On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
Regards,
Rong-En Fan
I've been using r/w nullfs in production for
On 6/19/07, Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
Regards,
Rong-En
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 6/19/07, Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs
I use it all the time for compiles on top of nfs
On 6/18/07, Rong-en Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
Regards,
Rong-En
Rodrigo Galiano wrote:
No, if you make 'deinstall' under a specific port it will only uninstall
the
software package with the dependencies. If you want to deinstall
dependencies do the command 'make clean' to check out what will be
actually
installed and diff the output with the results
Sigh . . .
Here are the patches I was trying to upload when the PR was closed
without mercy. :)
jmc
# Patch for misc/113825 for csup
#
# To apply this patch:
# STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory.
# STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input.
#
# If you do not
Maybe you would like unified diff's better? Sorry . . .
jmc
# misc/113825
#
# To apply this patch:
# STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory.
# STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input.
#
# If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package
# that
Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
I've been using a r/w nullfs for the last several months with no issues.
Granted, I don't do a
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer
kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show
nothing. I can find no logs errors anywhere but a telnet to port 80
On Sunday 17 June 2007 00:24, Artem Kuchin wrote:
Maybe someone can englighten me when
inode change time changes? What must be done
with file to change it (except writing to it)?
stat(2) would be very enlightening in this context.
I tried chmoding - it does not affect inode time.
chmod
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 23:40 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer
kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show
nothing.
Tom Evans wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 23:40 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer
kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show
Greetings!
brbr
You have a state-of-the-art software application, but do your customers know
it?br /
br /
Bridge the gap between your latest software solutions and the end user with
video.br /
br /
PixelFish is a video production company that excels at producing high-quality
videos that sell.
Greetings!
brbr
You have a state-of-the-art software application, but do your customers know
it?br /
br /
Bridge the gap between your latest software solutions and the end user with
video.br /
br /
PixelFish is a video production company that excels at producing high-quality
videos that sell.
Hello,
I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed
6.2-STABLE with the
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p19-20070504.diff
patch and have a problem with devfs mounted over unionfs.
I made a testsetup in March where I used a 6.2-STABLE at that
time without
Hi!
I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed
6.2-STABLE with the
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p19-20070504.diff
patch and have a problem with devfs mounted over unionfs.
Going back to the most recent stable without unionfs6-p19-20070504
works.
Rong-en Fan wrote:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering
if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment?
My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw.
Is this still the case?
nullfs is quite stable from my impression at least for my workload. We
use it for some heavily
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:26:59 +0100
Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't this imply that the OP was running Skype as root?
touche.
but from what OP described, that's what was happening... :D ouch :D
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Any society that would give up a
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486
This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change current/
expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, many systems
to not get useless e-mail.
It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done...
--
Jo
19 matches
Mail list logo
