/getblk.
I saw the same thing some time ago. I break into ddb and do a
'alltrace':
do you have an em or bge ethernet?
Hi Erik, Lin,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:01:11AM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
[Second attempt to send this, since my first seems to have been eaten by my
ISP. Apologies if it appears twice.]
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:40:22PM +0200, Rink Springer wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at
On 10/18/06, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Rong-en Fan wrote:
Yesterday, I saw my all my nfsd stuck in ufs/biord/biowr/getblk.
I saw the same thing some time ago. I break into ddb and do a
'alltrace':
do you have an em or bge ethernet?
Yes. I do have
Hello all,
A friend of mine is interested to use a usb network interface 'Zydas
1201'. Problem seems this usb adapter is not recongnized by FreeBSD
6.1 ?
Can somebody say me if this usb device is supported and how ?
Regards.
___
On Oct 17, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 10/18/06, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Rong-en Fan wrote:
Yesterday, I saw my all my nfsd stuck in ufs/biord/biowr/getblk.
I saw the same thing some time ago. I break into ddb and do a
'alltrace':
do
Card reader won't recognize any CF card and smart card inserted- same reader
works just fine under XP (it automatically downloaded drivers from MS- I say
this because I am sure this device is in working condition)- don't know who
is manufacturer. Any other USB2 and USB1 flash card is working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There has been a lot of discussion on these two mailing lists about the upcoming
EoL of FreeBSD 4.x which I mentioned in my email entitled HEADS UP: FreeBSD
5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon. Now that everybody (hopefully) has had their
say, I'd like to
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:59:46 -0500
Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a bigger issue here? anything I can do to help diagnose / debug
this?
Possibly and no. By recreating the file system you've destroyed
the information needed to isolate the cause. It's known that an
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:11:55AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:59:46 -0500
Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a bigger issue here? anything I can do to help diagnose / debug
this?
Possibly and no. By recreating the file system you've
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:33:50 -0500
Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gotcha - i thought as much... i hoped a dump -0 would save enough info
though. I just needed to have /tmp back in place asap
i'll keep the files around for a week or so in case something comes up.
Good
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:44:39AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:33:50 -0500
Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gotcha - i thought as much... i hoped a dump -0 would save enough info
though. I just needed to have /tmp back in place asap
i'll keep the
From the list digest:
23. FreeBSD 4.x EoL (FreeBSD Security Officer)
A few things immediately jumped out at me, and so I've elided
everything around them so that they stand out; which I believe to be
proper:
From: FreeBSD Security Officer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD 4.x EoL
snip
Michael,
Nice job with this, I'm sure that many people will find it very
helpful. I would like to offer a few suggestions if I may.
Michael W. Oliver wrote:
Colin,
Thanks for the verbose and reasoned explanation. Since the email last
week, I have taken the opportunity to upgrade two
FreeBSD Security Officer wrote:
In short:
* FreeBSD is a volunteer project, and we don't want to volunteer to support
FreeBSD 4.x beyond the scheduled EoL date of January 31st, 2007;
* Even if we did want to support FreeBSD 4.x beyond that date, I'm not certain
that we would be able to do so,
Colin,
Thanks for the verbose and reasoned explanation. Since the email last
week, I have taken the opportunity to upgrade two machines, one here and
one remote (both with serial console) from 4.9-5.5-6.2PRE, and while I
can't say that I did it blindfolded, it wasn't too painful. The upgrade
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 07:07:22PM -0400, Michael W. Oliver wrote:
Colin,
Thanks for the verbose and reasoned explanation. Since the email last
week, I have taken the opportunity to upgrade two machines, one here and
one remote (both with serial console) from 4.9-5.5-6.2PRE, and while I
IMHO very nice offset.
It worked on ali chip, about wich I ask in message with topic: cant start
18, 21-24 hdd drives on 6.2-PRERELEASE/amd64. pls pls hel
I mean sata drive that freebsd fand on ali controller - ad26 (seagate 320 gb
7200.10 sata II)
fsck doesnt fix it. It hangs on
[EMAIL
One can't do anything with this kind of information, think about
it as one that has to fix the issue, we need:
- exact model numbers on the system or mb
- pciconf -l so we can see the real version of the adapter
- What exactly was the driver version that last worked, and
what is the
46 matches
Mail list logo
