On 2/9/12 10:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:02:12PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/9/12 1:56 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:48:29PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
does anyone know of problems with freebsd and this system?
the kernel We
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
various parts of the network stack being loadable, which is not
as easy as it sounds, especially making them unloadable again
currently ...
Seems to me unloadability does not matter to the case under
discussion, which is modularizing the
These statements are false, esp. worrying is that they are
interwinned with some facts that get tilted to support false presumption.
Kernel do not care about which interpreter is /libexec/ld-elf.so.
The path to the interpreter is specified in the binary itself. So if you
have 32bit binary
on 11/02/2012 01:30 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
This won't work for us. This requires manual intervention. When we
have a machine that panic's, we want it sitting at a ddb prompt
indefinitely until an admin gets to it to find out what happened. There
may be some way to automatically
Hi Randy,
On 11 Feb 2012, at 10:58, Randy Bush wrote:
so do you have direct suggestion(s) on how to hack the system (while the
32-bit kernel is running) so that i can boot the 64-bit kernel and get
the 64-bit world up?
randy
trying something nanobsd'ish in where you get a 64bit kernel to
Le ven 10 fév 12 à 14:56:04 +0100, Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net
écrivait :
Hi,
Hello,
The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you
compiling a custom kernel in a production environment (so I rule out
debug options zhich are not enabled in GENERIC)? Are
On 11/02/2012, at 7:30 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
turns out that the HP machine has an HP branded (and with different firmware)
raid controller
that is not quite the same as the standard one. FreeBSD can't handle it and
dies.
Josh Paetzel may remember the exact type.. I forget..
I
On Feb 11, 2012, at 4:55 AM, Jan Mikkelsen j...@transactionware.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012, at 7:30 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
turns out that the HP machine has an HP branded (and with different
firmware) raid controller
that is not quite the same as the standard one. FreeBSD can't handle
Hello,
I finally decided to 'play' a bit with ZFS on a notebook, some years
old, but I installed a brand new disk and memtest passes OK.
I installed base+ports on partition 2, using 'classical' UFS.
I crypted partition 3 and created a single zpool on it containing
4 Z-file-systems :
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:15:00 + Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
On 10. Feb 2012, at 13:56 , Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
during some big discussions in the last monts on various lists, one
of the problems was that some people would like to use
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:13:53 -0800 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
I've done this a few times.
Me too, and others probably too, so let's end the waste of time and
provide one officially.
The /boot/loader takes a _long_ time to suck in the 25 odd modules my
eeepc requires to load a
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:40:41 +0100 Thierry Thomas thie...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Le ven 10 fév 12 à 14:56:04 +0100, Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net écrivait :
Hi,
Hello,
The question is, is this enough? Or asked differently, why are you
compiling a custom kernel in a
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:33:08 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
various parts of the network stack being loadable, which is not
as easy as it sounds, especially making them unloadable again
currently ...
Seems to me unloadability
Hi,
In FreeBSD 8 i used the loader-variable hw.ata.ata_dma=0 to get my computer
boot on a CF card. But
in FreeBSD 9.0 it doesn't seem to work. Could it be another variable or is it
something else that doesn't work
in 9? The machine boots up the installer when the CF-card is not present but
On 02/11/12 20:15, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
In FreeBSD 8 i used the loader-variable hw.ata.ata_dma=0 to get my computer
boot on a CF card. But
in FreeBSD 9.0 it doesn't seem to work. Could it be another variable or is it
something else that doesn't work
in 9? The machine boots up the installer
Hi,
What about the disk access is unaligned? Do you mean not sector aligned? or?
This is a common problem people face doing disk IO analysis.
The whole point about not allowing unaligned access is to make the
disk IO path cleaner. It does mean that the filesystem code (and GEOM
modules
Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:40:41 +0100 Thierry Thomas thie...@freebsd.org
wrote:
is there another place to put options to atkbd and sc, like
these ones:
options ATKBD_DFLT_KEYMAP # specify the built-in keymap
makeoptions
On 11/02/2012, at 6:32, Joe Holden wrote:
On a related note - does the new installer have any kind of config file for
unattended installs a la sysinstall?
No it doesn't, that said since the new release CD is a live file system (vs the
old MFS on a CD kludge) it is much much easier to script
18 matches
Mail list logo
