Re: kqueue LOR

Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote: Hi, the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is FreeBSD 6.1 with relatively recent kernel, from last week or so. -- VH +lock order reversal: + 1st 0xc537f300 kqueue (kqueue) @

if_tun not working on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hi can anyone confirm that he has working tunnel over if_tun device on 6.2 and amd64? I cannot get it work (using vtund). The configuration is correct, it sets up but no packets go through. any ideas? thnx roman ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

mountd(8) tries to remount / as R/W

Hello, I'm currently working on a project at school where we're creating a minimal fileserver that boots from flash and serves data from a harddisk through NFS. Our /etc/exports is very small at the moment. It only contains: /disk The problem is that FreeBSD tries to remount the flash as

Re: if_tun not working on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 12/12/06, Divacky Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi can anyone confirm that he has working tunnel over if_tun device on 6.2 and amd64? Yes, I have OpenVPN using tun(4) running smoothly on a machine running RELENG_6 on amd64. I cannot get it work (using vtund). The configuration is

Re: mountd(8) tries to remount / as R/W

Hi Ed, On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:36:45AM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: Is it possible to teach mountd to leave the root filesystem alone? This might be due to a change I have made in mountd(8) to prevent it from destroying filesystem flags; could you file a PR for me? I assume this is a recent

Re: mountd(8) tries to remount / as R/W

* Rink Springer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:36:45AM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: Is it possible to teach mountd to leave the root filesystem alone? This might be due to a change I have made in mountd(8) to prevent it from destroying filesystem flags; could you file a PR

Re: kqueue LOR

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote: Hi, the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is FreeBSD 6.1 with relatively recent kernel, from last week or so. --

Re: RELENG_6 panic under heavy load

On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:18:52AM +0800, David Xu wrote: On Thursday 16 November 2006 19:15, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 01:24:36PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T I wonder why UMA was suspected to be the problem. Dima gave T me access to the core. Here are more details

Re: RELENG_6 panic under heavy load

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 20:22, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:18:52AM +0800, David Xu wrote: On Thursday 16 November 2006 19:15, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 01:24:36PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T I wonder why UMA was suspected to be the

Re: kqueue LOR

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: Is the mount lock really required, if all we're doing is a single read of a single word (mnt_kern_flags) (v_mount should be read-only for the whole lifetime of the vnode, I believe)?

Re: RELENG_6 panic under heavy load

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:49:21PM +0800, David Xu wrote: I've tested it. This patch works also, but with a little bit different behaviour. With patch from jhb@ I got LA 7-8, with this patch I have LA 5-6, same as on unpatched system. But it seems to me, that system is less interactive,

Re: kqueue LOR

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:49:42PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: Is the mount lock really required, if all we're doing is a single read of a single word (mnt_kern_flags) (v_mount

Re: kqueue LOR

2006/12/12, Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote: Hi, the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is FreeBSD 6.1 with

Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R - 6.1R

Hello Doug On 11 Dec 2006, at 21:46, Doug Barton wrote: Greg Eden wrote: Hello I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup and buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the number of Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on both boxes.

2G+ KVA on mad64

Can FreeBSD/amd64 support more than 2G+ KVA ? Is it safe to set KPDPI to (NPDPEPG-4) in /sys/amd64/include/pmap.h to get 4G KVA ? Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

6.2-RC1 em(4) issue - freezes during CD boot

I'm attempting to install 6.2-RC1 on a box that ran 5.3, 5.4, 6.0, and 6.1 for the past few years, but the 6.2-RC1 CD won't boot. After it detects the em0 NIC, before it gets into sysinstall, it freezes solid. I've let it sit there for over an hour. I know there has been some recent work on

Re: 6.2-RC1 em(4) issue - freezes during CD boot

On 12/12/06, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm attempting to install 6.2-RC1 on a box that ran 5.3, 5.4, 6.0, and 6.1 for the past few years, but the 6.2-RC1 CD won't boot. After it detects the em0 NIC, before it gets into sysinstall, it freezes solid. I've let it sit there for over

FreeBSD 6.2

Hi everyone http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/schedule.html is not being updated for a long time. Is FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE going to become a christmas present? Jack ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE a Xmas present?

