ATA driver/gmirror problems, multiple boxes...

2007-04-25 Thread Johan Ström
Hello I got a few boxes, elfi crus and gw-1, running gmirror. These are three completely different boxes, but all are running 6.1. They all have multiple disks which are gmirrored, two of them SATA-only and one has a mirror between one SATA and one ATA. Some times now and then they all

Re: Dell SAS5 Performance Issue

2007-04-25 Thread Matthew Jacob
I've been trying to get one in my lab. I also am completely saturated with two jobs and a new infant (which is why I'm responding to this at 0100) and was trying to get a box in my lab that evidenced te behaviour. If I get stuck when I actually get time to chase this, I'll ask- thanks. On

Re: How to report bugs (Re: 6.2-STABLE deadlock?)

2007-04-25 Thread Oleg Derevenetz
Цитирую Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oleg Derevenetz wrote: ??? LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [...] I'm not very sure if this is specific to one disk controller. Actually I got some occasional reports about similar hangs on amd64 6.2-RELEASE (slightly patched version) that

Re: Dell SAS5 Performance Issue

2007-04-25 Thread Tom Judge
Matthew Jacob wrote: I've been trying to get one in my lab. I also am completely saturated with two jobs and a new infant (which is why I'm responding to this at 0100) and was trying to get a box in my lab that evidenced te behaviour. If I get stuck when I actually get time to chase this, I'll

6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D

2007-04-25 Thread Alex Povolotsky
Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows cluster-one# mptable -verbose === MPTable looking for EBDA pointer @

Re: How to report bugs (Re: 6.2-STABLE deadlock?)

2007-04-25 Thread LI Xin
Oleg Derevenetz wrote: [snip] Not all people can do deadlock debugging, though. In my case turning on INVARIANTS and WITNESS leads to unacceptable performance penalty due to heavily loaded server. So I can only describe my case, actions and result without providing any debug information.

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?

2007-04-25 Thread Alex Povolotsky
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what is this, i mean why: WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING:

threads question

2007-04-25 Thread Dmitriy Kirhlarov
Hi, list. I have problem with fresh openldap server with RELENG_6 from middle of February and can't reproduce it with RELENG_6 from August 2006. Details can be found in thread, started from http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200704/msg00249.html (only link. I don't want spamming

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?

2007-04-25 Thread Alexey Karagodov
please, dmesg, mptable -verbose, mptable -grope 2007/4/25, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 From: Alexey Karagodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?

2007-04-25 Thread Alex Povolotsky
Alexey Karagodov wrote: please, dmesg, mptable -verbose, mptable -grope 2007/4/25, Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400

k3b problem

2007-04-25 Thread Ganbold
Dear Thomas, Can you take a look at src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c,v 1.42.2.3? With this revision of atapi-cam.c k3b application hangs on splash screen and I had to use power button only to restart the machine. This is observed with RELENG_6 and recent k3b port. Other people had similar

Top not showing 4 cpus on 2 xeons with HT

2007-04-25 Thread Artem Kuchin
I am just wondering if it is normal. I have two xeon processors with HT on each of them. When loading kernel says that 4 cpu's are found, but when i do top i can see only 0 or 2 in the C column. never 1 or 3. Is it normal? FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE (cvsed 1 day ago) -- Regards. Artem

GIANT LOCKED raid driver

2007-04-25 Thread Artem Kuchin
We use 3ware cards (twe driver) on most of our server. While it is a very good raid controller it's driver is still GIANT LOCKED and i think this reduces perfomance of the server (they do a lot of disk io). Does anyone know a good raid controller (raid-5 not really needed, mirror is enough)

Re: Top not showing 4 cpus on 2 xeons with HT

2007-04-25 Thread Richard Tector
Artem Kuchin wrote: I am just wondering if it is normal. I have two xeon processors with HT on each of them. When loading kernel says that 4 cpu's are found, but when i do top i can see only 0 or 2 in the C column. never 1 or 3. Is it normal? FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE (cvsed 1 day ago) If I remember

Re: k3b problem

2007-04-25 Thread Thomas Quinot
* Ganbold, 2007-04-25 : With this revision of atapi-cam.c k3b application hangs on splash screen and I had to use power button only to restart the machine. I am confused. Is your *application* hanging, or is the *whole system* hanging? In either case nothing can be said on this problem

Re: ATA driver/gmirror problems, multiple boxes...

