On Sunday, 11. February 2007 02:43, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
So far so good. The problem is that the BSD magicians and the KDE GUI
magicians are not sharing their spell-books, and thus, their models of
how the code operates; the communities have to intersect somehow. That
could be you, y'know.
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 06:15:53PM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote:
Under gmirror OS must issue two commands to write to disks and some
commands to check/set mark that mirrored data is intact.
Under hardware RAID OS issue sonly one command to write and no
checking command, since raid
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 03:06 +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
[ snip ]
All that your bug report accomplishes is broadcasting your bad and
uninformed attitude to an even bigger audience. It is in your own and the
FreeBSD community's best interest to backtrack before anyone gets to form a
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:21:33 +0100,
Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
I've convinced myself that this problem needs to be tested in isolation
(i.e. you have complete control over both ends of the tunnel) because
incoming packets over the tunnel cause the host route
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
Confirmed. I've updated the machine on which I originally had this
problem to -STABLE as of today, and the problem has disappeared.
I thought it was also planned to be incorporated to RELENG_6_2, right?
I'm not sure if non-security related fixes are considered
Hi list,
Last Friday I upgraded my 6.1 to 6.2. This box is Compaq DL320G1 with the all
latest firmwares running only cvsup-mirror service for other servers. No
customization, any extra setting, default setup whatsoever.
The upgrade went fine, no problems I encountered. It was not binary
If memory serves me right, Dimitry Andric wrote:
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
Confirmed. I've updated the machine on which I originally had this
problem to -STABLE as of today, and the problem has disappeared.
I thought it was also planned to be incorporated to RELENG_6_2, right?
I'm not
I've upgraded my laptop from 6.2-prerelease to latest 6-stable and it
stuck at booting because mount can't recognize force option in the
fstab. The file system is ext2fs and this looks like a genuine regression.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
In mpc.lists.freebsd.stable, you wrote:
: For modern CPUs this extra work is measurably neglegible.
With all of the interrupt activity it seems counterintuitive that it
would be negligible in that the processor is incurring many extra
cache faults to service the controller.
On Monday 12 February 2007 00:34, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
One guy that I happen to know, who was responsible for the database
backend servers of Germany's biggest web mail provider at the time,
ran extensive benchmarks. Result: for RAID 1, RAID 0 and RAID 1+0
there is no difference in
Hi, all!
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:40:18AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007 00:34, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
One guy that I happen to know, who was responsible for the database
backend servers of Germany's biggest web mail provider at the time,
ran extensive
Hi All,
I am having intermittent network issues with our IBM X236 dual xeon server.
Server comes with two bge network cards. At random intervals internal lan
drops out. And then few minutes later it comes back online.
So far I can only find some interface errors on netstat -i. Can anyone help
On Monday 12 February 2007 10:21, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Software RAID won't help you if your primary disk gets an error in, say,
the second stage loader.
I don't really buy this booting arguement. What's the failure scenario
here? If the system is up and running, it will just keep
Hi,
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 PC as the server to a PXE boot
of another Compaq Deskpro EN PC.
The Compaq PC has the option of a Network Service
Boot with the F12-key during BIOS boot up. On the
server, tftpd, bootpd and dhcpd are all working well.
For the diskless kernel config I have used the
14 matches
Mail list logo