Hi everyone http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/schedule.html is not being updated for a long time. Is FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE going to become a christmas present? Jack ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: 6.2-RC1 em(4) issue - freezes during CD boot

On 12/12/06, Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/12/06, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm attempting to install 6.2-RC1 on a box that ran 5.3, 5.4, 6.0, and 6.1 for the past few years, but the 6.2-RC1 CD won't boot. After it detects the em0 NIC, before it gets into

asr / raidutil not available for 6.x either ... ? :(

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Installed it from ports, and it installed the compat4x stuff, but although it runs with no args, as soon as I try to access the controller: # raidutil -d 1 -L physical osdIOrequest : File /dev/rdptr17 Could Not Be Opened Engine connect failed:

Re: FreeBSD 6.2

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:41:34PM +0100, Jack Raats wrote.. Hi everyone http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/schedule.html is not being updated for a long time. Is FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE going to become a christmas present? Only if Santa thinks you have been nice to your family the last

Re: FreeBSD 6.2

Hi everyone http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/schedule.html is not being updated for a long time. Is FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE going to become a christmas present? Only if Santa thinks you have been nice to your family the last year :) -- Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] Santa knows, so

Re: kqueue LOR

Attilio Rao wrote: 2006/12/12, Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote: Hi, the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is

Re: asr / raidutil not available for 6.x either ... ? :(

Marc G. Fournier wrote: Installed it from ports, and it installed the compat4x stuff, but although it runs with no args, as soon as I try to access the controller: # raidutil -d 1 -L physical osdIOrequest : File /dev/rdptr17 Could Not Be Opened Engine connect failed: COMPATILITY number

Re: deadlock in zoneli state on 6.2-PRERELEASE

No luck at all. patch-zonelim-drain-20061212 works for me as a previos one. no panics, but still zoneli. All this is very odd, because other two squid servers works perfectly in the same loadbalancer with out any patches and kernel panics. I think that the case with this server is realy rare

Re: kqueue LOR

2006/12/12, Suleiman Souhlal [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Attilio Rao wrote: 2006/12/12, Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote: Hi, the

Re: deadlock in zoneli state on 6.2-PRERELEASE

Nikolay Pavlov wrote: No luck at all. patch-zonelim-drain-20061212 works for me as a previos one. no panics, but still zoneli. All this is very odd, because other two squid servers works perfectly in the same loadbalancer with out any patches and kernel panics. I think that the case

Re: kqueue LOR

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 13:43, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: Attilio Rao wrote: 2006/12/12, Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:

Re: deadlock in zoneli state on 6.2-PRERELEASE

On Wednesday, 13 December 2006 at 3:02:40 +0800, LI Xin wrote: Nikolay Pavlov wrote: No luck at all. patch-zonelim-drain-20061212 works for me as a previos one. no panics, but still zoneli. All this is very odd, because other two squid servers works perfectly in the same loadbalancer

Re: panic: sleeping thread

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Monday, December 11, 2006 17:40:22 -0500 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe use ssh -e none? You don't need to break into ddb though, when it panics it will print out more useful info on its own. Ah, like: Sleeping thread

Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R - 6.1R

On 12/11/06, Greg Eden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup and buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the number of Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on both boxes. One is a HP DL360g3, the other is a HP

Re: panic: sleeping thread

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 15:47, Marc G. Fournier wrote: --On Monday, December 11, 2006 17:40:22 -0500 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe use ssh -e none? You don't need to break into ddb though, when it panics it will print out more useful info on its own. Ah, like:

Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R - 6.1R

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:07:28PM +, Greg Eden wrote: I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup and buildworld. Greg, This may or may not be any help (read: possible red herring). But from looking at your below dmesg, I don't see any signs of SMP being used:

Re: panic: sleeping thread

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 16:12:50 -0500 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 12 December 2006 15:47, Marc G. Fournier wrote: --On Monday, December 11, 2006 17:40:22 -0500 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe

BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:40:48 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll try the -e none the next time it crashes, unless someone else has another idea for doing it? Actually, I'll try the -e none after its up again,

Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R - 6.1R

On 12 Dec 2006, at 20:48, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 12/11/06, Greg Eden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup and buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the number of Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:49:33 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:40:48 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll try

Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R - 6.1R

On 12 Dec 2006, at 21:39, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:07:28PM +, Greg Eden wrote: I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup and buildworld. Greg, This may or may not be any help (read: possible red herring). But from looking at your below

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 22:59, Marc G. Fournier wrote: --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:49:33 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:40:48 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

On Tuesday 12 December 2006 16:59, Marc G. Fournier wrote: --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:49:33 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:40:48 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 23:40:36 +0100 Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 12 December 2006 22:59, Marc G. Fournier wrote: --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:49:33 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:40:17 -0500 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KDB_UNATTENDED should make it do a coredump and not bother with dropping into ddb when it panics. Its not ... it just prints everything out and then just

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:40:17 -0500 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KDB_UNATTENDED should make it do a coredump and not bother with dropping into ddb when it panics. Would setting this to 1 help me any: # sysctl -d

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17:40:17 -0500 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KDB_UNATTENDED should make it do a coredump and not bother with dropping into ddb when it panics. 'k, I'm updating my kernel/world to todays, removed

how to disable exec attributes on ntfs mounts ?

