Hello, Freebsd-stable.
Now I'm backing up my HOME filesystem with dump(8). It works
perfectly for 80GiB FS with many features: snapshot for consistency,
levels, nodump flag (my users use it a lot!), ability to extract
only one removed file from backup without restoring full FS, simple
sctipy
I am runing mountd with -e (experimental :-)
this is happening too often lately, where mountd just stops responding
mountd 11762 [dp-dp_config_rwlock] 8.93r 0.00u 0.00s 0% 1320k
any help/clues?
thanks,
danny
___
Hello, freebsd-geom.
On FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE long periods of «Suspend time» have been detected
- tens of seconds - while reading large files from gjournal partition:
For example:
root@mail [/var/tmp]# du -h /var/tmp/access.log
8.3G /var/tmp/access.log
root@mail[/var/tmp]# dd
On 24/03/2011 16:28, George Mamalakis wrote:
Hello everybody,
In short:
nsswitch seems not to honor (fully) the criteria and actions of
nsswitch.conf. A detailed analysis of my problem can be found on this
thread (it's on freebsd forums, and it hasn't been answered yet):
It is not a hastd crash, but a kernel crash triggered by hastd process.
I am not sure I got the same crash as you but apparently the race is possible
in g_gate on device creation.
I got the following crash starting many hast providers simultaneously:
This is very interestng to me - my
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:47:22 +0100 Pete French wrote:
It is not a hastd crash, but a kernel crash triggered by hastd process.
I am not sure I got the same crash as you but apparently the race is
possible
in g_gate on device creation.
I got the following crash starting many hast
I've setup a server with FreeBSD 8.2 (prerelase) and patched zfs to
ver. 28. The server has 11 disks each 2 TB in raidz2. The performance
is very good and I've got approx. 117 MB/s on plain GB nics using
iscsi.
I'm mounting the FreeBSD-server from a couple of vmware esxi 4.1
servers using nfs,
on 28/03/2011 10:20 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
Hello, Freebsd-stable.
Now I'm backing up my HOME filesystem with dump(8). It works
perfectly for 80GiB FS with many features: snapshot for consistency,
levels, nodump flag (my users use it a lot!), ability to extract
only one
Hello,
I'd be curious to know how much memory you have. Also, you mention both
iSCSI and NFS in the post and also say that you are using ESX with NFS.
Can you reconfirm that you're definitely using NFS and not iSCSI?
This is a type of setup I've been investigating myself and I hope you
I am updated on FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 to 8.2-STABLE using cvsup.conf,
as follows:
*default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
*default delete use-rel-suffix
*default compress
src-all
#ports-all
Then to build system use the following
Don't use the -j flag when installing your kernel.
make installkernel KERNCONF=VPN2
On 28 Μαρ 2011, at 3:04 μ.μ., Márcio Luciano Donada wrote:
I am updated on FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 to 8.2-STABLE using cvsup.conf,
as follows:
*default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/usr
*default
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:20, lev@ wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-stable.
Now I'm backing up my HOME filesystem with dump(8). It works
perfectly for 80GiB FS with many features: snapshot for consistency,
levels, nodump flag (my users use it a lot!), ability to extract
only one removed file from backup
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Claus Guttesen kome...@gmail.com wrote:
I've setup a server with FreeBSD 8.2 (prerelase) and patched zfs to
ver. 28. The server has 11 disks each 2 TB in raidz2. The performance
is very good and I've got approx. 117 MB/s on plain GB nics using
iscsi.
I'm
On 03/26/2011 12:00 PM, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28:53PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hi,
Hi.
If one has multiple entries in the SPD some representing more specific
network addresses not to be encrypted and sent over an
ipsec tunnel vs more general
Quoting Claus Guttesen kome...@gmail.com (from Mon, 28 Mar 2011
13:22:00 +0200):
I've setup a server with FreeBSD 8.2 (prerelase) and patched zfs to
ver. 28. The server has 11 disks each 2 TB in raidz2. The performance
is very good and I've got approx. 117 MB/s on plain GB nics using
iscsi.
Hi Geoge,
without the option-j to make the error is exactly the same.
