Hey Scott,
On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:44, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Sources from today, right before the compile.
I have paused the virtual machine if someone would like me to issue
further db commands.
Thanks,
Scott
FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Nov 11 02:47:35 UTC 2006
[EMAIL
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:25:57AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
There is another fxp ID as well
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/030169.html
Jack Vogel was going to look at it, but I think he is pretty busy
with the em issue and it would be nice to get this
At 01:42 AM 11/11/2006, Scott Long wrote:
surprised by your results. I'm still a bit unclear on the exact
topology of your setup, so if could explain it some more in private
email, I'd appreciate it.
Hi,
I made a quick diagram of the test setup that should make it
more clear
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 08:54, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The kernel itself _will not_ use any SSE or MMX operations when built.
This is because these optimisations are known to break the FreeBSD
kernel. This applies to all i386 architectures, and probably 64-bit
Hello list,
I've installed 6.1 on my laptop, then proceeded with an upgrade to
6-STABLE (as per the handbook).
During the make buildworld step, a file had a spelling error (atomoc
instead of atomic). Becaose o and i were so close I fixed the problem
and ignored it, thinking it was human error.
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 01:55:52PM -0500, Alex Roman wrote:
Hello list,
I've installed 6.1 on my laptop, then proceeded with an upgrade to
6-STABLE (as per the handbook).
During the make buildworld step, a file had a spelling error (atomoc
instead of atomic). Becaose o and i were so close
- Original Message -
From: Alex Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 8:55 PM
Subject: 6-STABLE oddity
Hello list,
I've installed 6.1 on my laptop, then proceeded with an upgrade to
6-STABLE (as per the handbook).
During the make
I upgraded my 6.1-STABLE box a week or so ago, and numerous ports at the same
time. For the last week, I've had all sorts of random reboots on a normally
rock solid system. Yesterday I noticed that whenever I was looking at a
console, the machine was stable as usual, but when X was visible,
I upgraded my 6.1-STABLE box a week or so ago, and numerous ports at the same
time. For the last week, I've had all sorts of random reboots on a normally
rock solid system. Yesterday I noticed that whenever I was looking at a
console, the machine was stable as usual, but when X was visible, the
Most interesting. I will indeed check it out when I get home.
Thanks for the quick reply!
On 11/11/06, Clayton Milos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alex Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 8:55 PM
Subject:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 15:12, Indigo 23 wrote:
I also had similar problems with the latest nvidia drivers on FreeBSD
6.1-STABLE. My box used to run rock solid, then after the update to
.8776, it started locking up under heavy loads when X was running.
Any idea if this is a known bug in
At 01:42 AM 11/11/2006, Scott Long wrote:
driver. What will help me is if you can hook up a serial console to
your machine and see if it can be made to drop to the debugger while it
is under load and otherwise unresponsive. If you can, getting a process
dump might help confirm where each CPU
i've got an ath0 issue similar to this one:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-July/027050.html
this is on 6.2-PRERELEASE from Nov 3
FreeBSD warez.scriptkiddie.org 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri
Nov 3 09:00:14 PST 2006 [EMAIL
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 10:10, Scott Long wrote:
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 03:30, Fredrik Widlund wrote:
Hi,
Will a fix/this fix be part of the 6.2 Release? We will be
relying heavily on fbsd6.2 and pe1950 and are worried about the
BCE stability?
O. Hartmann wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 08:54, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The kernel itself _will not_ use any SSE or MMX operations when built.
This is because these optimisations are known to break the FreeBSD
kernel. This applies to all i386
15 matches
Mail list logo
