on 06/12/2010 08:48 Andrey V. Elsukov said the following:
On 06.12.2010 3:37, Yue Wu wrote:
Thanks, I remembered that boot0cfg in the previous version can do it
without changing the sysctl parameter, maybe it's changed in newer
version.
It seems it was broken with r209469.
Something as
On 06.12.2010 13:15, Andriy Gapon wrote:
It seems it was broken with r209469.
Something as simple as what Yue is trying to do could/should be done with
gpart.
But boot0cfg has some additional features...
boot0cfg is already doing this via gpart's ioctl interface.
AFAIR, there is yet
On Sat 2010-11-27 (15:22), Gareth de Vaux wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying to simulate a disk fail and replacement in
a raidz array and failing myself. What'm I doing wrong? Here's
Ok I did some science, it looks like the array doesn't like me
throwing zeros at the disk when it's 'offline'. If I take
There's two unloved buglets that as far as I can see haven't been
resolved so far in 8-STABLE, but which would be nice to squeeze into
8.2-RELEASE.
Could some kind committer/releng type please take a look at them -
pretty please?
conf/144842: [ip6] ipv6_default_interface causes route
Quoting Artem Belevich fbsdl...@src.cx (from Sun, 5 Dec 2010
12:27:00 -0800):
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
By the way, in order for this to work one would need r207057 applied
to -8. Any chance that could be MFC'ed?
on 06/12/2010 07:20 per...@pluto.rain.com said the following:
Would there be some fundamental problem in changing MSGBUF_SIZE
from a compiled-in constant to a tunable that could be set at the
loader prompt? (I'm _not_ suggesting that it be adjustable while
the system is running.)
The
on 06/12/2010 16:59 Alexander Leidinger said the following:
I do not think it is trivial. The amount of discussion around this does not
makes
me want to do a MFC.
Sorry, I must have missed the discussion.
Could you please clarify what is not trivial in this case?
The change itself seems to be
On 2010-Nov-28 02:24:21 -0600, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
Since all the boinc processes are running at i31, why are they impacting
a buildkernel that runs with 0 nicety?
With the setup you presented
Anybody has any ideas? At the beginning, I guess it's caused by some
software. After seen it many times in my log, I found that it appears
whenever I want to use the sound card. If you don't use the sound card for a
long time (like 10mins), the next time you use it will cause this warning
message.
Trying to re-install a set of HP servers over the iLO, and every time
I tried to install the 8.1 CD I ended up with an error message
telling me that the CD looked more like an audio CD than a FreeBSD
distibution.
I ouzzled over it a bit, and then remembered that I originally installed
these
on 07/12/2010 00:51 Pete French said the following:
Trying to re-install a set of HP servers over the iLO, and every time
I tried to install the 8.1 CD I ended up with an error message
telling me that the CD looked more like an audio CD than a FreeBSD
distibution.
I ouzzled over it a bit,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 10:51:36PM +, Pete French wrote:
Trying to re-install a set of HP servers over the iLO, and every time
I tried to install the 8.1 CD I ended up with an error message
telling me that the CD looked more like an audio CD than a FreeBSD
distibution.
I ouzzled over it
Basically if it feels like you are the first one to report the problem, then,
unfortunately, the onus is on you...
Sure, I've been around here long enough to know this - was just trying to see
if anyone else knew about it, as it takes so long to boot over the network
that I really didn't want
on 07/12/2010 01:27 Pete French said the following:
Actually my expereice of filing PR's has been pretty positive over the
years. Am a bit surprised you feel this way. Investigating and posting
here also generates reseults, but I do like to tag them onto a PR in
the end, just so they dont get
Apparently you've been born with a silver spoon or something :-)
...more likely an ability to irritate people until it gets fixed ;-)
Because few thousand other people do not seem to be as lucky:
http://people.freebsd.org/~edwin/gnats/gnats-openpercategorycummulative.html
ah, not good graph
So, I just gave the 8.1 CD a try - which didnt take nearly as long as
anticipated. End result is that it also fails to insall. Pr
filed as http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152874
Am wndering if this could be due to the change in the USB stack
somehow though - I have a feeling that iLO
This problem has been reported many times in the past and almost
certainly has nothing to do with 8.x. Here's a thread about the matter
where a user states the same as you but about 7.1:
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2008-10/msg00307.html
I found that - it
on 07/12/2010 01:44 Pete French said the following:
Apparently you've been born with a silver spoon or something :-)
...more likely an ability to irritate people until it gets fixed ;-)
That's exactly the reason why I said unless the reporter also actively pursues
it :-)
Because as my
On Monday 06 December 2010 06:46 pm, Pete French wrote:
So, I just gave the 8.1 CD a try - which didnt take nearly as long
as anticipated. End result is that it also fails to insall. Pr
filed as http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152874
Am wndering if this could be due to the change
on 07/12/2010 01:46 Pete French said the following:
So, I just gave the 8.1 CD a try - which didnt take nearly as long as
anticipated. End result is that it also fails to insall. Pr
filed as http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152874
BTW, that error message is produced by sysinstall on
This problem may be a reverse problem of this PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138789
In other words, your virtual CD-ROM reads correct TOC from mounted
image but block size is wrong? Maybe old umass(4) corrects this case
heuristicly but the new USB stack doesn't?
Might be
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:52:25PM +, Pete French wrote:
This problem has been reported many times in the past and almost
certainly has nothing to do with 8.x. Here's a thread about the matter
where a user states the same as you but about 7.1:
Quoth Pete French on Monday, 06 December 2010:
Apparently you've been born with a silver spoon or something :-)
...more likely an ability to irritate people until it gets fixed ;-)
Because few thousand other people do not seem to be as lucky:
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/12/2010 01:44 Pete French said the following:
Apparently you've been born with a silver spoon or something :-)
...more likely an ability to irritate people until it gets fixed ;-)
That's exactly the reason why I said unless the
24 matches
Mail list logo
