Re: acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x40 0x00 0x01

2007-04-20 Thread Andrei V. Lavreniyuk
Hi! ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default ad0: 114473MB WDC WD1200JB-00GVA0 08.02D08 at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4163B/A104 at ata1-master UDMA33 ad4: 152627MB WDC

Re: acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x40 0x00 0x01

2007-04-20 Thread pluknet
On 20/04/07, Andrei V. Lavreniyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default ad0: 114473MB WDC WD1200JB-00GVA0 08.02D08 at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR HL-DT-ST

hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: Invalid argument

2007-04-20 Thread Andrei V. Lavreniyuk
Hi! # uname -a FreeBSD datacenter.technica-03.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Thu Apr 19 21:04:38 EEST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP-DATACENTER i386 console.log Apr 19

LOR - ath (similar to LOR #42) on FreeBSD 6-STABLE 2007.04.08.19.20.49

2007-04-20 Thread Parv
(Before Apr 8 update, I built the world+kernel as of 2007.03.29.21.58.25 UTC.) I am running FreeBSD 6-STABLE as of 2007.04.08.19.20.49 UTC, with ath0 driver for Belkin My Essentials Wireless G card, which I had been using without problems until now. Some of current configuration is ...

Re: acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x40 0x00 0x01

2007-04-20 Thread Andrei V. Lavreniyuk
Hi! On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:37:08PM -0700, pete wright wrote: ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default ad0: 114473MB WDC WD1200JB-00GVA0 08.02D08 at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR

Crash

2007-04-20 Thread Larry Rosenman
I have the vmcore as well: # kgdb -c vmcore.0 /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THEBIGHONKER/kernel.debug [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Unde fined symbol ps_pglobal_lookup] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software,

Re: tproxy on freebsd

2007-04-20 Thread Alexey Karagodov
real transparent proxy provided by Cisco's WCCP with, for example, Squid. this protocol detects HTTP (and so on) traffic on any port and redirects it to proxy-server. same thing (not just permanent redirection of port 80 to proxy but *DETECTING* HTTP traffic and proxying it) can be achived by

Re: LOR - ath (similar to LOR #42) on FreeBSD 6-STABLE 2007.04.08.19.20.49

2007-04-20 Thread Parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Parv thusly... (Before Apr 8 update, I built the world+kernel as of 2007.03.29.21.58.25 UTC.) I am running FreeBSD 6-STABLE as of 2007.04.08.19.20.49 UTC, with ath0 driver for Belkin My Essentials Wireless G card, which I had been using without problems

Re: sio0: port may not be enabled

2007-04-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 06:03:22PM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote: Hi list, I have some problems with one of my servers and need serial to investigate more, unfortunately I have and problems with serial port too. from dmesg: sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port

Problem with USB Legacy support on HP/Compaq DX2200

2007-04-20 Thread Thomas Nyström
Hello! If I boot 6.2-RELEASE (from CD), I have USB Legacy support enabled in BIOS and have the USB keyboard connected in the rear, the system panics right after the line: vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 talking about ohci-something not listen to some

sio0: port may not be enabled

2007-04-20 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hi list, I have some problems with one of my servers and need serial to investigate more, unfortunately I have and problems with serial port too. from dmesg: sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Sven Willenberger
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:50 -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote: I currently have a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 SMP with dual intel PRO/1000PM nics configured as follows: em0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU inet

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote: Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at all. It turns out that the same timeouts will happen when ftp'ing to the physical address IPs as well. There is also an odd situation here depending on

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Sven Willenberger
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:04 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote: Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at all. It turns out that the same timeouts will happen when ftp'ing to the physical address IPs

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Clayton Milos
- Original Message - From: Sven Willenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:25 PM Subject: Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:04 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Apr

Re: sio0: port may not be enabled

2007-04-20 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Look closely at the dmesg line, note what device sio0 is claiming to be associated with (acpi0, not isa0): sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 This is one of the drawbacks to using ACPI. This

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Jack Vogel
On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote: Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at all. It turns out that the same timeouts will happen when ftp'ing to the physical address IPs as

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Sven Willenberger
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote: Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at all. It turns out that the same timeouts

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Sven Willenberger
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 18:46 +0200, Clayton Milos wrote: - Original Message - From: Sven Willenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:25 PM Subject: Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog On Fri,

Re: sio0: port may not be enabled

2007-04-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 09:45:43AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Look closely at the dmesg line, note what device sio0 is claiming to be associated with (acpi0, not isa0): sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4

Re: sio0: port may not be enabled

2007-04-20 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Apr 20, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 09:45:43AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Look closely at the dmesg line, note what device sio0 is claiming to be associated with (acpi0, not isa0): sio0:

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Jack Vogel
On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote: Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Sven Willenberger
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 11:27 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote:

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:04:31 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote: Having done more diagnostics I have found out it is not CARP related at all. It turns out that the same timeouts will

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Jack Vogel
On 4/20/07, Brian McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/20/07, Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?

2007-04-20 Thread Alexey Karagodov
kernel config please and /etc/sysctl.conf 2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello! On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like scheduler use only one. (from dmesg) Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988,

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?

2007-04-20 Thread Alexey Karagodov
and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. 2007/4/19, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello! On the Pentium-D box, kernel detects both CPUs, but it seems like scheduler use

Re: CARP and em0 timeout watchdog

2007-04-20 Thread Brian McCann
On 4/20/07, Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/20/07, Sven Willenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:17 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: On 4/20/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Sven Willenberger wrote: Having

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?

2007-04-20 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. I thought it was pretty

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?

2007-04-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network

Re: hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: Invalid argument

2007-04-20 Thread Lars Stokholm
Andrei V. Lavreniyuk wrote: Hi! # uname -a FreeBSD datacenter.technica-03.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Thu Apr 19 21:04:38 EEST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP-DATACENTER i386 console.log

Re: HEADS UP: Recompile milters after sendmail 8.14 upgrade

2007-04-20 Thread Gregory Shapiro
Unfortunately, this problem (the need to recompile filters) was found after the MFC. The release engineering team has asked for this notice instead of doing a full backout of sendmail 8.14 in the RELENG_[456] branches. Note that I have some new code, currently under review, that eliminates