2007-04-25 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Johan Ström wrote: Hello I got a few boxes, elfi crus and gw-1, running gmirror. These are three completely different boxes, but all are running 6.1. They all have multiple disks which are gmirrored, two of them SATA-only and one has a mirror between one SATA and one ATA. Some times now

mount_nullfs in jail, set times error on symlinked files

2007-04-25 Thread Thomas
Hi I jailed my ftp server. Rsync processes inside my jail syncing remote files. I receive a lot of errors like: rsync: failed to set times on /usr/local/data/ftp/mirror/x.org/pub/X11R7.0/doc/html/XF86VidModeGetPermissions.3.html: Operation not permitted (1) All set times error are triggered by

Re: Top not showing 4 cpus on 2 xeons with HT

2007-04-25 Thread Artem Kuchin
Richard Tector wrote: Artem Kuchin wrote: I am just wondering if it is normal. I have two xeon processors with HT on each of them. When loading kernel says that 4 cpu's are found, but when i do top i can see only 0 or 2 in the C column. never 1 or 3. Is it normal? FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE (cvsed 1

Re: Top not showing 4 cpus on 2 xeons with HT

2007-04-25 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 16:50 +0400, Artem Kuchin wrote: Richard Tector wrote: Artem Kuchin wrote: I am just wondering if it is normal. I have two xeon processors with HT on each of them. When loading kernel says that 4 cpu's are found, but when i do top i can see only 0 or 2 in the C

Re: Top not showing 4 cpus on 2 xeons with HT

2007-04-25 Thread Søren Klintrup
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:26:02 +0400, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am just wondering if it is normal. I have two xeon processors with HT on each of them. When loading kernel says that 4 cpu's are found, but when i do top i can see only 0 or 2 in the C column. never 1 or 3. Is it

jemalloc on 6-stable

2007-04-25 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
Hello, How jemalloc can be used on 6-stable? Can I just copy src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c from current or other changes also should be done? -- Anton Yuzhaninov. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D

2007-04-25 Thread Oliver Fromme
Alex Povolotsky wrote: I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows Hyperthreading is disabled by default in FreeBSD (for security reasons). You can enable it via sysctl if you want

Re: question: +swap_pager_getswapspace(16): failed

2007-04-25 Thread Oliver Fromme
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: I have a little understanding problem: My box has 128MB memory, far enough for the task. Are you sure? I see you're running perl scripts. Those can easily (and sometimes unexpectedly) eat a lot of memory. After a few days I always see some processes dying

Re: How to report bugs (Re: 6.2-STABLE deadlock?)

2007-04-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:14:20PM +0400, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: Until you (or a developer) have analyzed the resulting information, you cannot definitively determine whether or not your problem is the same as a given random other problem, and you may just confuse the issue by making

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D

2007-04-25 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows cluster-one# mptable -verbose

Re: How to report bugs (Re: 6.2-STABLE deadlock?)

2007-04-25 Thread Oleg Derevenetz
Цитирую Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:14:20PM +0400, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: Until you (or a developer) have analyzed the resulting information, you cannot definitively determine whether or not your problem is the same as a given random other problem, and

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D

2007-04-25 Thread Artem Kuchin
John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows Hmm. I am running PentiumD 3.0 Ghz on Asus p5p800-vm

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D

2007-04-25 Thread Alex Povolotsky
John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable shows cluster-one# mptable -verbose

Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU on pentium D

2007-04-25 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 03:20:05 pm Alex Povolotsky wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote: Hello! I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1 launched, but I never see any process running on it, and

Re: k3b problem

2007-04-25 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Wednesday, 25. April 2007, Thomas Quinot wrote: * Ganbold, 2007-04-25 : With this revision of atapi-cam.c k3b application hangs on splash screen and I had to use power button only to restart the machine. I am confused. Is your *application* hanging, or is the *whole system* hanging

Re: [kde-freebsd] problem hal - k3b ?

2007-04-25 Thread Beni
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 16:49:28 Zoran Kolic wrote: This problem appear in my system after updating system and ports on April, 06. K3b hangs either after loading splash screen or after eject wrote media from device. Aside that new atapi-cam.c is proven to work, I'd like to know if

mesg = dmesg

2007-04-25 Thread KAYVEN RIESE
i sent a post from a puter with a bad d key. that's why my subject didn't say dmesg like it should have. sorry. here is a dmesg output: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University

Re: 6.2-STABLE deadlock?

2007-04-25 Thread Adrian Wontroba
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote: Another 6-STABLE (cvsupped on 27/03/07) example, with diagnostics taken rather sooner after the hang. Processes with wmesg=ufs feature often in the ps output. Thanks for the assorted replies. I'll try using INVARIANTS, as I'd

Re: How to report bugs (Re: 6.2-STABLE deadlock?)

2007-04-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:20:25PM +0400, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: ??? Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:14:20PM +0400, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: Until you (or a developer) have analyzed the resulting information, you cannot definitively determine whether

Re: 6.2-STABLE deadlock?

2007-04-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 02:01:57AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:56:32AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote: Another 6-STABLE (cvsupped on 27/03/07) example, with diagnostics taken rather sooner after the hang. Processes with wmesg=ufs feature often in the ps output.

UFS: optimization changed

2007-04-25 Thread Oleg Gritsak
Hello, dear sirs! I'm just curious about some possible mismatch in between documentation and reallife OS behaviour... Noticed this thing for more than two years ago in 4.X and now seing this in 6.2... It is said in man newfs and man tunefs that threshhold for online optimization (space or