Re: FBSD 7.1 XEON Quad Core

On 12.02.2009 3:12 Uhr, SDH Support wrote: Yes, if you have (or plan to have) more than 3 GB of memory. FYI I have had a lot of problems with FBSD7.x and HP DL-series hardware + amd64. There is a bug IIRC in the loader. I had problems with DL3X0G5 when booting with PXE, every now an

Re: FBSD 7.1 XEON Quad Core

On 12.02.2009 3:12 Uhr, SDH Support wrote: Yes, if you have (or plan to have) more than 3 GB of memory. FYI I have had a lot of problems with FBSD7.x and HP DL-series hardware + amd64. There is a bug IIRC in the loader. I had problems with DL3X0G5 when booting with PXE,

Re: CFT: ath hal src switchover

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:32:45PM +0100, Bengt Ahlgren wrote: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile/2009-February/011343.html What clockrate do you run at? On my system (Thinkpad X40, Atheros 5212) the problem does not occur at kern.hz=1000, but it is present at kern.hz=100.

FreeBSD 7.1-Stable only support 16 CPUs !?

Dear all, Does any ever try FreeBSD 7.1-stable on box that has more than 16 CPU? I got a HP ProLiant DL 785 G5 with 32 core (Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8356 (2300.10-MHz K8-class CPU) and 256G memory. When I boot this machine, it could detect 32 core, but only 16 core could be

Re: FreeBSD 7.1-Stable only support 16 CPUs !?

Quoting James Chang, who wrote on Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:54:00PM +0800 .. Dear all, Does any ever try FreeBSD 7.1-stable on box that has more than 16 CPU? I got a HP ProLiant DL 785 G5 with 32 core (Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8356 (2300.10-MHz K8-class CPU) and 256G memory.

Re: FreeBSD 7.1-Stable only support 16 CPUs !?

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, James Chang wrote: Does any ever try FreeBSD 7.1-stable on box that has more than 16 CPU? I got a HP ProLiant DL 785 G5 with 32 core (Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8356 (2300.10-MHz K8-class CPU) and 256G memory. When I boot this machine, it could detect 32

6.2: LOR between kqueue and mount mtx

Hello. I'm just curious if ufs_vnops.c#rev1.290 fixes this LOR (or not): lock order reversal: 1st 0xcc9d1b00 kqueue (kqueue) @ /usr/src/sys_uvmem_uip.6.2_RELEASE/kern/kern_event.c:1547 2nd 0xc6d6b854 struct mount mtx (struct mount mtx) @

Re: 6.2: LOR between kqueue and mount mtx

2009/2/12 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com: Hello. I'm just curious if ufs_vnops.c#rev1.290 fixes this LOR (or not): I found it was discussed already. Sorry for noise. -- wbr, pluknet ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Problem with SATA/SAS 5iR

Hi, I have a problem with a Dell Poweredge SC440 computer. It's equipped with a Dell SATA/SAS 5iR controller, it's from LSI actually (maybe megaraid). I'm using FreeBSD 7.1 Release I have 2x 500 GB SATA in a synchronised(status optimal) RAID-1 logical volume. The machine is brand new, first

Re: Problem with SATA/SAS 5iR

Kevin Smith wrote: Hi, I have a problem with a Dell Poweredge SC440 computer. It's equipped with a Dell SATA/SAS 5iR controller, it's from LSI actually (maybe megaraid). I'm using FreeBSD 7.1 Release I have 2x 500 GB SATA in a synchronised(status optimal) RAID-1 logical volume. The machine

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

Guy Helmer wrote: Pete French wrote: I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0 perfectly happily. I have been testing 7.1 in it's various incarnations for the last couple of months on our test server and it has performed perfectly. So the last two days I have been round

Re: Problem with SATA/SAS 5iR

2009/2/12 Richard Tector richardtec...@thekeelecentre.com Kevin Smith wrote: Hi, I have a problem with a Dell Poweredge SC440 computer. It's equipped with a Dell SATA/SAS 5iR controller, it's from LSI actually (maybe megaraid). I'm using FreeBSD 7.1 Release I have 2x 500 GB SATA in a

Re: Problem with SATA/SAS 5iR

Kevin Smith wrote: Thanks for your advice, this was unusual for me, because even on a 4iR I couldnt see this space reservation. What about sysinstalls write error when extracting the ports collection? Bad install media perhaps? Have you encountered any other issues? Richard

pkg_delete segfaulting after upgrading to 7.1

I've recently upgraded my system to 7.1Stable. While upgrading my ports, pkg_delete spontaneously ceased functioning. Some of the ports were upgraded successfully so pkg_delete must have worked at some point. I'm sort of a novice so I'm at a loss as to how to go about diagnosing and fixing this

