On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:30:39PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
why and we can't ask him now, I'm afraid. I just sent an e-mail to
What happened to him?
Oops, I was thinking of something else.
http://valleywag.gawker.com/383763/freebsd-developer-kip-macy-arrested-for-tormenting-tenants
Marcus
On 2011-Jan-09 10:32:48 -0500, Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org wrote:
Daniel Braniss writes...
I have it pxebooting nicely and running with an NFS root
but it then reports locking problems: devd, syslogd, moused (and maybe
Actually, that was me, not Daniel.
Are you mounting /var via nfs?
Hello, Stable.
Now, with newfs -L name, geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
to not use device names for FSes in /etc/fstab at all. But what to
do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on
/dev/ada0s1b or /dev/ad0s1b whatever name it has now?
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Stable.
Now, with newfs -L name, geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
to not use device names for FSes in /etc/fstab at all. But what to
do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on
/dev/ada0s1b or
On 12.01.2011 21:02, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Stable.
Now, with newfs -L name, geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
to not use device names for FSes in /etc/fstab at all. But what to
do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on
/dev/ada0s1b or /dev/ad0s1b whatever
2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru:
Now, with newfs -L name, geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
to not use device names for FSes in /etc/fstab at all. But what to
do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on
/dev/ada0s1b or /dev/ad0s1b whatever name it has
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru:
Now, with newfs -L name, geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
to not use device names for FSes in /etc/fstab at all. But what to
do with swap partitions? How to say,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru:
Now, with newfs -L name, geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible
to not use device names for
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/12 Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru:
Now, with newfs -L name,
On 2011-Jan-12 02:32:52 +0100, Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com wrote:
The freebsd versions of sed contained a bug/regression, when \n char
can i subsitue, gsed not affected with this bug:
gsed contains non-standard extensions and you have been suckered into
using them. Try using 'gsed
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:00:09PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:32:52AM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
hi all!
The freebsd versions of sed contained a bug/regression, when \n char
can i subsitue, gsed not affected with this bug:
FreeBSD xxx 8.1-RELEASE
Interesting, I was just testing Solaris 11 Express's ability to handle a pulled
drive today. It handles it quite well. However, my Areca 1880 drive (arcmsr0)
crashes when you reinsert the drive.. but that's another topic, and an issue
for Areca tech support..
..back to the point:
Solaris runs
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Bob Willcox b...@immure.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:00:09PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:32:52AM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
hi all!
The freebsd versions of sed contained a bug/regression, when \n char
can i subsitue,
On 01/12/11 19:32, Chris Forgeron wrote:
Interesting, I was just testing Solaris 11 Express's ability to handle a pulled
drive today. It handles it quite well. However, my Areca 1880 drive (arcmsr0)
crashes when you reinsert the drive.. but that's another topic, and an issue
for Areca tech
I think we'd be happy with whatever solution someone was kind enough to donate
the time towards.
Although, stripping the Solaris FMD stuff down to just the ZFS parts would help
keep Solaris/FreeBSD a bit closer in their ZFS implementations, which is of
arguable importance, but I do like
On Wed, January 12, 2011 2:32 pm, Bob Willcox wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:00:09PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:32:52AM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
hi all!
The freebsd versions of sed contained a bug/regression, when \n char
can i subsitue, gsed not
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:13 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:13 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:13 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:46 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:30:46 -
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:32:43 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:32:43 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:32:43 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:33:05 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 04:33:05 -
CC'ing responsible committers...
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/if_llatbl.c
- Forwarded message from FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org -
From: FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org
To: FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org, sta...@freebsd.org,
TB --- 2011-01-13 05:46:48 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-01-13 05:46:48 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-01-13 05:46:48 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 05:47:02 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-01-13 05:47:02 -
20 matches
Mail list logo