Em 28/3/2011 10:21, George Kontostanos escreveu:
Don't use the -j flag when installing your kernel.
make installkernel KERNCONF=VPN2
On 28 Μαρ 2011, at 3:04 μ.μ., Márcio Luciano Donada wrote:
I am updated on FreeBSD
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:25, mdonada@ wrote:
Hi Geoge,
without the option-j to make the error is exactly the same.
You will have to re-build kernel. Start from scratch.
--
Regards,
J. Hellenthal
(0x89D8547E)
JJH48-ARIN
___
On 28/03/2011 11:43, George Mamalakis wrote:
On 24/03/2011 16:28, George Mamalakis wrote:
Hello everybody,
In short:
nsswitch seems not to honor (fully) the criteria and actions of
nsswitch.conf. A detailed analysis of my problem can be found on this
thread (it's on freebsd forums, and it
I'm mounting the FreeBSD-server from a couple of vmware esxi 4.1
servers using nfs, but when there is alot of i/o the server becomes
unresponsive, easily triggered by installing ie. ms-sql. The server
itself is up but is not reachable from the network. When I take the
nic down and up again
If your disk controller has a lot of cache on it, and a battery
backup, then enabling the write cache and disabling the ZIL can be
faster, without sacrifising consistency (the write cache on the
controller acts like a ZIL). There's several threads on the
zfs-discuss mailing list where this
Hi there,
I have a small backup server (8.2-STABLE). It boots from ufs and has a zfs
pool for backups that consists of 8 drives configured as 4 mirrored devices,
totally around 2.5 TB.
Been working great, no issues, until the past few days when remote rsyncs to it
have started to get very
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Mark Morley m...@islandnet.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have a small backup server (8.2-STABLE). It boots from ufs and has a zfs
pool for backups that consists of 8 drives configured as 4 mirrored devices,
totally around 2.5 TB.
Been working great, no issues,
Hi Pawel
I'm running GELI encryption on a hardware RAID5 (8x1TB), formatted to 6.3T
usable space using i386 FreeBSD 7.3-PRERELEASE. Write speeds to the drive
are just over 40MB/s which is not too bad but I would like to improve it as
the drive gets 270MB/s without encryption.
I've run the
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:50:29 +0200 Claus Guttesen kome...@gmail.com
wrote:
However, the better solution, and the one most recommended for those
using NFS with ZFS, is to install a small, write-optimised,
SLC-based SSD to the system as a separate log (SLOG/ZIL) device.
NFS is a very
While trying to develop an understanding of the use POSIX message
queues, I found that issuing a mq_open (2) call, resulted in Bad system
call: 12 error message. I have tried to run the tools/regression/mqueue
tests, but they fail in mq_open with the bad system call error. In
addition, the mq_open
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Mikolaj Golub troc...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 10:52:08 -0700 Freddie Cash wrote:
FC hastd backtrace is here:
FC http://www.sd73.bc.ca/downloads/crash/hast-backtrace.png
It is not a hastd crash, but a kernel crash triggered by hastd process.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 01:19:38PM -0400, Derek Tattersall wrote:
While trying to develop an understanding of the use POSIX message
queues, I found that issuing a mq_open (2) call, resulted in Bad system
call: 12 error message. I have tried to run the tools/regression/mqueue
tests, but they
I'm mounting the FreeBSD-server from a couple of vmware esxi 4.1
servers using nfs, but when there is alot of i/o the server becomes
unresponsive, easily triggered by installing ie. ms-sql. The server
itself is up but is not reachable from the network. When I take the
nic down and up again
I'm mounting the FreeBSD-server from a couple of vmware esxi 4.1
servers using nfs, but when there is alot of i/o the server becomes
unresponsive, easily triggered by installing ie. ms-sql. The server
itself is up but is not reachable from the network. When I take the
nic down and up again
I've been trying to switch from Linux to BSD for my everyday computing (email,
word processing, spreadsheets, etc.), but I couldn't get things to work
properly. I've been so spoiled by the quickness and user-friendliness of
antiX/Swift Linux and Puppy Linux for so long. I have a backlog of
30 matches
Mail list logo