Re: x48 display messed up with Xorg 7.4

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:29:57 +0200, Esa Karkkainen wrote: I've got screenshots at: http://koti.welho.com/ekarkkai/x48_snap_1.jpg http://koti.welho.com/ekarkkai/x48_snap_2.jpg Those look exactly like the problem I am having. So, what piece of Xorg causes display problems? Graphics drivers,

Re: Backport of glxsb(4) to RELENG_6

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:44:21PM +0100, Patrick Lamaizière wrote: Hi, I've backported the glxsb(4) driver to RELENG_6 (to use it on FreeNAS by instance). http://user.lamaiziere.net/patrick/glxsb-6-100209.tar.gz I am not able to test it, but I hope it will work. You can test with

Re: Problem with SATA/SAS 5iR

2009/2/12 Richard Tector richardtec...@thekeelecentre.com Kevin Smith wrote: Thanks for your advice, this was unusual for me, because even on a 4iR I couldnt see this space reservation. What about sysinstalls write error when extracting the ports collection? Bad install media perhaps?

Re: Problem with SATA/SAS 5iR

Kevin Smith wrote: Just another thing, can you change or monitor the behaviour of this spare space reservation? Looking into man mpt gave nothing useful regarding this issue. The tunefs manpage has a little about the space reservation. You can set it with -m IIRC when doing the newfs, but I

Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

I have a machine that can run either (proved, I can boot the AMD-64 release disk) Can I SOURCE UPGRADE from one to the other? That is, is it possible to do a make buildworld, make buildkernel and then make installkernel and wind up with AMD64 instead of the 32-bit code? Or must I

Re: Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Karl, Karl Denninger wrote: I have a machine that can run either (proved, I can boot the AMD-64 release disk) Can I SOURCE UPGRADE from one to the other? That is, is it possible to do a make buildworld, make buildkernel and then make

Re: Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Karl, Karl Denninger wrote: I have a machine that can run either (proved, I can boot the AMD-64 release disk) Can I SOURCE UPGRADE from one to the other? That is, is it possible to do a make buildworld, make buildkernel and

Re: Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karl Denninger wrote: Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Karl, Karl Denninger wrote: I have a machine that can run either (proved, I can boot the AMD-64 release disk) Can I SOURCE UPGRADE from one to the

Re: Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karl Denninger wrote: Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Karl, Karl Denninger wrote: I have a machine that can run either (proved, I can boot the AMD-64 release disk) Can I SOURCE

Re: Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

On Feb 12, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Karl Denninger wrote: I have a machine that can run either (proved, I can boot the AMD-64 release disk) Can I SOURCE UPGRADE from one to the other? That is, is it possible to do a make buildworld, make buildkernel and then make installkernel and wind up with

Re: Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karl Denninger wrote: [...] I guess I need to schedule the 2-3 hours of downtime. the reason for this, by the way, is that I have a dbms app on there that is getting too RAM hungry for its own good (its a Quadcore CPU) and I'm up against the

Re: Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karl Denninger wrote: [...] I guess I need to schedule the 2-3 hours of downtime. the reason for this, by the way, is that I have a dbms app on there that is getting too RAM hungry for its own good (its a Quadcore CPU) and I'm

Re: Broken loader on 7.1-STABLE?

On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:05:04 +1300 Mark Kirkwood mar...@paradise.net.nz wrote: Mark Kirkwood wrote: I wrote: I am getting this too - update from RELENG_7 @12 Jan src to 20 Jan and I have: panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x511d from

Re: Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:01:38 CST Karl Denninger k...@denninger.net wrote: I guess I need to schedule the 2-3 hours of downtime. the reason for this, by the way, is that I have a dbms app on there that is getting too RAM hungry for its own good (its a Quadcore CPU) and I'm up against the

Re: pkg_delete segfaulting after upgrading to 7.1

rosbox# pkg_delete -f gpgme-1.1.5_1 pkg_delete: package 'gpgme-1.1.5_1' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled (but I'll delete it anyway): seahorse-2.24.1_1 Segmentation fault (core dumped) I've had similar problem, and found the problem is in the +CONTENTS in the

Re: Upgrade from 32-bit to AMD-64?

Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karl Denninger wrote: [...] I guess I need to schedule the 2-3 hours of downtime. the reason for this, by the way, is that I have a dbms app on there that is getting too RAM hungry for its own good (its a Quadcore CPU) and I'm up