Hello, I wonder why there is no -M option for mount_ntfs(8) as it is there for mount_msdosfs(8) ?? I am trying to get rid of executable attributes for files but with -m option only it is not possible as it changes directories too. I'm using the following options for msdosfs: msdosfs

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 20:43:07 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 'k, I'm updating my kernel/world to todays, removed KDB_UNATTENDED and changed BREAK_TO... to ALT_BREAK_TO... to see if its escape sequence will serve

Re: kqueue LOR

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 12 December 2006 13:43, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: Why is memory barrier usage not encouraged? As you said, they can be used to reduce the number of atomic (LOCKed) operations, in some cases. ... Admittedly, they are harder to use than atomic

Re: bus_dmamem_alloc in drm / radeon

I am having nearly the same problem. I startx and the machine ether hangs or kernel panics. I tried to look at the crash dumps but I am no expert will kgdb. Brian A. Seklecki wrote: A highly repeatable situation: FreeBSD soundwave 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Sep 13

Re: kqueue LOR

Hmm, may be, since vnode must be interlocked by ffs_sync() after MNTK_SUSPENDED set, and before MNTK_SUSPEND, mount interlock is not needed in ufs_itimes. Tor ? If neither IN_CHANGE nor IN_UPDATE is set then it might be unsafe to set IN_MODIFIED in ufs_itimes() since the file system might

pf killing NFS

Hi all, I'm running a 6.2-RC1 box (cvsup'd today) that has two broadcom nics. One is an internal network (nfs) and the other is external. PF has this rule for all traffic on the private net: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/jails]# pfctl -sr|grep bge1 pass in quick on bge1 inet from 192.168.1.0/24

g_vfs_done() failures on 6.2-RC1

Hi, I have seen g_vfs_done() failures with absurd offsets in the face of heavy I/O. Recovery doesn't seem to happen, leading to the need to reboot the system. The problem seems to occur without any underlying disk device failure. An example from yesterday: This message repeats on the

Re: 6.2-RC1 em(4) issue - freezes during CD boot

Jack Vogel wrote: UH, can't do anything if you don't give any information, saying its a 'box' and it has an 'em' is useless. We have installed RC1 on a number of systems without problem. Yes, I understand that. I was after what info would be useful. You gave me a few ideas, thanks. As

Re: pf killing NFS

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Charles Sprickman wrote: Hi all, I'm running a 6.2-RC1 box (cvsup'd today) that has two broadcom nics. One is an internal network (nfs) and the other is external. PF has this rule for all traffic on the private net: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/jails]# pfctl -sr|grep

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 20:43:07 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 'k, I'm updating my kernel/world to todays, removed KDB_UNATTENDED and changed BREAK_TO... to ALT_BREAK_TO... to see if its escape sequence

Strange panics

Hello! I'm getting lots of panics on quite lightly loaded box under 6.1-RELEASE. The box runned two jails without any flaws for several weeks, after adding third one it begins to panics at least once a day. I have no idea on what could cause this. Here is my dmesg.boot (partially, I can

Re: g_vfs_done() failures on 6.2-RC1

Jan Mikkelsen wrote: - Daichi Goto's unionfs-p16 has been applied. - The Areca driver is 1.20.00.12 from the Areca website. - sym(4) patch (see PR/89550), but no sym controller present. - SMP + FAST_IPSEC + SUIDDIR + device crypto. So: I've seen this problem on a few machines under

Re: g_vfs_done() failures on 6.2-RC1

On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:25:49AM -0700 I heard the voice of Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus: You mention that you are using a driver from the Areca website. Have you tried using the stock driver that comes with FreeBSD? I don't know if it will be better or not, but I was planning on

Re: BREAK TO DDB over SSH (Was: Re: panic: sleeping thread)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, December 13, 2006 08:53:32 +0200 Danny Braniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: have you tried enabling ttyd0 in /etc/ttys? Although I'm willing to try just about anything, to what effect? I don't have anything attached to any